WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus on Feb. 10 tweeted that he had “just been at the airport seeing off members of an advance team for the @WHO-led #2019nCoV international expert mission to #China.”
Reuters reported a day earlier that it had taken nearly two weeks for the director-general to get the Chinese government’s green light regarding the team’s composition, after meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing on Jan. 28.
In a news report published by Voice of America’s Chinese-language service on Feb. 11, a US academic revealed on condition of anonymity that the team sent out by the WHO is composed mainly of personnel from the organization’s headquarters in Geneva rather than medical experts.
In an online daily briefing on Feb. 3, Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokeswoman Hua Chunying (華春瑩) told reporters: “Since Jan. 3, we have notified the US of the epidemic and our control measures altogether 30 times.”
It seems China reports to the US almost on a daily basis, but the New York Times on Feb. 7 reported that the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has been offering to send a team of experts to China to help for more than a month without even receiving a response from Beijing.
On Feb. 8, before China consented to the WHO dispatching a team of experts, Radio France Internationale reported that Beijing had sent Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Lieutenant General Chen Wei (陳薇), a researcher at the PLA’s Academy of Military Medical Sciences, to take over the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s BSL-4 lab.
The lab was set up in collaboration with French engineers. Following the PLA’s takeover, the lab is now classified as a military secret and offers no access to foreign experts. Even if they were given access, they would hardly find anything significant, as Chinese military experts have been stationed at the lab for two weeks.
The state-run Pengbai news outlet said that Chen was sent to the lab as early as Jan. 26.
As the lab is a mere 32km from the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market, thought to be a possible origin of the COVID-19 outbreak, many have their eyes on the lab.
Chinese virologist Shi Zhengli (石正麗), who in 2017 won first prize at the Natural Science Awards of Hubei Province for a research project on crucial viruses carried by bats in China, is a researcher at the lab.
Perhaps it is no coincidence that some have expressed suspicion that the coronavirus was created through genetic modification. After all, biological warfare is one link in the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “unrestricted warfare” concept.
On Jan. 28, Tedros said that the WHO “is confident in China’s epidemic prevention and control ability,” and wanted the world to believe him.
A few days later, while declaring the virus a public health emergency of international concern, he criticized countries that have imposed restrictions on travel and trade with China.
This attitude led to a relaxation of prevention efforts across the globe and caused the epidemic to spread further. For instance, a few international cruise ships continued operating, but are now being rejected from ports.
All of a sudden, Tedros changed his tune.
“The detection of a small number of cases may indicate more widespread transmission in other countries; in short, we may only be seeing the tip of the iceberg,” he said on Feb. 10.
Tedros’ change of attitude might have something to do with his calling on the world to donate funds to China.
At a news conference in Geneva on Feb. 5, Tedros said that the WHO is “launching a strategic preparedness plan to support countries to detect and respond to cases” and “requesting US$675 million to fund the plan for the next three months.”
The Chinese government is filled with corrupt officials, and after Beijing turned down US expert assistance, rumors that the Red Cross Society of China resold donated supplies emerged on the Chinese microblogging Web site Sina Weibo, prompting the World Bank to announce that it had no plans to provide financial assistance to China.
As World Bank president David Malpass told Reuters on Feb. 10: “China has its own large international reserves.”
Indeed, China’s foreign-exchange reserves stood at US$3.115 trillion as of January.
In the past, the Chinese Ministry of Health — now dissolved and integrated into the Chinese National Health Commission — spent half its annual expenditure on the Bureau of Healthcare, which is responsible for taking care of high-level central government officials.
It is solid proof that China is completely capable of taking up the financial burden of public health — it is only a matter of whether Xi is willing.
While the US-based pharmaceutical company Gilead Sciences Inc is providing a new antiviral drug to help China combat the disease, the medicine is very likely to be reserved for high-level officials.
One cannot help but wonder if Tedros, who has been fawning over Beijing, or his country, Ethiopia, are financially involved with the CCP. China is highly skilled in bribing foreign officials, particularly those who serve in the UN.
Former Hong Kong secretary for home affairs Patrick Ho (何志平), the trusted aide of the territory’s first chief executive, Tung Chee-hwa (董建華), was sentenced to three years in prison by a US federal court in New York on charges of trying to bribe two African government leaders.
It is outrageous that Xi and Tedros should ask other countries for financial assistance before the victims of the COVID-19 outbreak have had the chance to seek compensation from them.
Paul Lin is a senior political commentator.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS