In late 2015, ahead of the January 2016 presidential and legislative elections, then-Tainan mayor William Lai (賴清德) announced that he supported Taiwanese independence.
Former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) — who passed away on July 30 — responded by saying that if Taiwan sought independence, China would probably send the Chinese People’s Liberation Army to attack Taiwan.
Lee also emphasized that he had never said Taiwan should seek independence, because it is already independent.
Lee’s puzzling use of Mandarin and leaps of logic led to confusion and made it unclear what he really meant.
However, I can testify that he was disapproving of de jure independence many years ago.
My job relocation back to Taiwan from Los Angeles in 2006 coincided with a visit of Bruce Herschensohn, an old friend who is a professor at Pepperdine University’s School of Public Policy and the author of Taiwan: The Threatened Democracy.
I once accompanied him on a visit to Lee. Herschensohn is an ardent supporter of the Democratic Progressive Party, so we initially had a great conversation.
However, halfway through the chat, Herschensohn suddenly asked Lee about his Taiwanese independence strategy, which stupefied Lee.
As Herschensohn pressed, Lee ended up giving him the silent treatment and turned to me, talking for five to six minutes in Mandarin about his philosophy of life, which derived from the passage: “I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me” in the New Testament’s Epistle to the Galatians.
Embarrassed, I had no choice but to listen to his lecture.
As Lee was a former president whom I highly respect, I was unwilling to interrupt him no matter how impolite he was to his other guest. It was really quite embarrassing.
When I discussed the incident with Herschensohn afterward, we had no idea whether Lee had changed his stance on Taiwanese independence or whether everyone had misunderstood him, because his Mandarin was not precise enough.
I agree with Lee that Taiwan is already an independent state and that there is no need to declare independence, for fear that it could lead to a war.
The most important task at hand is to resist China and protect Taiwan, and to uphold the “status quo” of Taiwanese sovereignty.
During his time in office, Lee initially upheld cross-strait peace under the Guidelines for National Unification and the “one China” policy.
However, toward the end of his presidency, Lee strongly opposed the “one China” policy, pushed his “special state-to-state” model of cross-strait relations and approved of Taiwan’s normalization as a nation.
Herschensohn, who served as an assistant to former US president Richard Nixon, was witness to the creation of the Shanghai Communique, which shaped the US’ “one China” policy.
Later in his career, Herschensohn took a strong stance against the policy and even advocated Taiwanese independence.
As the strongest opponent to the so-called “1992 consensus” and the “one China” consensus among Taiwan’s diplomats, I often fought Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government officials and a conservative bureaucracy rife with “one China” sentiment.
When I accompanied Herschensohn on his visit to Lee, who had constantly fought with the KMT, I expected these two “pro-Taiwan” figures to get along like a house on fire, but there was not to be an exchange of views on Taiwanese independence.
History is indeed full of interesting ironies.
The meeting also showed the difficulty of pushing for Taiwanese independence.
My take is that as Lee had been promoting Taiwan’s normalization as a state since leaving office, he was in favor of drafting a new constitution and rectifying the nation’s name, but because he knew that the US is opposed to changing Taiwan’s national title, he thought that a low-profile approach was necessary while waiting for the right moment.
Perhaps that was why Lee was so displeased with having a foreign guest asking him about his Taiwan independence strategy.
Michael Lin is a retired diplomat who served in the US.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US