A misguided target
I am again sorely disappointed by the Ministry of Education’s attempts to reform English-language course offerings at universities (“Ministry to push English at universities,” Oct. 4, page 1). This gimmicky move is reminiscent of the well-intentioned but vacuous goal to promote Chinese-English bilingual education before 2030.
While globalizing by increasing the use of English at universities is indeed a possibility for Taiwan, this current approach is haphazard and inarticulate. The ministry is taking a top-down approach starting with higher education instead of elementary and secondary levels, which is problematic as professors cited in the article have pointed out.
The ministry seems to think that it can attract foreign lecturers or foreign students on a whim simply by implementing a policy here or there.
The National University of Singapore took decades building up its reputation. That was concurrent with the Singaporean government’s educational policies to make English the default mode of communication in the city-state as well as economic policies to attract investment and talent from multinational companies.
With the uncertainties around COVID-19 and increasing global tensions, the ministry’s goals seem too optimistic.
The government needs to think carefully about what it wants. Which demographic of international students is it targeting? Or is it contriving this goal simply to attract attention? It seems so.
There is also the problem of social equity. Why is the ministry investing in programs in higher education when the country fails to give most of its citizens at least a second language level in English (similar to many European countries or India)? Will English-taught degree programs exacerbate inequities of the education system?
It is no secret that Taipei and maybe Hsinchu or Kaohsiung would first get the funding, not to mention that foreigners typically only live in these cities.
I was privileged when I was selected for a bilingual education program at a public elementary school. How will the ministry ensure that universities, and more broadly the education system, provide these programs fairly?
English is a valuable asset to any individual in an economic sense. As a student in Singapore, I can see first hand how any attempt at a truly bilingual education for a vast proportion of the population is unattainable.
Two languages at native level is inherently an unstable equilibrium. Over time, one language will be favored, and in Singapore’s multiracial and international society, that language is English, the only lingua franca.
Taiwan has been promoting this language for a while now. It is time for the government, and society as a whole, to take a step back and think carefully about what role they want English to play in the future of Taiwan.
Jia Cheng Shen
Singapore
Defense starts at home
In early July, Enoch Wu (吳怡農), deputy chief executive of the New Frontier Foundation, a Democratic Progressive Party think tank, hit a snag after criticizing the annual Han Kuang military exercise, saying it is just “for show.” Recently, he has also been criticized for proposing that recruits should be able to do their military service at home.
Taking a closer look at Wu’s proposal, it is not difficult to see that he meant that soldiers should build defense capabilities in their hometowns during both peacetime and wartime. That might have been lost in the ensuing oversimplification of the issue, but the original intention was good. Although the proposal might not be practical, there is no need for excessive criticism of Wu.
The proposal was made in an joint op-ed by Wu and former chief of general staff admiral Lee Hsi-ming (李喜明) in the Apple Daily on Oct. 9.
In the article, titled “Reserve forces transformation: The building of homeland defense forces,” they said that Sweden has distributed a leaflet, titled “If crisis or war comes,” to the Swedish public to help them understand how to prepare, and that Taiwan must adjust its voluntary military system.
Next, they explained the idea of an “all-out defense,” saying that the reservist call-up system is not enough to resist the powerful military threat from the other side of the Taiwan Strait.
Finally, they advocated building a homeland defense mechanism, proposing that the reserve forces take responsibility for safeguarding their communities and hometowns.
Looking at the article, it was simply an extension of the idea that defense starts at home, and the Ministry of National Defense should use the op-ed as a reference when formulating a reservist policy.
However, Wu should engage in some self-reflection. Having served as an officer and being involved in national defense matters, he should not have called the Han Kuang exercise a show.
Shen Nai-hsun
Kaohsiung
Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention. If it makes headlines, it is because China wants to invade. Yet, those who find their way here by some twist of fate often fall in love. If you ask them why, some cite numbers showing it is one of the freest and safest countries in the world. Others talk about something harder to name: The quiet order of queues, the shared umbrellas for anyone caught in the rain, the way people stand so elderly riders can sit, the
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
Small and medium enterprises make up the backbone of Taiwan’s economy, yet large corporations such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) play a crucial role in shaping its industrial structure, economic development and global standing. The company reported a record net profit of NT$374.68 billion (US$11.41 billion) for the fourth quarter last year, a 57 percent year-on-year increase, with revenue reaching NT$868.46 billion, a 39 percent increase. Taiwan’s GDP last year was about NT$24.62 trillion, according to the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, meaning TSMC’s quarterly revenue alone accounted for about 3.5 percent of Taiwan’s GDP last year, with the company’s
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
RSS