Some in the world’s chocolate markets see a hefty premium charged by the largest cocoa producers as blunt instrument wielded by the OPEC of confections — a tool of a faraway cartel that artificially inflates the price of a precious commodity.
To the leaders of Ivory Coast and Ghana, where most of the world’s cocoa is produced, the argument is something else entirely: a lifeline for farmers who would otherwise be held hostage to giant corporations.
Now those competing viewpoints — globalization reduced to a chocolate bar — have collided in spectacular fashion, thrusting the normally secretive machinations of some of the world’s biggest chocolate companies, cocoa traders and processors into rare public view.
Illustration: Tania Chou
The governments of Ivory Coast and Ghana have accused Hershey Co — the maker of Kisses, Reese’s and other chocolate treats — of trying to skirt around the US$363-a-tonne premium they have slapped on cocoa, aimed at boosting incomes for hard-pressed farmers. They also said Mars Inc changed its buying patterns to avoid paying the charge.
Hershey last month upended markets when it unexpectedly bought large amounts of cocoa through the futures market, squeezing the New York contract.
“Some chocolatiers and trade houses have adopted covert strategies to circumvent the farmer income improvement mechanism with the aim of collapsing it,” Le Conseil du Cafe-Cacao managing director Yves Kone and Ghana Cocoa Board chief executive Joseph Boahen Aidoo said in a statement on Monday, adding that they would do “whatever is within our power to protect the over 3 million farmers from impoverishment.”
In retaliation, Ivory Coast and Ghana suspended all of the Pennsylvania-based company’s sustainability programs, a move that could hurt sales to ethically minded consumers.
“It is unfortunate that Cote d’Ivoire and Ghana have elected to distribute a misleading statement this morning and jeopardize such critical programs that directly benefit cocoa farmers,” Hershey said in a statement, adding that it was paying the premium, known as the Living Income Differential (LID), for cocoa purchases from the 2020-2021 season. “We buy a substantial supply sourced from West Africa.”
Many cocoa growers in West Africa live below the poverty line, growing beans on only 1 or 2 hectares.
Chocolate makers and cocoa processors agreed to pay the West African nations the LID and other charges on top of futures prices, but after the COVID-19 pandemic slashed demand, companies needed to cut costs to weather a second wave of lockdowns from Paris to Los Angeles.
Since then, some exporters in Ivory Coast stopped buying cocoa, asking to pay a smaller quality premium known as the Country Differential, making it harder for the nation to sell about 250,000 tonnes of cocoa still left on the books.
There has also been reluctance to pay the charge in Ghana.
“Ivory Coast and Ghana might be sending a stern warning to the trade, but they also need to be able to sell their cocoa of which they have plenty of,” said Judy Ganes, president of J. Ganes Consulting, who has followed the cocoa market for more than 30 years and previously worked for Merrill Lynch. “This is a stare down for sure with gloves off, and [it] will be interesting to see who blinks first.”
Hershey’s unexpected move to source cocoa through the exchange sent this month’s contracts on ICE Futures to a record premium over March. The company highlighted at the time that it was buying cocoa with the LID, but that there were still beans in the market that were sold prior to the implementation of the premium.
Hershey also said it needed cocoa from other origins to keep the consistency and taste its customers expect.
“The conspiracy and machinations by your company to evade the payment of the LID demonstrates your passive commitment to improve the incomes of three million West African cocoa farmers,” Kone and Aidoo said in a letter to Hershey on Monday, adding that failure to comply with the orders would mean companies could lose their licenses to operate in the nations.
The regulators also took aim at Mars, saying that the maker of Twix migrated the bulk of its cocoa butter purchases from its traditional processors, buying from Asian grinders JB Cocoa and Guan Chong Berhad instead just to avoid paying the premium.
Mars said it “categorically disagrees” with the allegations and highlighted that it was the first major manufacturer to support the LID.
The accusations are a further hit to the reputations of chocolate makers, which have come increasingly under pressure for their role in deforestation, child labor and poverty.
Earlier this year, a report sponsored by the US government said that child labor worsened a decade after the US$100 billion chocolate industry pledged to reduce it.
Hershey is an especially big name, as an icon whose bars helped power US troops across Europe during World War II.
Companies running sustainability programs on behalf of Hershey would also be barred from operating them, the nations said.
The move could have “significant implications for cocoa farmers and local communities,” said Antonie Fountain, managing director at the Voice Network, which has called for more industry regulation.
The group argued in its 2020 Cocoa Barometer report that farmers need to receive about US$2,800 a tonne, up from US$1,600 a tonne.
“Whatever happened in the futures market in the past two weeks has been entirely legal, the question is whether these things should be legal or whether you should be able to force all companies to pay a fair price to farmers,” Fountain said. “Shutting down the sustainability programs is exactly the wrong thing to do because it hurts the farmer.”
Ivory Coast and Ghana also accused Chicago-based cocoa processor Blommer Chocolate Co, which usually processes large amounts of beans for Hershey, of collaborating, according to a separate letter sent to the Cocoa Merchants’ Association of America in which the nations withdrew their membership from the group.
“We regret that there has been an expression of doubt about the industry’s support of cocoa farmer income levels and, more specifically, the Living Income Differential,” Blommer said in a statement on Tuesday. “Despite the impact of COVID-19 on chocolate demand, Blommer expects to purchase its average annual tonnage of cocoa from Cote d’Ivoire and Ghana with full LID pricing for delivery in calendar 2021, with a majority having already been purchased to date.”
The nations also said that Olam International Inc, the third-largest cocoa processor, pursued a strategy of reducing the amount of Ghana and Ivory Coast beans from its recipes.
The Singapore-based trader reiterated its “strong support” for farmers and boosting their incomes, in line with the objectives of the LID.
“As one of the largest buyers of cocoa from Cote d’Ivoire and Ghana, our commitment is unwavering and we continue to support and purchase cocoa from both countries,’ Olam head of cocoa Gerry Manley said.
Ivory Coast’s regulator confirmed the letters and the statement. Ghana Cocoa Board spokesman Fiifi Boafo could not comment when reached by telephone on Monday.
The cocoa squeeze in New York might not be as bad for Ghana and Ivory Coast as the nations have argued so far. That is because Hershey’s purchase, while big for an exchange delivery, is only a fraction of their total production. With New York prices much higher than London futures, which form the basis to which the LID premium is added, there is now a bigger incentive for other chocolate makers to buy again in the physical market, brokers and traders said.
Ivory Coast and Ghana have in the past threatened to suspend chocolate firms’ sustainability programs to get them to buy cocoa with the LID, a tactic that has previously worked, but market conditions are “vastly different” now, Ganes said.
While many companies have supported the idea of boosting farmer incomes, many have struggled to manage risk as the LID and other surcharges cannot be hedged. That becomes even more acute at times of slowing demand.
The problems Ivory Coast and Ghana “face now are a direct result of trying to impose a poorly thought out premium for all their cocoa no matter how much they produce,” said Derek Chambers, a former head of cocoa at Sucden, who retired in 2018 after 50 years trading. “Both origins will be unable to sell their all their cocoa and will be left at the end of the season with surplus stocks. This is no way at all to help their farmers.”
Ivory Coast and Ghana also said that they are reviewing their membership of the Federation of Cocoa Commerce (FCC) in London, and “reconsidering the incentives and the licenses granted to members of the FCC which are directly or subtly rejecting LID.”
Former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo delivered a very short, succinct and accurate speech in regards to the US relationship with Taiwan in November last year. This information has again angered Beijing, which has stated that the existence of a free and independent Taiwan will not be tolerated. Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Wang Wenbin (汪文斌) has said Pompeo’s language is interfering with the sovereignty of China. Pompeo was stating the facts. Taiwan has never been a part of the People’s Republic of China or the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), therefore it is not a territory of China. The
No longer content to hide its capabilities and ambition, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) appears intent on alerting the world to its newfound strength by conducting various forms of military “gray zone” warfare in the Indo-Pacific region. One area of particular concern is the almost daily incursions by Chinese warplanes into Taiwan’s air defense identification zone (ADIZ). Last year, Chinese warplanes logged a record 380 incursions into Taiwan’s ADIZ, causing Taipei to scramble its fighter jets, issue warnings and activate missile defense systems. On Monday last week, Taiwan saw 25 Chinese military aircraft, including 14 Shenyang J-16 fighters, four Chengdu J-10
Where is the world’s disposition today vis-a-vis the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)? Is it similar to that in Munich, September 1938 when Europe’s powers appeased Adolf Hitler over the “Sudetenland,” despite existing treaty commitments? In other words, analogous to the failure to recognize the PRC’s aggressive intent and to mobilize in response to serial CCP outrages, e.g., Tiananmen and South China Sea; suppression of Hong Kong in violation of a treaty agreement; the internment and genocide of the Uighurs, and its complicity in the death of nearly 3 million people globally via its Wuhan Coronavirus. Do these “passes” now amount to
The EU on Wednesday cohosted a Global Cooperation and Training Framework workshop with Taiwan and the US. They discussed the restructuring of the global supply chain and joint financing of small and medium-sized enterprises. This was the first time the EU, represented by European Economic and Trade Office in Taiwan Director Filip Grzegorzewski, cohosted such an event. Launched in 2015, the framework aims to help bring Taiwan’s expertise to the global stage. Essentially, it was designed to find ways to include Taiwan in global efforts, as it remains excluded from international organizations. With Taiwan’s successful containment of COVID-19 and its vital role