On Monday, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) spoke during the opening ceremony of this year’s World Health Assembly (WHA). For the first time in the assembly’s history, attendees, including Xi, had to dial in virtually.
Xi made no acknowledgement of the Chinese government’s role in causing the COVID-19 pandemic, nor was there any meaningful apology. Instead, he painted China as a benign force for good and a friend to all nations. Except Taiwan, of course.
The address was a reheated version of the speech Xi gave at the 2017 World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. Xi again attempted to step into the US’ shoes and assume the mantle of world statesman, guardian of globalization and protector of the post-World War II international order.
Xi claimed that COVID-19 had caught the world “by surprise,” despite many scientists warning for years of the threat posed by bat coronaviruses, lax procedures at China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology and unsanitary conditions at wet markets in China.
He also omitted that his government used the WHO to suppress evidence of human-to-human transmission and attempted to browbeat countries that announced temporary suspensions of flights from China by leveling accusations of racism.
If China had been more transparent at the outset, there would have been no nasty “surprise.”
Xi attempted to dodge culpability for the virus’ spread by framing the debate in terms of high-minded internationalism versus narrow nationalism, saying: “The virus does not respect borders. Nor is race or nationality relevant in the face of the disease.”
Xi turned the dial on his lie-o-meter up to 10, saying: “All along, we have acted with openness, transparency and responsibility. We have provided information to the WHO and relevant countries in a most timely fashion. We have released the genome sequence at the earliest possible time. We have shared control and treatment experience with the world without reservation.”
Xi pledged US$2 billion over two years to assist with the global COVID-19 response, with the majority going to developing nations. Of course, US$2 billion spread across many countries is peanuts compared with the damage the pandemic has done to the global economy.
However, it was a clear dig at the US after Washington suspended its WHO funding. Do not worry, world, China will step into the breach and provide responsible leadership during this time of crisis. Move over, America.
Xi, notably, mentioned Africa 10 times, while the US was not mentioned once. This was perhaps the key takeaway from the speech: Xi is using Washington’s spat with the WHO to airbrush the US out of global politics, position China as Africa’s best friend and further cement his Belt and Road Initiative. Expect more money to be pledged to African states.
The Belt and Road Initiative is designed to secure China’s long-term energy and food supplies, open up new trading markets and secure strategic military bases and ports. Its supporters in Asia, Africa and Europe view Chinese investment as a vital source of finance for infrastructure projects and economic growth.
Its detractors warn of hidden dangers: “debt-trap diplomacy,” corruption, “roads to nowhere” and a funding model that requires loans from Beijing to pay Chinese contractors: China gets paid twice.
Xi’s WHA speech was pure Pravda: A typically bold and brazen attempt to spin China’s narrative.
However, few will be taken in. Taiwan, the US and like-minded democracies must take the threat posed by the Belt and Road Initiative seriously and urgently develop a viable alternative, or face being locked out of many markets.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs