It is difficult to forget the harrowing photograph of Jih Chin-chun (日進春) that shows him laughing before his execution.
On Aug. 29, 1952, Jih was shot five times by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) military police by a river, his corpse left among a pile of bodies in today’s Liuzhangli (六張犁) area of Taipei.
Jih, a member of the Saisiyat community, was reportedly the first Aborigine to fall victim to the authoritarian regime’s White Terror atrocities, when anyone could “disappear” over suspicion that they were reading banned books, badmouthing the government, associating with communists or other activities.
The Transitional Justice Commission honored Jih on the 69th anniversary of his death, announcing that it has asked researchers to compile a booklet focusing on Aborigines killed during the period, including Paiwan youth Lai Hung-man (賴紅炎).
While Taiwanese today are familiar with Aboriginal resistance against Japanese rule thanks to movies such as Warriors of the Rainbow: Seediq Bale, little is mentioned about them when it comes to the White Terror era. How many people had heard of Jih and Lai until the commission highlighted them in a statement to the media on Sunday?
Only a handful of Aborigines are commonly mentioned and they were linked to the same incident: Yapasuyongu Yulunana and Uyonge Yatauyungana of the Tsou people, and Losing Watan, an Atayal. All three were politically active — the former two had already run afoul of the government by organizing an armed resistance against the government’s brutal crackdown following the 228 Incident, while Losing Watan was a member of the Provincial Assembly. All three were executed in 1954 for their involvement in advocating Aboriginal autonomy — two years after Jih — and branded as communists.
By contrast, Jih’s experiences echo those of countless others killed during the White Terror period. He was a schoolteacher who talked to the wrong people. Jih was reportedly recruited by Chinese Communist Party sympathizer Chang Yan-mei (張燕梅). Lai got into trouble over his writing while he was a student, in which he mused about how to improve the lives of Aborigines. He was detained, but eventually released.
It is a gargantuan task to unearth all of the stories, especially as some people are still reticent to talk, despite martial law having ended in 1987.
However, with the commission’s efforts, more of the truth will be revealed.
The stories of Aborigines during the White Terror era are an important part of history that is often overlooked, so it is good that the commission has allocated more effort to the issue.
As Legislator Saidhai Tahovecahe, a Rukai, wrote on Facebook, there were countless Aborigines besides Jih who suffered at the hands of the regime, including police officers, teachers, doctors and political leaders.
However, judging from some of the comments on Saidhai Tahovecahe’s post, some Taiwanese still see transitional justice as bringing up old wounds and dividing society.
However, as many Han Taiwanese still misunderstand Aborigines or even discriminate against them, it is important to understand that the great loss of land, culture and autonomy they experienced in the centuries prior continued during the White Terror period.
Misunderstandings arise because people forget the past, not because they bring it up, and as more about the period comes to light, hopefully it will bring more understanding and unity.
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength