There is a serious education gap between Taiwan’s urban and rural areas. Take for example the Comprehensive Assessment Program for Junior High School Students: About 30 percent of all Taiwanese students receive a “C” — which is not a passing grade — in English and mathematics in this annual joint entrance examination. However, the figure is much higher than those in rural schools.
In one school in a remote area, 82 percent of the students received a “C” in English and 92 percent a “C” in math.
Students with poor academic performance are at a disadvantage. Many of them come from disadvantaged families, and they remain disadvantaged when they grow up. If junior-high school students stop their studies after graduating, it would be difficult for them to find decent jobs, and the economic pressure they face could easily lead them to gangs.
Even if poor-performing students choose to continue their studies, it could be difficult for them to catch up. Due to Taiwan’s large number of universities, schools with a student shortage admit first-year students who lag behind academically, giving university professors a headache.
For instance, if English professors find that a student majoring in English lacks basic grammar knowledge, should they waste their time teaching basic grammar in university courses?
Although the nation’s elite are not expected to pay attention to this education gap, the Ministry of Education should.
As the government repeatedly emphasizes the importance of “big data,” the ministry must have seen this gap in its data, but it has unfortunately failed to address the problem.
If the ministry is to improve rural students’ performance, it should at least ensure that every elementary school in rural areas has enough English teachers.
At the moment, many such elementary schools are sharing English teachers with one another, and most of these teachers are substitutes, not full-time teachers.
Although the recruitment of teachers is decided by local education bureaus, the ministry must take responsibility as well.
Rural children are not less intelligent than urban children, but the education they receive is quite different than that of students from high-income households because of a variety of economic factors.
If rural children encounter difficulties in English or math, their parents are often unable to help. Urban children, on the other hand, can often seek guidance from tutors and can afford to go to cram schools. These are areas where rural children are losing out.
The Boyo Social Welfare Foundation said that its research shows that children in rural areas are also able to perform well in school. Most importantly, there should be precise curriculum guidelines for them.
Take the subject of English as an example: The ministry should demand that all elementary-school students be able to write simple, grammatically correct sentences before graduation.
They do not necessarily need to learn present perfect tense in this phase, but they should at least know how to write correct interrogative sentences and negative sentences.
Hopefully, the government understands that most rural elementary-school students are unable to do this when they graduate.
Rural children are also Taiwanese, and there is no reason the government should ignore them. They have the right to high-quality education, and the government is responsible for providing it for them.
Lee Chia-tung is an honorary professor at National Tsing Hua University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
The recent aerial clash between Pakistan and India offers a glimpse of how China is narrowing the gap in military airpower with the US. It is a warning not just for Washington, but for Taipei, too. Claims from both sides remain contested, but a broader picture is emerging among experts who track China’s air force and fighter jet development: Beijing’s defense systems are growing increasingly credible. Pakistan said its deployment of Chinese-manufactured J-10C fighters downed multiple Indian aircraft, although New Delhi denies this. There are caveats: Even if Islamabad’s claims are accurate, Beijing’s equipment does not offer a direct comparison
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo (顧立雄) has said that the armed forces must reach a high level of combat readiness by 2027. That date was not simply picked out of a hat. It has been bandied around since 2021, and was mentioned most recently by US Senator John Cornyn during a question to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio at a US Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on Tuesday. It first surfaced during a hearing in the US in 2021, when then-US Navy admiral Philip Davidson, who was head of the US Indo-Pacific Command, said: “The threat [of military
RSS