As usual in a slump, global policymakers have relied on the spending measures associated with John Maynard Keynes to steer their economies through the COVID-19 crisis. Perhaps none has done so with more reluctance than Brazilian Minister of Economic Affairs Paulo Guedes.
As a University of Chicago-trained economist from the school of hard money, Guedes became a market darling by promising to restore discipline to Brazil’s public finances.
He is about to run up the country’s biggest-ever budget deficit instead, but is itching to get back to plan A, even though the IMF has warned the world against a hasty withdrawal of fiscal support.
The whole episode reads like proof of the quip made by another Chicago economist, Nobel laureate Robert Lucas, after the 2008 financial crisis: “Everyone’s a Keynesian in a foxhole.”
That is galling for Guedes. He is an advocate for privatization and tight budgets — and a disciple of free-market guru Milton Friedman, often seen as the polar opposite of Keynes in the economics world.
Guedes was hired by far-right Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro with a mandate to reverse years of growth in public outlays under left-leaning governments.
Brazil’s budget gap soared above 10 percent of GDP midway through last decade, as the economy plunged into a deep recession. The fiscal disarray cost the country its investment-grade credit rating, but this year’s deficit will likely be bigger.
Guedes’ ministry predicts 11.5 percent of GDP and economists forecast an even higher number. Like their peers all over the world, Brazil’s policyicy mmakers have had to funnel financial support to households, companies and local authorities to cushion the impact of the pandemic.
Latin America’s biggest economy will likely shrink more than 9 percent this year, according to the IMF.
“I don’t think Guedes became a Keynesian, but he’s had to surrender to reality,” says Julia Braga, an economics professor at Federal Fluminense University and director of the Brazilian Keynesian Association.
“Brazil’s economy was already very weak. There’s huge slack in the labor market. And no money manager is going to invest where there is no demand,” Braga says.
Brazil has the world’s second-biggest COVID-19 caseload after the US, and Bolsonaro’s government gets blamed for not taking the outbreak seriously enough.
Guedes in March boasted that he could annihilate the virus merely by allocating an extra 5 billion reais (US$930 million) to the Brazilian Ministry of Health. Four months and more than 500 billion reais in public spending later, he has changed his tune.
The former professor has also been sparring with critics who have drawn attention to his change of course. Guedes, whose press office declined to comment for this story, says his willingness to draw on traditions of economics outside the one he is associated with is evidence of a flexible and pragmatic approach.
“Keynes himself said that the economy is like a toolbox, you attack your problem with the right tools,” Guedes told CNN Brasil this month. “If your problem is mass unemployment, you have to attack the problem head on.”
On another occasion, Guedes told lawmakers that he is deeply familiar with the work of the Keynesian school: “I have a whole history of reading these economists in their original languages. It was very easy for me to make a U-turn.”
In fact, Guedes has been pushed into more fiscal easing than he had bargained for.
Brazil’s signature measure in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic has been a monthly payment to workers in the informal economy. The stipend was initially set at 200 reais, but the Brazilian Congress increased it to 500 reais — and then, to avoid a political defeat and take credit for what turned out to be a popular program, Bolsonaro ordered Guedes to make it 600 reais.
Guedes was also reluctant to give financial aid to states and municipalities without some belt-tightening measures in exchange.
However, he lost a series of battles with Congress and governors, and the transfer of funds has now reached almost 170 billion reais.
A key concern about the deficit-spending associated with Keynesian policy, especially in emerging economies like Brazil, where there is always a risk of scaring off foreign investors, is that it will send prices spiraling out of control. That is far from an academic question in Brazil, which had hyperinflation as recently as the 1990s.
For now, markets do not seem too spooked. The currency took a beating in the first months of the pandemic, forcing the central bank to intervene, but has steadied in the past few weeks. One reason might be that much of the world is following a similar playbook. Big-budget relief efforts have been undertaken by governments of various ideological stamps — with backing from the IMF, historically an advocate of tight fiscal policy.
Last month IMF managing director Kristalina Georgieva urged countries to spend what they can and be careful about withdrawing support too quickly.
Guedes, though, has made it clear that he cannot wait to put Keynes back on the shelf.
While there will be a large deficit this year, “all of that will be reversed next year. On Dec. 31, the carriage turns into a pumpkin,” he told CNN.
After delivering a much-anticipated overhaul of Brazil’s bloated pension system last year, his first year in office, Guedes had pledged to move on to the sale of state companies like power utility Eletrobras. He plans to replace Bolsa Familia, the social-aid program created under left-wing former Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, and shift jobs into the formal economy by reducing costs for employers.
It is just not clear if COVID-19 — or his boss — will permit a return to that agenda anytime soon.
Bolsonaro, surrounded by advisers who favor public investment as a way to boost growth, has been happy to extend pandemic-era stimulus measures and shown little enthusiasm for an austerity drive.
Braga says there has been a change of mood. After a few years in the wilderness, Keynesians who support public spending are back in the national conversation.
Before the pandemic, “we were just talking among ourselves. Now the debate can happen,” Braga says.
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused