As global central banks embark on aggressive monetary easing to revive economies hit by the COVID-19 pandemic, the low interest rates and ample liquidity have lifted housing prices and transaction volume in the past few months, and Taiwan is no exception.
Deputy Minister of the Interior Hua Ching-chun (花敬群) on Friday said that some speculative activities appear to have taken hold in the property market and various ministries have discussed policies to curb property speculation — such as selective credit controls by the central bank, property tax reforms by the Ministry of Finance and restrictions on purchasing by the Ministry of the Interior.
Is Taiwan at risk of experiencing a property bubble? The release on Thursday of the minutes of the central bank’s latest quarterly policymaking meeting shed some light on the issue.
Several central bank board directors addressed the problems in the domestic housing market during the Sept. 17 meeting, with one saying that the bank needs to pay attention to the signs of a property bubble and draw up necessary measures.
Another suggested that the bank act pre-emptively before people develop unrealistic expectations for the housing market, while another urged a coordinated effort by the central bank, ministries and local governments to tackle problems in the housing market.
National Development Council Minister Kung Ming-hsin (龔明鑫) on Oct. 21 said that the council is considering creating a business climate index to monitor changes in the housing market to help policymakers better grasp the market’s pulse.
The government is obviously keeping an eye on rising housing prices, as the issue has become politicized over the past few years. Since 2010, the issues of curbing housing prices or increasing the supply of social housing have become key topics during each major election, along with other problems such as a widening income gap and low housing affordability.
The median housing price to median annual household income ratio in Taiwan was 8.6 in the first quarter of this year, interior ministry data showed. This means a person would need to save their entire income for almost nine years without eating or drinking to be able to buy a home.
The average household in Taiwan also spent 35.3 percent of its income on mortgage payments in the first quarter, up 0.15 percent from the previous quarter and higher than the generally acceptable limit of 30 percent, the data showed.
Nevertheless, Taiwanese, especially the wealthy, consider real estate a good investment amid the government’s pro-market housing policies, as relatively low property and transaction taxes attract buyers.
Academia Sinica member and former representative to the WTO Cyrus Chu (朱敬一) in a speech on Oct. 23 said that profiting from real-estate investment is particularly attractive to rich Taiwanese, as it has become a fast way to accumulate wealth, albeit with serious side effects, such as increased social inequality and a growing income gap that has widened over the past 10 years.
The top 1 percent in Taiwan earned 11.29 percent of all income in 2017, thanks to capital gains from the stock and housing markets, Chu said, citing data collected by the Fiscal Information Agency.
The figure is expected to continue rising in the long term, he said, meaning that the top 1 percent would likely accumulate more wealth faster than all other income brackets.
A spate of housing and land tax reforms implemented in the past few years are far from perfect and allow tax evasion.
The government must tackle housing inequality seriously and continue with tax reforms, or the income gap and social discontent will only intensify.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS