To those who follow international affairs, it is clear that China has become increasingly repressive under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平).
Over the past eight years, electronic surveillance in China has become more pervasive, intolerance for freedom of expression has grown and many lawyers have been disbarred or imprisoned simply for defending their clients’ rights.
Moreover, Xi has eliminated the two-term limit on the presidency, withdrawn protections for civil liberties in Hong Kong and overseen the detention and forcible re-education of hundreds of thousands of Uighurs and other Muslim minorities in Xinjiang.
Much of this has been reported by the world’s media. What is less well-known is that China is using its immense economic power and international clout to undermine human rights protections at the global level, too.
China has long relied on its economic strength to head off international condemnation of its human rights record. As so many countries fear antagonizing China, they have refused to sign on to resolutions criticizing it at the UN Human Rights Council.
Likewise, after sentencing dissident writer Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波) to 11 years in prison in 2009 (for the offense of collecting signatures on a petition for rights), the Chinese government grew worried that Liu would be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, so it threatened Norway, the home of the prize, with economic reprisals.
However, in this case China’s efforts failed: Liu received the prize in 2010. Having carefully managed its income from the sale of North Sea oil, Norway has the world’s largest sovereign wealth fund and is not particularly susceptible to economic strong-arming.
Yet, more important, Norway does not do much business with China, leaving it well-positioned to withstand the pressure campaign (which largely involved purchases of Norwegian salmon).
BLANKET OPPOSITION
Nonetheless, Human Rights Watch’s World Report 2020 said that China has since stepped up its efforts and is no longer content merely to avert criticism of its own human rights record.
“At the UN Human Rights Council, China routinely opposes virtually every human rights initiative that criticizes a particular country unless it is watered down enough to secure that government’s consent,” Human Rights Watch executive director Kenneth Roth said in the report.
In this way, China has managed to bring many other governments over to its side.
“In recent years, China has opposed resolutions condemning human rights violations in Myanmar, Syria, Iran, the Philippines, Burundi, Venezuela, Nicaragua, Yemen, Eritrea and Belarus,” Roth said.
For example, in the case of Myanmar, “Beijing has been clear that it will not tolerate pressure on Myanmar, despite a UN fact-finding mission’s conclusion that Myanmar’s top military leaders should be investigated and prosecuted for genocide” against the country’s Rohingya minority, he said.
Perversely, although Islamophobia has been a key factor in the persecution of the Rohingya, China’s broader stand on human rights has also helped many predominantly Muslim countries avoid censure for their own abuses.
Making matters worse, China’s ability to silence other governments extends even to those that have positioned themselves as champions of human rights, Roth said.
“French President Emmanuel Macron visited China in November 2019, but made no public mention of human rights,” Roth said. “Visiting leaders have typically excused such public silence by insisting that they raise human rights with Chinese officials in private discussions, but little if any evidence exists that this behind-the-scenes approach does any good.”
GLASS HOUSES
The case of the US is somewhat more complicated.
In October last year, US President Donald Trump’s administration, to its credit, imposed sanctions on the Xinjiang Public Security Bureau for its alleged abuses against Uighurs and on several Chinese technology companies for their involvement in human rights violations. Some administration officials have also openly denounced Chinese human rights practices.
The problem is that the administration’s own dismal human rights record — from a travel ban targeting Muslims to the separation and caging of migrant families at the border — has significantly undermined its credibility. Trump can scarcely condemn China for its human rights record when he publicly praises strongmen and dictators, from North Korean leader Kim Jong-un to Russian President Vladimir Putin and Xi.
Meanwhile, China has extended its assault beyond governments to target private institutions, too.
For example, it last year suspended a lucrative broadcast agreement with the US’ National Basketball Association in retaliation for one team manager’s tweets in support of protesters in Hong Kong. China has also threatened to bar tuition-paying Chinese students from attending Western universities that sponsor programs critical of Chinese rights breaches.
Given that Xi has made it even more dangerous for Chinese citizens to express concerns about human rights, it is all the more important that external voices not be silenced. All those who care about human rights must stand up to China’s expanding pressure campaign.
To that end, the report offers a set of recommendations for confronting China’s challenge to the international human rights system — most involve greater forthrightness and outspokenness.
Public exposure, after all, is almost always the best way to counter gross infringement of human rights. The worst abuses of the 20th century — including the Armenian genocide, Joseph Stalin’s gulags, the Nazi death camps, Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Great Leap Forward and the Cambodian killing fields — were largely hidden from the world until after the fact.
Exposing and denouncing them while they were under way would have been the best means of mitigating the horrors. The same is true of China’s abuses today.
Aryeh Neier, president emeritus of the Open Society Foundations and a founder of Human Rights Watch, is author of The International Human Rights Movement: A History.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Keelung Mayor George Hsieh (謝國樑) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Tuesday last week apologized over allegations that the former director of the city’s Civil Affairs Department had illegally accessed citizens’ data to assist the KMT in its campaign to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) councilors. Given the public discontent with opposition lawmakers’ disruptive behavior in the legislature, passage of unconstitutional legislation and slashing of the central government’s budget, civic groups have launched a massive campaign to recall KMT lawmakers. The KMT has tried to fight back by initiating campaigns to recall DPP lawmakers, but the petition documents they