The abductors moved with an ease and stealth that suggested they had done this before. As Qayyum (his name has been changed to protect his identity) and his family slept, 12 masked and uniformed soldiers used a ladder to scale the gate of the house, in an affluent neighborhood of the Pakistani city of Quetta in Balochistan.
The family woke as they burst in, but the officers silenced them with an order: Don’t scream or we will beat you. One demanded Qayyum’s national identity card.
“Bring your phone and laptop,” an officer barked.
Illustration: Mountain People
A bag was shoved over Qayyum’s head, and he was dragged outside and thrown into the back of a car.
Qayyum, a Pakistani government official, did not know why he had been seized, but he knew what was happening.
Extrajudicial abductions and enforced disappearances by shadowy military agencies have been a feature of life in Pakistan for two decades. Those suspected of having ties to terrorists, insurgents or activists are picked up and taken to secret detention centers, without trial or official judicial process.
There they face days, months or even years of torture.
Some are eventually released, but most are never seen again.
Those weeks in August 2014 were the worst of Qayyum’s life. Deep in a covert detention center, he was left outside the torture cell to listen as four others were beaten. One after another, the men were brought out, unconscious, bloody and limp, carried on the shoulders of masked men, until finally it was his turn.
“Once I entered the torture cell, a soldier was told to strip me,” Qayyum says. “I started begging them not to dishonor me, I was crying and pleading: ‘Please don’t disgrace me.’ I was laid down on the floor and someone started hitting my buttocks with a leather belt.”
Qayyum never saw their faces. They whipped him until he was bleeding all over and broke his fingers.
“I felt then I was already dead, that I could never live having suffered such humiliation,” he says.
Like the others before him, Qayyum left the torture cell unconscious.
The next night after prayers he was taken back to the cell, and this time the officers had specific questions: what he knew about four security personnel killed in Quetta, and whether he had met with a man called M (his name has been changed to protect his identity).
“The interrogator kept asking: ‘Who is M? When did you last meet him?’” Qayyum says. “I replied that there must be some miscommunication, I do not know this person, I’m not the person you require. Suddenly he gave me an electric shock on my testicles. I fell and he kept giving me electric shocks around my head, face and neck.”
Some nights his head was plunged into buckets of icy water, pushing him to the brink of drowning, all the while asking him the same questions he could not answer.
However, Qayyum still considered himself one of the lucky ones. After weeks of torture, the officers finally let him go, dumping him on the streets of Quetta at night with a warning never to speak of what had happened.
“I was not the person they were looking for, but those weeks in a torture cell killed my spirit and ambition,” he says. “I was brought back as a dead body.”
“Disappearing” is nothing new in Pakistan, justified by the military as an essential tool of national security in a country that has seen thousands die in attacks by Islamic militants and separatist insurgents.
It began in the 1970s, but became a standard practice of Pakistan’s security agencies, in particular the shadowy spy agency Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), after 2001.
As Pakistan became central to the US “war on terror,” ISI and paramilitary forces rounded up hundreds of suspected al-Qaeda militants for the US administration, who secretly shipped them to Guantanamo Bay.
Human rights groups have documented how widespread and entrenched the practice has become, particularly by ISI, which has been accused of operating a “state within a state” in Pakistan and is reported to employ more than 10,000 operatives, most serving army officers.
Abduction targets are suspected Islamic or separatist militants, but also political opponents, activists, students, politicians, human rights defenders, journalists and lawyers, all picked up without due process and no information given to the family left behind.
The question that haunts Pakistan is why extrajudicial kidnappings and torture continue, even as the country has made the transition from the military dictatorships and coups that had defined the nation since its formation in 1947, to the democratic civilian governments in power since 2008.
In opposition, Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan repeatedly pledged to end the practice, but since he took office in 2018, the disappearances have continued — some say escalated — while accountability seems as elusive as ever.
According to the UN Working Group on Enforced and Involuntary Disappearances, they have 1,144 cases of allegations of enforced disappearances from Pakistan from 1980 to last year, with 731 still missing.
However, these numbers barely scratch the surface. Most cases never reach the UN.
Pakistan’s security agencies regularly deny complicity in disappearances. In the rare court hearings that have occurred, ISI and military officers have maintained that victims are hiding out in the mountains or were killed by the Taliban.
ISI declined to comment on the record.
One high-ranking military intelligence official spoke on condition of anonymity.
“It is wrong to say these people were disappeared,” he said. “They are people who get killed when they attack us [the military] on border posts or get killed in Afghanistan and border regions; they are insurgents and terrorists who have been put in jail or run away to be an illegal immigrant in Europe and died en route. It is politicians who stir up the issue to play to people’s emotions.”
State-led efforts to tackle the issue have failed. In 2006, the Pakistani Supreme Court began hearing cases about the nation’s “disappeared,” but then a state of emergency was declared by then-Pakistani prime minister Pervez Musharraf less than a year later and all judges deposed.
In 2011, Pakistan set up the Commission of Inquiry on Enforced Disappearances, with a mandate to trace the missing and hold those responsible for the disappearances to account.
In September a damning report by the International Commission of Jurists starkly highlighted that in nine years the commission had failed to hold a single perpetrator responsible.
“Enforced disappearances not just continue to take place here, they have reached a level of brazenness inconceivable a few years ago,” the commission says.
Pakistan military’s power and influence remain sacrosanct.
In opposition, Khan was seen as deferential to the army, and the backing of the military helped him to power in 2018. Khan’s administration has still not criminalized nor ratified the UN convention against enforced disappearances.
In June, the Balochistan National Party (BNP) quit its alliance with Khan’s ruling Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (Movement for Justice party) over the prime minister’s broken promise to put an end to the disappearances.
The culture of impunity is further fueled by the widespread censorship of Pakistan’s media, which has worsened under Khan due to the free rein given to the military.
Journalists, fearful of abduction themselves, feel unable to freely report on the subject.
Among the prominent victims during Khan’s tenure is Idris Khattak, a human rights defender and champion of missing persons, kidnapped in November last year.
After international pressure, in a rare admission of involvement in a forced disappearance, the military admitted that Khattak was in its custody.
He has still not been released.
Amina Masood Janjua, whose husband, Masood Janjua, has been missing since July 13, 2005, railed against what she saw as Khan’s hypocrisy.
In opposition she had met Khan and been promised justice.
“Imran Khan told me that if he becomes prime minister, not a single person would go missing, but after coming into power, Khan never replied to any of the letters I wrote him,” she says.
Balochistan, Pakistan’s resource-rich, but troubled state that borders Iran and Afghanistan, has long been the center of enforced disappearances, used to crush the province’s ongoing bloody insurgency. Anyone suspected of separatist sympathies is picked up, usually by security agencies or the paramilitary Frontier Corps.
According to Voice for Baloch Missing Persons (VBMP), a human rights organization, more than 6,000 people are still missing from Balochistan.
Since 2009, 1,400 people who were abducted by security forces have been found dead, their bodies riddled with bullets and drill holes, or bearing signs of torture and mutilation.
As insurgent activity has increased in Balochistan over the past 18 months, so too have the disappearances.
From January to August, 139 people were forcibly abducted from Balochistan, while only 84 have been released.
Former Balochistan chief minister Abdul Malik says that the “warlike” situation in Balochistan means that “just and unjust people get abducted.”
“These people are abducted by the security forces, though they never admit to doing it,” he says.
A Balochistan state government spokesperson says they “recognize the issue and are resolving it. About 4,000 people have been released.”
In Sindh Province, where the government recently banned several nationalist organizations, 152 people, mostly political activists, are registered as missing, according to the Voice For Missing Persons of Sindh.
In the region’s main city of Karachi, about 250 kidnap victims have never been seen again, says Asad Butt of the human rights commission of Pakistan.
Currently a dozen relatives of Sindh’s disappeared are marching the 2,400km from Karachi to the capital, Islamabad, to demand answers and justice from the government, a protest walk that will take three months.
It is an issue that haunts the former Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) of Pakistan, a wartorn and formerly autonomous area, devastated by domestic and foreign military offensives, and a longstanding hub for terrorist groups such as the Taliban.
Political activist Manzoor Pashteen recently began a movement to highlight disappearances in the region.
“Since the military operations began in former FATA in 2007-2008, around 8,000 people have been abducted and only 1,500 have been released,” he says.
Pashteen says the disappearances continue unchallenged because “the issue can’t be resolved without punishing the perpetrators and they know they are above the law.”
“Whenever anyone talks against the enforced disappearances — lawyers, activists, journalists and politicians — they all get threatened, abducted and sometimes killed,” Pashteen says. “What can be more cruel than this?”
In Balochistan’s capital, Quetta, so many families have experienced a relative being abducted that a protest camp has been a mainstay of the city for more than a decade.
Dozens gather daily with crumpled photographs of fathers, sons and brothers who have disappeared.
Among them is Bibi Ganj Malik, whose son Ghulam Farooq was abducted, allegedly by security agencies, on June 2, 2015.
“Authorities should present Farooq in the court of law. If my son has committed any crime or found guilty, he should be punished, but at least, don’t hide him in dark torture cells,” she says.
Malik never saw her son again. She died soon after speaking to the Guardian.
In 2013, a group from the Quetta camp marched to Islamabad to demand the release of family members, but they faced threats and police intimidation along the way.
Meanwhile, the body count keeps rising.
In September, in Chaghi, Balochistan, a decomposed body was found.
Hafeezullah Mohammed Hasni was abducted from his home on Aug. 30, 2016, and a military officer demanded 6.8 million rupees (US$42,400) for his release.
Although the family paid the money and the officer was later imprisoned for corruption, Hasni was still not released. Every day for the past four years, his daughter Muqaddas, only one year old when her father was taken, had stood at the protest camp in Quetta holding his picture.
The coroner said that Hasni had been dead for at least three years.
His mother fainted at the news and it was his brother who had to identify the mutilated body.
“His clothes, shoes, socks, are the same that he wore that day,” was all his brother Nematullah could utter.
For many, the agony is compounded by the fact they never recover a body.
Abdul Wahid, a professor of English in Quetta, spoke of the pain of not knowing what happened to his son, Rehmatullah, who was abducted on Jan. 18, 2015, as he drove home in the days before his upcoming wedding.
Wahid believes the paramilitary Frontier Corps is responsible, but has not registered an official case into his kidnapping.
“There are thousands of registered cases of enforced disappearances,” says Wahid, his voice shaking with grief. “Has anyone got justice from courts and police? We can’t fight the powerful and so we just pray that they release my son.”
Pausing to wipe away tears, he says: “It is terrifying that I don’t know whether my son is alive or dead. I have to lie to my parents that their grandson will come back soon.”
For the thousands of wives and fiancees of men who disappear, life remains in limbo. Tradition dictates that they cannot remarry or break their engagement without a body, so they are often outcast from society, neither a wife nor a widow.
Rehana, fiancee of missing Rehmatullah, has been waiting more than five years.
“We were both so happy that we were going to get married, but all of a sudden everything vanished,” Rehana says. “I pray to God he’s safe and comes back. I am waiting for him.”
Pakistani Minister of Human Rights Shireen Mazari said that a bill criminalizing enforced disappearances is in progress.
“We have drafted a bill. Law ministry has it. Consultation is going on with all stakeholders on this,” Mazari says.
However, the Guardian understands that the Pakistani Ministry of Law and Justice has made multiple objections to the bill and it has not been presented to parliament.
For those who do return, the fear and information blackout around the abductions can be hard to bear. Many suffer post-traumatic stress.
Mamnoon (his name has been changed to protect his identity) was picked up by paramilitaries during dinner with friends at a crowded hotel in Karachi in October 2017.
After two days of beatings and torture for information on a man he barely knew, Mamnoon was locked in a small dark cell on his own, where he felt himself drift into madness.
“I saw nobody except one person used to visit me and tell me I was finished, that they will kill me and throw away my dead body,” he says.
After a year in isolation, Mamnoon was released, but flashbacks regularly take him back to that dark cell.
He has no expectation of justice.
“This is my second life,” he says.
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Last week, Nvidia chief executive officer Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) unveiled the location of Nvidia’s new Taipei headquarters and announced plans to build the world’s first large-scale artificial intelligence (AI) supercomputer in Taiwan. In Taipei, Huang’s announcement was welcomed as a milestone for Taiwan’s tech industry. However, beneath the excitement lies a significant question: Can Taiwan’s electricity infrastructure, especially its renewable energy supply, keep up with growing demand from AI chipmaking? Despite its leadership in digital hardware, Taiwan lags behind in renewable energy adoption. Moreover, the electricity grid is already experiencing supply shortages. As Taiwan’s role in AI manufacturing expands, it is critical that
RSS