It is difficult to forget the harrowing photograph of Jih Chin-chun (日進春) that shows him laughing before his execution.
On Aug. 29, 1952, Jih was shot five times by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) military police by a river, his corpse left among a pile of bodies in today’s Liuzhangli (六張犁) area of Taipei.
Jih, a member of the Saisiyat community, was reportedly the first Aborigine to fall victim to the authoritarian regime’s White Terror atrocities, when anyone could “disappear” over suspicion that they were reading banned books, badmouthing the government, associating with communists or other activities.
The Transitional Justice Commission honored Jih on the 69th anniversary of his death, announcing that it has asked researchers to compile a booklet focusing on Aborigines killed during the period, including Paiwan youth Lai Hung-man (賴紅炎).
While Taiwanese today are familiar with Aboriginal resistance against Japanese rule thanks to movies such as Warriors of the Rainbow: Seediq Bale, little is mentioned about them when it comes to the White Terror era. How many people had heard of Jih and Lai until the commission highlighted them in a statement to the media on Sunday?
Only a handful of Aborigines are commonly mentioned and they were linked to the same incident: Yapasuyongu Yulunana and Uyonge Yatauyungana of the Tsou people, and Losing Watan, an Atayal. All three were politically active — the former two had already run afoul of the government by organizing an armed resistance against the government’s brutal crackdown following the 228 Incident, while Losing Watan was a member of the Provincial Assembly. All three were executed in 1954 for their involvement in advocating Aboriginal autonomy — two years after Jih — and branded as communists.
By contrast, Jih’s experiences echo those of countless others killed during the White Terror period. He was a schoolteacher who talked to the wrong people. Jih was reportedly recruited by Chinese Communist Party sympathizer Chang Yan-mei (張燕梅). Lai got into trouble over his writing while he was a student, in which he mused about how to improve the lives of Aborigines. He was detained, but eventually released.
It is a gargantuan task to unearth all of the stories, especially as some people are still reticent to talk, despite martial law having ended in 1987.
However, with the commission’s efforts, more of the truth will be revealed.
The stories of Aborigines during the White Terror era are an important part of history that is often overlooked, so it is good that the commission has allocated more effort to the issue.
As Legislator Saidhai Tahovecahe, a Rukai, wrote on Facebook, there were countless Aborigines besides Jih who suffered at the hands of the regime, including police officers, teachers, doctors and political leaders.
However, judging from some of the comments on Saidhai Tahovecahe’s post, some Taiwanese still see transitional justice as bringing up old wounds and dividing society.
However, as many Han Taiwanese still misunderstand Aborigines or even discriminate against them, it is important to understand that the great loss of land, culture and autonomy they experienced in the centuries prior continued during the White Terror period.
Misunderstandings arise because people forget the past, not because they bring it up, and as more about the period comes to light, hopefully it will bring more understanding and unity.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS