President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) attaches particular importance to building up the nation’s defenses, including defense independence and reserve forces. She has repeatedly instructed the military to reform and advance the reserve system, and re-emphasized the significance of the issue in her Double Ten National Day address.
On the eve of Double Ten National Day, the Ministry of National Defense unveiled the direction of its reserve force reform, planning to increase the length and frequency of reservist call-ups for two weeks of training annually starting in 2022, while establishing a defense mobilization administration under the Executive Yuan.
In that way, the number of reservists receiving training yearly would increase from 120,000 to 260,000. Although the plan has prompted many different opinions, reserve forces are of great importance, because they are the vanguard of Taiwan’s “all-out defense” and they serve side-by-side with regular forces.
Take South Korea as an example. The ideal of its reserve policy is to arm the whole public. There are more than 3 million well-trained civil defense personnel in reserve in South Korea. They serve as the main force in the defense system when dealing with large-scale conflicts or emergencies.
The Republic of Korea Reserve Forces mainly participate in activities such as disaster response, emergency mobilization, social aid and military training during peacetime, but the South Korean government can quickly turn certain reservists into regular forces during wartime if necessary.
According to South Korea’s definition, reserve forces are comrades-in-arms of the soldiers and police protecting the country. They are compatriots who are working while fighting and fighting while working, and the main force defending the public’s freedom.
The mission for the reserve forces is that during wartime or a state of emergency they can assist the regular forces or participate in military mobilization in response to combat needs and protect the nation from being invaded or harmed by the enemy, while taking the lead in cultivating self-defense awareness among the public.
The duration of annual training for South Korean reservists varies according to the length of their military service and their military ranking.
However, the training of reserve forces is almost as tough as that of regular units. The strict training is well-known around the world, as South Korea strives to build the sharpest reservists.
South Korea has two major reserve branches, the Mobilization Reserve Forces and the Homeland Reserve Forces, and those in the former must receive regular training one day every month, as well as a three-day call-up every year. Every four years, they must participate in the four-day Ssang Yong (Twin Dragons) exercise, a field training exercise conducted by South Korea and US biannually since 2012, which is part of the Foal Eagle exercise conducted by the two countries annually.
During the drill, reserve and regular forces are generally mixed together to provide actual combat training. This enables reserve forces to enter the field as soon as possible after receiving emergency training if a war breaks out. Besides, all women are welcome to join reserve forces on a voluntary basis.
Taiwan should learn from South Korea’s reserve policy and training methods. This could help the defense ministry achieve its goal of uniting the regular and reserve forces and fulfill its plan to streamline regular troops, while expanding reserve forces to effectively improve the nation’s combat capabilities.
Chang Ling-ling is a military instructor at National Defense University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,