On June 22, the Taiwan Public Opinion Foundation released the results of its latest poll on political party approval ratings, which showed that support for the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was 28.2 percent, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) support was 16.2 percent, and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and New Power Party (NPP) had 10.7 and 10.6 percent support, respectively.
Surprisingly, the KMT received no support from people aged 20 to 24, while support from that group for the DPP, TPP and NPP was 31.4, 19.7 and 18.3 percent, respectively.
On the same day, the National Policy Foundation, a KMT think tank, released the results of its latest poll on political party approval ratings, showing that 32.9 percent of respondents said they support the DPP, 13.7 percent support the KMT, and 6.6 and 5.9 percent support the TPP and NPP, respectively.
A cross-analysis of the polls shows that 37 percent of people aged 20 to 29 support the DPP, while support for the KMT among the same group is a mere 6.3 percent.
The results of the polls bring to mind a comment by Taipei City Councilor Chen Ping-fu (陳炳甫), who also serves as a KMT Central Standing Committee member. In an interview with the China Review News Agency, Chen said that young people do not support the KMT because of amendments to the curriculum guidelines made during Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) presidency, which resulted in senior-high school students receiving a more Taiwan-focused education.
Those students are now in their mid-30s, and they have no positive feelings toward the KMT. Chen Ping-fu even speculated that the party’s support among those around the age of 20 could be less than 3 percent.
“Taiwan awareness” has grown gradually since 1996, when the nation drew a clear line between itself and the authoritarian Chinese Communist Party regime, and held its first direct presidential election. The focus on Taiwan awareness in schools, beginning during Chen Shui-bian’s presidency, has improved students’ independent thinking and self-awareness.
The 2013 protests against the Cross-Strait Service Trade Agreement with China, the Sunflower movement in 2014 and opposition to the old curriculum guidelines are concrete examples of students’ concerns about their future.
Since Johnny Chiang (江啟臣) in March took over the KMT chairmanship, he has worked hard to boost the KMT’s morale without much success. Apart from ascribing a functional and transitional role to the so-called “1992 consensus,” he has failed to propose a powerful and convincing discourse, and the party finds itself in a difficult situation, not knowing what to do next.
As Chen Ping-fu bluntly pointed out, the “1992 consensus” has fulfilled its transitional mission, and the latest election results have proven that most Taiwanese do not recognize the term, so it is time for the KMT to review its cross-strait policy.
A new discourse to replace the “1992 consensus” should not be based on Chiang’s personal opinion alone. The KMT should draw on wisdom from within and outside the party to come up with a core value that can be recognized by the public at large. It should then write it into its party platform to highlight the visionary significance of such a value.
At a time when the KMT’s pro-China stance might raise public doubt, it would make things worse if it failed to clarify its position to dispel those doubts.
Chang Huey-por is a former president of National Changhua University of Education.
Translated by Eddy Chang
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
The recent aerial clash between Pakistan and India offers a glimpse of how China is narrowing the gap in military airpower with the US. It is a warning not just for Washington, but for Taipei, too. Claims from both sides remain contested, but a broader picture is emerging among experts who track China’s air force and fighter jet development: Beijing’s defense systems are growing increasingly credible. Pakistan said its deployment of Chinese-manufactured J-10C fighters downed multiple Indian aircraft, although New Delhi denies this. There are caveats: Even if Islamabad’s claims are accurate, Beijing’s equipment does not offer a direct comparison
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
Taiwan aims to elevate its strategic position in supply chains by becoming an artificial intelligence (AI) hub for Nvidia Corp, providing everything from advanced chips and components to servers, in an attempt to edge out its closest rival in the region, South Korea. Taiwan’s importance in the AI ecosystem was clearly reflected in three major announcements Nvidia made during this year’s Computex trade show in Taipei. First, the US company’s number of partners in Taiwan would surge to 122 this year, from 34 last year, according to a slide shown during CEO Jensen Huang’s (黃仁勳) keynote speech on Monday last week.
RSS