On Feb. 7, Singapore’s government raised the city-state’s Disease Outbreak Response System Condition (DORSCON) level from “yellow” to “orange.”
As COVID-19 spreads through the Singaporean populace, the government has heightened measures according to the raised DORSCON level.
This new alert level indicates that the coronavirus is severe and is easily spread from person to person — although it is not prevalent among the population and is “being contained.”
While the government has made plenty of announcements with the expected reassuring platitudes, Singaporean Minister of Health Gan Kim Yong (顏金勇) on Wednesday last week said that “we have to be prepared for the worst.”
This came after a news release announcing three new cases, bringing the total number of cases to 50; Singapore has the highest number of any country after China. [Editor’s note: As of press time last night it had 81 cases.]
However, when the alert level was first raised, Singaporeans responded by flocking to the supermarkets, emptying the shelves of toilet paper, rice, canned foods and other staples.
Store inventories were strained, although over the past week the situation has eased.
What is to be said about how Singaporeans reacted?
The Singaporeans’ response highlights some ways that people think that are concerning. People only react when the government gives an indication that the situation could worsen, but in a manner that is clearly beyond necessary.
Even prior to the increase in the DORSCON level, some Singaporeans were hoarding masks and reselling them at extravagant prices, at a time when pharmacies and retailers had shortages.
Singaporean Minister for Trade and Industry Chan Chun Sing (陳振聲) shared his dismay, saying “such behavior — they are not appropriate ... they are selfish and they are not helpful to our collective defense.”
Chan’s statement was telling. Singapore’s response to any external threat, visible and, as in the current case, invisible, has been to consolidate security and induce rhetoric of collective defense.
However, while the government preaches this, Singaporeans continue on their own path of self-preservation.
It is not that Singaporeans are selfish, it is that they recognize that their only way to true self-protection and survival does not rely on their leaders.
The empty shelves at supermarkets, the hoarding of masks and the long lines for hand sanitizer are simply symptoms of waning trust that people have in the government.
However, the government has taken the right measures to isolate potential cases and conduct extensive tracking of those the patients might have been in contact with.
Singapore’s small geographic size definitely helps on this front.
When the virus was only beginning to raise alarm bells, the government announced that it would distribute masks to households (four per family).
However, for many Singaporeans, these methods of responding to this invisible enemy are not enough.
Many wonder why the border with a high-risk country like China was not closed much earlier; why, unlike Hong Kongers, Singaporean workers still had to go to the office.
Interestingly, when a DBS bank employee was discovered to have contracted the virus, the whole floor of the office building was evacuated.
Many Singaporeans also wonder why the city-state’s airshow was not postponed.
The litany of concerns is extensive — what is revealed by the government’s slow response is a reluctance to make difficult, but necessary decisions that would have a significant financial impact.
Financial growth has brought Singapore success, but when it becomes the only thing that the city-state is aiming for, nothing is allowed to block people from grasping it.
Pursuit of this warped self-interest has trickled down into Singaporeans’ psyche — and resulted in the apocalyptic scenes in supermarkets and the reselling of masks that would make former Turing Pharmaceuticals CEO Martin Shkreli look like an amateur.
The situation gives an opportunity to the Singaporean government to rebuild trust with the public. This calls for greater transparency and frankness.
It is time to leave behind empty words of reassurance, but authorities should not peddle extreme fear.
It is time for the government to recognize that Singaporeans, despite their criticisms, will need to rely on those in power — for who else is there to turn to?
Singaporeans look at how other Asian countries have dealt with the virus: The Philippines has barred Chinese citizens, Taiwan has restricted travel from China, and so has Vietnam.
A casual analysis reveals that, at this time, countries are closing themselves off, but also need to be opening up communication and cooperation — the latter is true, but the former is necessary.
At a time like this, when people do not fully understand the virus itself, they need to do what is necessary to protect their own nation and their own people.
Nigel Li is a student at the Moscow State Institute of International Relations.
US President Donald Trump on Thursday issued executive orders barring Americans from conducting business with WeChat owner Tencent Holdings and ByteDance, the Beijing-based owner of popular video-sharing app TikTok. The orders are to take effect 45 days after they were signed, which is Sept. 20. The orders accuse WeChat of helping the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) review and remove content that it considers to be politically sensitive, and of using fabricated news to benefit itself. The White House has accused TikTok of collecting users’ information, location data and browsing histories, which could be used by the Chinese government, and pose
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) at a ceremony on July 30 officially commissioned China’s BeiDou-3 satellite navigation system. The constellation of satellites, which is now fully operational, was completed six months ahead of schedule. Its deployment means that the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is now in possession of an autonomous, global satellite navigation system to rival the US’ GPS, Russia’s Glonass and the EU’s Galileo. Although Chinese officials have repeatedly sought to reassure the world that BeiDou-3 is primarily a civilian and commercial platform, US and European military experts beg to differ. Teresa Hitchens, a senior research associate at the University of
There are few areas where Beijing, Taipei, and Washington find themselves in agreement these days, but one of them is that the situation in the Taiwan Strait is growing more dangerous. Such a shared assessment quickly breaks down, though, when the question turns to identifying sources of rising tensions. Several Chinese experts and officials I have consulted with recently have argued that Beijing’s increasingly belligerent behavior in the Taiwan Strait is driven mostly by fear. According to this narrative, Beijing is worried that unless it puts a brake on Taiwan’s move away from the mainland, Taiwan could be “lost” forever. They
Former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝), who died on Thursday last week, coined the phrase “new Taiwanese” and used it in some of his public speeches. The concept of “new Taiwanese” was an important link in the chain of his political thought. Lee proposed the term in August 1998 on the eve of the anniversary of the end of the Pacific War. His intention was to consolidate a common understanding around the idea of “new Taiwanese,” and to embody the Taiwanese spirit of never giving up and not fearing hardship, and to create bright prospects for generations to come. However, after