The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) agreement, initiated in 2011, was finally signed at an ASEAN summit on Nov. 15.
The RCEP was created mainly by integrating the five free-trade agreements of ASEAN.
However, due to the big differences between the agreements and the opinions of member countries, negotiations progressed slowly. During the course of negotiations, seven RCEP members joined the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), while several free-trade agreements also took effect among the members.
The biggest regret for the RCEP might be India’s withdrawal during the later stages of negotiations due to concerns about the pact’s effects on the country. Although the RCEP still welcomes India to return at any time, it is unlikely that it will join in the near future.
Although India is missing from the agreement, the GDP and trade value of the 15 member states still account for about 30 percent of global GDP and one-third of the global population — both of which are higher than the CPTPP’s figures.
The RCEP also connects China with Japan, and Japan with South Korea, thus creating a link that was missing, as there were no free-trade agreements between these countries. Therefore, it reduces the need for free-trade agreements between them.
In particular, since Japan and China are the only two countries in the RCEP that had not entered into an free-trade agreement with each other, China offers Japan the largest tariff reductions.
Coupled with the fact that Japan is the RCEP member country that exports the most to China, Japan would undoubtedly be the country to benefit the most from the RCEP.
Although neither the breadth nor the depth of the RCEP is as far reaching as that of the CPTPP, there would still be zero tariffs on more than 90 percent of products in the goods market.
The service industry market, which was relatively closed in the past, would also be opened to a great degree. It is foreseeable that the RCEP would accelerate the deepening of regional economy and trade.
This is probably particularly true for China. Given the US-China trade dispute and the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, many companies have withdrawn from China and are seeking to decouple from the “red supply chain.”
The RCEP undoubtedly provides China with an excellent stage to take countermeasures to these developments. Although the agreement is mainly an integration of ASEAN free-trade agreements, China, whose GDP accounts for nearly 60 percent of the RCEP’s total GDP, holds a pivotal position.
As the RCEP’s members are important countries in China’s Belt and Road Initiative, Beijing is likely to use the pact to deepen its economic and trade links with these countries to resist the global decoupling from China.
It would do so based on its economic scale, and using market deregulation as an incentive and industrial cooperation as a means.
The RCEP would also prompt the US to strengthen its connection with Asia as a counterbalance to China. Returning to the CPTPP, promoting supply chain cooperation and strengthening the Indo-Pacific strategic layout might be possible options for the new administration of US president-elect Joe Biden.
RCEP member countries account for nearly 70 percent of Taiwan’s exports. Since the free-trade agreements between RCEP members have already taken effect, they have already had an effect on Taiwan, which is still ongoing.
Once the RCEP implements comprehensive tariff cuts, that would have an effect on Taiwan in the form of another wave of trade redirection.
In addition, because the RCEP country of origin rules can help strengthen the integration of the regional supply chain and attract foreign investment, it would have a crowding-out effect on Taiwan.
Given cross-strait relations and China’s influence on the RCEP, joining the RCEP is out of reach for Taiwan, while Taiwan’s accession to the CPTPP and the establishment of bilateral free-trade agreements would also be difficult to realize.
Although Taiwan’s participation in regional economic integration is being hindered, it should continue to seek opportunities to break through. In response to the drastic changes in the global economic and trade environment, all countries seek to organize supply chain alliances to ensure industrial safety, forming a new model of regional economic cooperation.
Taiwan should make use of its own manufacturing advantages to cut into the supply chain alliance system, and adopt flexible region-to-region and industry-to-industry cooperation as a way to bridge the gap caused by not being able to participate in regional economic integration.
Liu Da-nien is director of the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research’s Regional Development Study Center.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
The bird flu outbreak at US dairy farms keeps finding alarming new ways to surprise scientists. Last week, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) confirmed that H5N1 is spreading not just from birds to herds, but among cows. Meanwhile, media reports say that an unknown number of cows are asymptomatic. Although the risk to humans is still low, it is clear that far more work needs to be done to get a handle on the reach of the virus and how it is being transmitted. That would require the USDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to get
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
On April 11, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida delivered a speech at a joint meeting of the US Congress in Washington, in which he said that “China’s current external stance and military actions present an unprecedented and the greatest strategic challenge … to the peace and stability of the international community.” Kishida emphasized Japan’s role as “the US’ closest ally.” “The international order that the US worked for generations to build is facing new challenges,” Kishida said. “I understand it is a heavy burden to carry such hopes on your shoulders,” he said. “Japan is already standing shoulder to shoulder
Former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) used to push for reforms to protect Taiwan by adopting the “three noes” policy as well as “Taiwanization.” Later, then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) wished to save the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) by pushing for the party’s “localization,” hoping to compete with homegrown political parties as a pro-Taiwan KMT. However, the present-day members of the KMT do not know what they are talking about, and do not heed the two former presidents’ words, so the party has suffered a third consecutive defeat in the January presidential election. Soon after gaining power with the help of the KMT’s