On Thursday, China applied to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) — a regional economic organization whose 11 member countries have a combined GDP of US$11 trillion. That is less than China’s 2019 GDP of US$14.34 trillion, so why is China so eager to join?
China says there are two main reasons: To consolidate its foreign trade and foreign investment base, and to fast-track economic and trade relations between China and member countries of the CPTPP free-trade area.
China’s bilateral trade with these countries grew from US$78 billion in 2003 to US$685.1 billion last year, mostly because of China’s 2005 accession to the ASEAN free-trade area. Even so, China must have other, more important considerations than just trying to expand its economic territory.
China’s first consideration is counter-encirclement. The CPTPP’s forerunner was the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). Then-US president Barack Obama’s motive for proposing the TPP was for countries on both sides of the Pacific to economically encircle China.
However, Obama’s successor, former US president Donald Trump, announced the US’ withdrawal from the TPP on his first day in office. That left Japan holding the TPP baby, which was rebranded as the CPTPP.
For China, joining the CPTPP in the US’ absence would be an act of counter-encirclement and it would diminish the US’ importance on the world stage.
It would also give China leverage over Taiwan, making it more difficult for Taiwan to join the bloc.
China’s second aim is to strengthen and consolidate its Belt and Road Initiative. Among the CPTPP members, only Japan, Canada, Australia and Mexico are outside the initiative, while Malaysia, Singapore, New Zealand, Vietnam, Brunei, Chile and Peru are all initiative partners. If China joins the CPTPP, it would gain another chain with which to bind these countries and consolidate its initiative.
The third aim is to deepen other countries’ dependence on China. If China joined the CPTPP, the other member countries’ systematic economic dependence on China would deepen, and even Australia would be unable to resist.
Beijing’s fourth purpose is to use trade for political ends. Business interests often pressure politicians into making decisions that are favorable to China, but unfavorable to their respective nations. If China joins the CPTPP, it would find it easier to use businesspeople to force their governments to comply.
The fifth aim is to call the shots on economic and trade rules. Obama’s initial reason for creating the TPP was, in his own words, that “we can’t let countries like China write the rules of the global economy.”
As China’s power grows, if it takes the further step of joining the CPTPP, it would be able to dictate regional trade rules. Japan would need to hand the platform it has worked so hard to build over to China.
Joining the CPTPP is another step in China’s strategic expansion, so Japan and Australia must find a way to stop it.
Liu Ming-te holds a doctorate in political science from the Free University of Berlin.
Translated by Julian Clegg
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS