With confirmation that US President Donald Trump was indeed defeated by US president-elect Joe Biden, there is a sense that a dangerous and sensitive time has arrived for the Taiwan Strait, not knowing exactly what antics Trump might get up to that might exacerbate cross-strait tensions.
Despite the US Congress having passed several “Taiwan-friendly” laws over the past few years, the sense of relief these have created has been mitigated by a sense of fear — relief that Taiwan-US relations are improving, but fear that Sino-US relations are tanking and that Taiwan might get caught in the middle.
The Republic of China (ROC) has been sold out by the US twice before. The first and most well-known occasion was when the China White Paper was published by the US Department of State in 1949, accounting for the circumstances that led to the US’ “loss of China” and its abandonment of Taiwan.
Then there was the breaking of ties with Taiwan in 1978, causing great anxiety in the nation after it lost its most important ally overnight.
For the ROC, Taiwan-US relations are important, but Sino-US ties are also extremely important.
Moreover, one set of ties affects the other.
If Sino-US relations are tense, the ROC is between a rock and a hard place: It does not have the luxury of stepping outside the situation. The US can use Taiwan as a bargaining chip against China, and China considers Taiwan a core value, in which it would not accept US intervention.
Beijing insists that any country wanting to set up diplomatic relations with it adheres to the “one China” principle, and the US is no exception.
This is how the US can have its Taiwan Relations Act, but also have signed the Three Joint Communiques as the basis for bilateral exchanges with China, while the US’ Taiwan Travel Act, signed into law by Trump, is tantamount to a blowing a huge hole into the “one China principle.”
Beijing would not simply sit idly by and watch the situation evolve in this way without doing anything about it. It would have no choice but to respond, and respond strongly.
As far as the authorities in Beijing are concerned, it is utterly intolerable that the Taiwan Travel Act has become law, but for Taiwanese and US officials to actually meet would be something else entirely.
This grand courtesy extended to Taiwan would touch a raw nerve in cross-strait relations.
Taiwan has become a puppet of the US and has no say in the matter. How ironic.
The US’ “Taiwan-friendly” legislation is not the manna from heaven it is portrayed to be. It is the US using Taiwan to needle China.
Taiwan’s future is in the hands of others and that is the lot that Taiwanese have to contend with. The US is acting in its own interests and cares little about what fate befalls Taiwan.
Caught between the US and China, Taiwan is unable to escape its fate.
If Washington truly cared about Taiwan, it would help the nation in trade and not use it as a bargaining chip over the sensitive issue of the “one China” principle, trying to force China to sacrifice some of its trade interests and relent to US demands.
Taiwan is not a US colony, neither is it a US protectorate. It needs to have some sense of its sovereignty and independence, and the self-respect to tell the world that it desires to have cross-strait ties and relations with the US progress at the same time.
Chu Yen-kuei is a lecturer in law at National Open University.
Translated by Paul Cooper
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the