The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairperson by-election took place yesterday. Only about 9,000 — less than 3 percent — of the more than 300,000 party members who were eligible to vote are younger than 40. Thus, a lack of next-generation candidates has become the KMT’s biggest crisis.
However, this alienation from the youth was not created in a day.
During my term as head of the Taichung Department of Social Affairs, Taiwan was affected by the financial crisis, and this had negative effects on a number of households. In early 2009, a resident wrote a letter to then-Taichung mayor Jason Hu (胡志強), asking him to open a “food bank” to help families in need, but department staff knew little about how to run a food bank.
Fortunately, a man surnamed Ma (馬), a social worker who worked with homeless people, introduced the department to a man surnamed Hsu (徐), who was the head of a group that operated a food bank in a remote area.
After Hsu demonstrated food distribution in Taichung, the city quickly set up a food bank, pantry and eight distribution stations. This was the original model for food banks that can be seen in every city and county nationwide today.
When Junior Chamber International Taiwan (JCI Taiwan) selected Ten Outstanding Young Persons in 2011, I recommended Ma for the prestigious annual award because of the practicality of the food bank.
This allowed me to witness the non-governmental organization’s strict selection system.
After Ma passed the document review in the first round, JCI Taiwan staff visited his colleagues as part of the second round to verify the authenticity of the documentation — a very careful process. Unfortunately, none of the candidates from the social welfare category were selected that year.
Lin Yi-ying (林依瑩), who won the Ten Outstanding Young Persons award in 2010, was also recommended by the Taichung City Government.
Lin, who was chief executive officer of the Hondao Senior Citizen’s Welfare Foundation, received the award for launching the 2007 “Go Grandriders” campaign. By thinking out of the box, she brought a new look to senior citizen welfare.
I was impressed by the selection mechanism for the Ten Outstanding Young Persons, so before the 2016 presidential and legislative elections, I suggested to a friend working at the KMT that they invite winners of the Ten Outstanding Young Persons, Ten Outstanding Young Women and Ten Outstanding Young Farmers to be placed on the party’s legislator-at-large nominee list.
However, my friend said that party heavyweights had already recommended between 200 and 300 names, adding that there would be no room for outsiders, as not even all insiders could get on the list.
The answer stunned me.
For example, Lin was listed as a legislator-at-large nominee by the New Power Party in 2016, and she was appointed Taichung deputy mayor by then-Taichung mayor Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) later that year.
Since Lin Chia-lung lost his re-election bid two years later, Lin Yi-ying has been providing services to Aboriginal communities, and her accomplishments are impressive.
The intention is not to emphasize that there are more “heroes” among the young. However, inviting the Ten Outstanding Young Persons, women and farmers selected by JCI Taiwan, and members of the Ten Outstanding Young Women Association and the Taiwan District of Kiwanis International is much better than picking legislator-at-large nominees based on the KMT leadership’s personal preferences.
Most of the young people selected have no political affiliations, and many are not even interested in politics. Those who are willing to enter politics only want a platform and an opportunity to participate in society.
As the KMT pushes them away, some of them might be recruited by other parties. No wonder the gap between the KMT and the young generation keeps widening.
Only by constantly recruiting new talent can a political party renew itself. A party should take the initiative, so that new blood continues to fill its ranks.
Chang Kuo-hui is a former director of the Taichung Department of Social Affairs.
Translated by Eddy Chang
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s