We all hope to improve the quality of life for Taiwanese. To do so, it is worth looking toward how many small European countries are able to have a high standard of living, despite having limited land and small populations.
These countries do not enjoy massive domestic markets, and cannot rely on their agricultural industries alone. One of their shared characteristics is that they all have highly developed precision machinery industries.
“Precision machinery industry” refers to high-quality industrial products. Thanks to these goods, the whole world is a market for these countries, and the high added value of such commodities has made them wealthy.
Take communication products as an example: Sweden and Finland have small populations, but they are good at manufacturing advanced communications equipment.
Machine tools are another example. Many high-precision machine tools are produced in Switzerland. Despite its small area and population, its high-quality offerings make Swiss machine tools a necessity.
No wonder these countries have been able to sell their industrial products at high prices overseas.
Look at some precision industry products. A wire-cutting machine is used for precision cutting, and the cutter is equipped with extremely thin threads. Today, the radius of the world’s thinnest steel thread is only 0.01mm, which is beyond imagination without this specialized equipment. The measurement precision of some companies is even as high as 0.1 nanometers.
Government leaders need to increase public interest in the precision machinery industry.
If the government wants Taiwanese-developed precision machinery and measurement equipment to be featured at European exhibitions where they could be admired, then leaders must first gain an understanding of the industry, as well as its importance to the economy.
Taiwan’s industrial products must become more precise, because the quality of Chinese industrial products has surged, and other Southeast Asian countries have also shown a desire for industrial development. If Taiwan cannot take its own precision machinery industry to a higher level, it will be difficult to improve the economy.
Hopefully, the government also understands that Taiwanese industry is already making progress.
For example, Taiwanese companies are able to measure extremely low electrical currents, and produce nanopowder that does not lump. This technology is developed by Taiwanese, which shows that the nation already has a group of outstanding engineers and entrepreneurs with the patience and vision needed to engage in long-term research and development.
However, there is still room for improvement. For example, commentators on TV talk shows never discuss how the country should develop this industry.
One important point is that the industry is based on extensive knowledge and advanced technology. To continue training outstanding engineers who are not only knowledgeable but also skillful in these technologies, the government must push for more public interest in the industry.
What is most worrying is perhaps the public’s general lack of interest in high-tech development.
Developing the precision machinery industry is not an easy task. How to encourage Taiwanese to build this industry is a question that leaders must consider carefully.
Lee Chia-tung is an honorary professor at National Tsing Hua University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Having lived through former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s tumultuous and scandal-ridden administration, the last place I had expected to come face-to-face with “Mr Brexit” was in a hotel ballroom in Taipei. Should I have been so surprised? Over the past few years, Taiwan has unfortunately become the destination of choice for washed-up Western politicians to turn up long after their political careers have ended, making grandiose speeches in exchange for extraordinarily large paychecks far exceeding the annual salary of all but the wealthiest of Taiwan’s business tycoons. Taiwan’s pursuit of bygone politicians with little to no influence in their home
US lobbyist Christian Whiton has published an update to his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” discussed on the editorial page on Sunday. His new article, titled “What Taiwan Should Do” refers to the three articles published in the Taipei Times, saying that none had offered a solution to the problems he identified. That is fair. The articles pushed back on points Whiton made that were felt partisan, misdirected or uninformed; in this response, he offers solutions of his own. While many are on point and he would find no disagreement here, the nuances of the political and historical complexities in
Taiwan has lost Trump. Or so a former State Department official and lobbyist would have us believe. Writing for online outlet Domino Theory in an article titled “How Taiwan lost Trump,” Christian Whiton provides a litany of reasons that the William Lai (賴清德) and Donald Trump administrations have supposedly fallen out — and it’s all Lai’s fault. Although many of Whiton’s claims are misleading or ill-informed, the article is helpfully, if unintentionally, revealing of a key aspect of the MAGA worldview. Whiton complains of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party’s “inability to understand and relate to the New Right in America.” Many
Taiwan faces an image challenge even among its allies, as it must constantly counter falsehoods and misrepresentations spread by its more powerful neighbor, the People’s Republic of China (PRC). While Taiwan refrains from disparaging its troublesome neighbor to other countries, the PRC is working not only to forge a narrative about itself, its intentions and value to the international community, but is also spreading lies about Taiwan. Governments, parliamentary groups and civil societies worldwide are caught in this narrative tug-of-war, each responding in their own way. National governments have the power to push back against what they know to be
RSS