Trading in the housing market appears to be stabilizing as a COVID-19 outbreak that started in May subsides, the latest transaction data show, while domestic banks continue to hold a positive outlook for the residential housing market in major cities.
Financial Supervisory Commission data indicate that total real-estate lending has staged a steady monthly increase, growing to a record NT$12.21 trillion (US$438.64 billion) as of the end of September, which was greater than August’s NT$12.14 trillion and marked the eighth consecutive monthly increase since January’s NT$11.63 trillion.
Real-estate lending registered double-digit percentage annual growth each month this year, with its share in bank lending standing at 26.83 percent at the end of September, compared with 26.73 percent in August and 26.88 percent in January, commission data show.
Even though the commission said that banks’ average property lending-to-total-loans ratio has changed little from last year — it remained around 26 percent in the past few months — several banks have been on the commission’s radar as their real-estate lending approaches the regulator’s property loan quota for banks.
Under Article 72-2 of the Banking Act (銀行法), loans extended for residential and commercial properties may not exceed 30 percent of the aggregate of a bank’s deposits and financial debentures. In September, seven banks reported that their property loans reached 28 to 29 percent of their total deposits and debentures, while one bank said its ratio exceeded 29 percent, but did not reach the regulatory ceiling, the commission said.
The latest lending data also suggest that the real-estate market remains hot and the central bank’s selective credit control measures for the market might not have worked as well as expected. The central bank has implemented several tightening measures since March last year by increasing the cost and limiting the source of funds for property buyers through loan-to-value ratio caps, but its moderate policy actions seemed at most to slow the pace of increases in property loans and housing prices while not stemming their further growth.
The upside pressures on property prices could have also been partially fueled by low interest rates. Therefore, a protracted monetary easing approach adopted by the central bank does not do much to cool the real-estate market. Some have suggested that the most effective solution would be more taxes, although there is no easy path for such changes to occur any time soon.
The public has grown more doubtful of the effectiveness of the bank’s measures to rein in real-estate speculation, which could ultimately impair the bank’s credibility. Some central bank board directors suggested in its September board meeting that it implement a mix of macroprudential measures and interest-rate adjustments to address housing market concerns, as relying solely on interest-rate adjustments to tame property price rises could create serious problems for other sectors.
On the other hand, as banks’ real estate lending has made up a growing share of their total lending, it has also invited concerns about whether economic development in Taiwan is balanced, whether banks’ resource allocations are reasonable and whether their property-loan risk management is adequate. Once the central bank decides to raise its policy rates, or if the asset bubble collapses, people who cannot pay their mortgages would likely dump their properties to the banks, which would result in systemic risks for banks. The financial regulator and monetary policymaker should take precautions as soon as possible.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations