Within the past 12 months, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has no fewer than four times publicly called on the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to prepare for war. On Jan. 4, Xi welcomed the New Year with an ominous message: The Chinese military must be ready for war “at any moment.”
This followed a similar instruction on Oct. 13 last year, when he said, while inspecting PLA marines in Chaozhou City, that they must “put all [their] minds and energy on preparing for war.”
Prior to that, on May 26 last year, he told PLA officers at the annual National People’s Congress that commanders should “step up preparations for armed combat” — and specifically name-checked “Taiwanese independence forces.”
On Tuesday last week, Xi reprised the chest-thumping rhetoric, ordering the PLA to “increase combat readiness,” and be prepared to “resolutely safeguard national sovereignty, security and development interests.”
Xi has also repeatedly warned of a “peace disease” that he believes has “infected every corner of the military.” The implication is that the PLA, not having experienced significant combat since the 1979 Sino-Vietnamese War, is in desperate need of real combat to test its mettle.
Recent clashes with Indian troops on the China-India border might have been an attempt to engineer some real fighting experience and toughen up troops ahead of a larger-scale military operation.
There are two schools of thought regarding how to interpret Xi’s martial rhetoric. One, it is relatively innocuous stuff — red meat, tossed to hardline party members and hawkish generals by an insecure leader to placate their bloodlust over Taiwan and other perceived territorial injustices. Two, Xi is deadly serious, taking into context Beijing’s immense military build-up over the past two decades, its repeated threats to annex Taiwan and its persistent provocative military “exercises” around Taiwan.
Indeed, a growing number of Taiwanese and international observers believe the threat to Taiwan from an increasingly belligerent China is today at an all-time high. On Tuesday last week, US Navy Admiral Philip Davidson warned that Beijing could invade Taiwan within the next six years. Taiwanese and Japanese military experts have issued similar warnings in the past few months.
Given the apparent severity of the threat, a wise government would adopt the precautionary principle — assume that the latter is true, and prepare the nation accordingly.
President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration has made significant progress on multiple fronts since coming to power in 2016 — initiating a new defense doctrine based on asymmetric warfare, successfully petitioning the US to sell Taiwan significant quantities of advanced military equipment, and starting the ball rolling on an indigenous submarine program. However, these measures pale into comparison with the relentless advance of the Chinese military.
At the National People’s Congress early this month, Beijing announced a 6.8 percent increase in this year’s defense budget to 1.35 trillion yuan (US$208 billion). While most international analysts believe China understates its defense spending, the official figure is 16 times that of Taiwan.
Taiwan’s defense budget for this year is to increase by only 4.4 percent, while the nation has gradually wound down compulsory military service and training for its reserve forces.
On Wednesday, National Taiwan University associate professor of political science Chen Shih-min (陳世民) urged the government to think about how to convey the gravity of the situation to the public.
While conventional wisdom dictates that there are no votes in defense and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) would certainly try to make hay by falsely claiming that the Tsai administration’s policies have made Taiwan unsafe, the government must trust in the public’s natural instinct for self-preservation and its common sense.
It is time for the government and the public to take Xi’s saber-rattling at face value, before it is too late.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with