With confirmation that US President Donald Trump was indeed defeated by US president-elect Joe Biden, there is a sense that a dangerous and sensitive time has arrived for the Taiwan Strait, not knowing exactly what antics Trump might get up to that might exacerbate cross-strait tensions.
Despite the US Congress having passed several “Taiwan-friendly” laws over the past few years, the sense of relief these have created has been mitigated by a sense of fear — relief that Taiwan-US relations are improving, but fear that Sino-US relations are tanking and that Taiwan might get caught in the middle.
The Republic of China (ROC) has been sold out by the US twice before. The first and most well-known occasion was when the China White Paper was published by the US Department of State in 1949, accounting for the circumstances that led to the US’ “loss of China” and its abandonment of Taiwan.
Then there was the breaking of ties with Taiwan in 1978, causing great anxiety in the nation after it lost its most important ally overnight.
For the ROC, Taiwan-US relations are important, but Sino-US ties are also extremely important.
Moreover, one set of ties affects the other.
If Sino-US relations are tense, the ROC is between a rock and a hard place: It does not have the luxury of stepping outside the situation. The US can use Taiwan as a bargaining chip against China, and China considers Taiwan a core value, in which it would not accept US intervention.
Beijing insists that any country wanting to set up diplomatic relations with it adheres to the “one China” principle, and the US is no exception.
This is how the US can have its Taiwan Relations Act, but also have signed the Three Joint Communiques as the basis for bilateral exchanges with China, while the US’ Taiwan Travel Act, signed into law by Trump, is tantamount to a blowing a huge hole into the “one China principle.”
Beijing would not simply sit idly by and watch the situation evolve in this way without doing anything about it. It would have no choice but to respond, and respond strongly.
As far as the authorities in Beijing are concerned, it is utterly intolerable that the Taiwan Travel Act has become law, but for Taiwanese and US officials to actually meet would be something else entirely.
This grand courtesy extended to Taiwan would touch a raw nerve in cross-strait relations.
Taiwan has become a puppet of the US and has no say in the matter. How ironic.
The US’ “Taiwan-friendly” legislation is not the manna from heaven it is portrayed to be. It is the US using Taiwan to needle China.
Taiwan’s future is in the hands of others and that is the lot that Taiwanese have to contend with. The US is acting in its own interests and cares little about what fate befalls Taiwan.
Caught between the US and China, Taiwan is unable to escape its fate.
If Washington truly cared about Taiwan, it would help the nation in trade and not use it as a bargaining chip over the sensitive issue of the “one China” principle, trying to force China to sacrifice some of its trade interests and relent to US demands.
Taiwan is not a US colony, neither is it a US protectorate. It needs to have some sense of its sovereignty and independence, and the self-respect to tell the world that it desires to have cross-strait ties and relations with the US progress at the same time.
Chu Yen-kuei is a lecturer in law at National Open University.
Translated by Paul Cooper
The White House’s decision to take a 9.9 percent stake in Intel Corp is looking like very shrewd business indeed. Since the government bought in at US$20.47 a share last August, the US chipmaker’s surging stock price has delivered the US a US$43 billion return. One of the reasons the investment has so far proved so sound is that the White House has made sure of it. According to The Wall Street Journal, Howard personally pushed deals on Intel’s behalf with some of the most lucrative clients imaginable. They include Nvidia Corp, the company at the heart of the AI
In a Taiwanese university classroom, a lecturer asks in English: “Can anyone give me an example from Taiwan?” Students look down. No one answers. After class, one student writes on the course platform in Mandarin: “I understood the concept, but I didn’t know how to answer in English.” That moment highlights a key issue in Taiwan’s English-medium instruction (EMI) reform: It is not just about more English-taught courses, but whether students can learn, participate and belong. EMI expansion is part of the Bilingual 2030 policy and the Ministry of Education’s BEST Program, aiming to improve English ability, support EMI teaching
The Ministry of the Interior, working with the navy and coast guard, is organizing Taiwan’s first joint exercise simulating escort tankers carrying liquefied natural gas (LNG) and oil through a Chinese blockade. The drills simulate fuel transport along three maritime corridors leading toward Japan, the Philippines and the US. Deputy Minister of the Interior Sawyer Mars (馬士元) said that a blockade of the Taiwan Strait would amount to “almost a 100 percent blockade of the regional energy supply.” Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo said planning to counter a blockade is standard practice in Taipei. While the exercise is limited in
A single photograph can cut through a lot of noise, but it can also be used to misrepresent the truth. At the very least, it can concentrate the mind on something that requires further investigation. On Monday last week, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation CEO Tai Hsia-ling (戴遐齡) and former National Security Council secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) held a news conference in which they showed a photograph of former foundation CEO Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑), now Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) deputy chairman. In the image Hsiao is seated next to Xiamen Taiwan Businessmen Association chairman Han Ying-huan (韓螢煥). The two men were holding