As expected, after the mathematics portion of the General Scholastic Ability Test (GSAT) was criticized last year for being too easy, the pendulum has swung back, with students calling this year’s exam the most difficult ever.
Some graduates have asked if teachers were trying to get revenge for last year’s complaints, and many students have decided to take the optional Advanced Subjects Test (AST) scheduled for July.
Looking at previous GSATs, the math portion in 2009 was the most difficult, as the average score of the top 1 percent was a mere 89.55 points, the only time that the average dipped below 90 points. More data are needed to determine if this year’s exam was truly the most difficult.
After too many students obtained the 15th grade — the highest grade of each subject — in math last year, the question is how many students would obtain that level this year.
The root of the issue lies in the fluctuating difficulty of the country’s largest college entrance exam. Only by stabilizing the difficulty would it be possible to help students adequately prepare for the exams, without having to worry that the questions might be too hard or too easy.
By doing so, it would be possible to also increase “test differentiation,” and effectively distinguish between high and low-performing students to help colleges and universities enroll the students most suitable for them.
Despite the high math test differentiation last year, the difficulty of the exam was seriously flawed, as one in every nine students had a perfect score, requiring additional rounds of applicant screening at universities.
Moreover, faced with the difficulty of this year’s test, students who could have gained a 15th grade last year might only obtain a 10th grade this year. They will inevitably bemoan that they were born at the wrong time, as a Chinese saying goes. It would also affect the credibility of the GSAT.
Finally, the low birthrate means that applicant numbers and admission quotas for the AST have declined annually, resulting in the GSAT becoming the primary admission channel for most high-school graduates.
The original goal of the GSAT was to evaluate students’ general scholastic ability, serving as a basic admission threshold, while the 15 grades in each subject are considered threshold criteria.
In the past few years, GSAT results have been treated as scores that compare and rank students against one another in a “norm-referenced test.”
Besides, since each GSAT subject is based mainly on multiple-choice questions, students still have a chance to score by guessing randomly even if they do not know the correct answers. Under such circumstances, it would be difficult to treat the aspects of both test differentiation and test difficulty as key aspects.
Perhaps it is time to adjust the 15-grade system for each GSAT subject, and universities should not blindly give more importance to the multichannel school admission system over the results of paper-based tests.
For the former, interviews with applicants take a lot of time and energy, while simply looking at a student’s learning portfolios can be cold and unrealistic.
Would it really be possible to discover pearls buried in the sand using the multichannel school admission system as it is claimed? Are the current selection and recommendation channels not enough? The education authorities should take the concerns of teachers, parents and students seriously.
Lin Po-kuan is a junior-high school teacher.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Chinese state-owned companies COSCO Shipping Corporation and China Merchants have a 30 percent stake in Kaohsiung Port’s Kao Ming Container Terminal (Terminal No. 6) and COSCO leases Berths 65 and 66. It is extremely dangerous to allow Chinese companies or state-owned companies to operate critical infrastructure. Deterrence theorists are familiar with the concepts of deterrence “by punishment” and “by denial.” Deterrence by punishment threatens an aggressor with prohibitive costs (like retaliation or sanctions) that outweigh the benefits of their action, while deterrence by denial aims to make an attack so difficult that it becomes pointless. Elbridge Colby, currently serving as the Under
Apart from the first arms sales approval for Taiwan since US President Donald Trump took office, last month also witnessed another milestone for Taiwan-US relations. Trump signed the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act into law on Tuesday. Its passing without objection in the US Senate underscores how bipartisan US support for Taiwan has evolved. The new law would further help normalize exchanges between Taiwanese and US government officials. We have already seen a flurry of visits to Washington earlier this summer, not only with Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍), but also delegations led by National Security Council Secretary-General Joseph Wu
Ho Ying-lu (何鷹鷺), a Chinese spouse who was a member of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) Central Standing Committee, on Wednesday last week resigned from the KMT, accusing the party of failing to clarify its “one China” policy. In a video released in October, Ho, wearing a T-shirt featuring a portrait of Mao Zedong (毛澤東), said she hoped that Taiwan would “soon return to the embrace of the motherland” and “quickly unify — that is my purpose and my responsibility.” The KMT’s Disciplinary Committee on Nov. 19 announced that Ho had been suspended from her position on the committee, although she was
Two mayors have invited Japanese pop icon Ayumi Hamasaki to perform in their cities after her Shanghai concert was abruptly canceled on Saturday last week, a decision widely interpreted as fallout from the latest political spat between Japan and China. Organizers in Shanghai pulled Hamasaki’s show at the last minute, citing force majeure, a justification that convinced few. The cancelation came shortly after Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi remarked that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could prompt a military response from Tokyo — comments that angered Beijing and triggered a series of retaliatory moves. Hamasaki received an immediate show of support from
RSS