Taiwanese university campuses have recently seen several incidents of aggression by groups of Chinese students. They damaged a “Lennon wall” at Soochow University and attacked Hong Kong students at I-Shou University and Chinese Culture University, where they pulled one student down from a high ledge.
University authorities have responded to these incidents along the following lines: The perpetrators are repremanded, they apologize and the school either urges them not do it again or imposes a painless “demerit.”
If schools stick to this pattern, they will be condoning Chinese students’ aggression and opening the door to even more thuggish behavior.
This is not to say that anyone should try to privately punish or attack Chinese students for their aggression.
It means that Taiwan should use more systematic and organized methods to prevent and respond to such incidents.
For example, the government should thoroughly investigate the forces behind such incidents, sternly penalize physical violence and help victims take legal action.
The places where public forums like “Lennon walls” are set up should be key points for maintaining campus security. If such issues are not made safe, such actions would tend to escalate, leading to deeper confrontation and sharper clashes.
As well as reviewing the way individual cases are handled, if viewed from the individuals who are in charge of the universities involved, the responses chosen by the school authorities would not come as a surprise.
Take for example Soochow, which handled the vandalism of its “Lennon wall” by convening a “mediation committee.” This half-hearted response is less surprising when one considers that Soochow president Pan Wei-ta (潘維大) gave a speech about China’s Belt and Road Initiative at a juridical forum on cross-strait peaceful development, a pro-unification event.
Another factor behind the school authorities’ lenient responses might have to do with their efforts to enroll Chinese students.
If we take the number of Chinese students studying at higher education institutions in Taiwan this academic year, as published by the Ministry of Education, and add the number of foreign students taking formal degree courses, we find that Chinese students make up 62 percent of all non-Taiwanese students at Soochow, 10.6 percent at I-Shou, 48.1 percent at Chinese Culture University and 51 percent at Shih Hsin University.
Except for the relatively low proportion at I-Shou, Chinese students account for the bulk of non-Taiwanese students at the other three schools.
It would be no surprise to find that these schools’ inaction or lenient penalties in response to these incidents stem from their anxiety that punishing those responsible could affect their recruitment of Chinese students.
The government must therefore more closely scrutinize Chinese students’ applications, and, if necessary, reduce the quota of students from China to prevent large numbers of Chinese students invading Taiwan’s universities, ostensibly to study, but in reality to promote unification.
As for the schools, they should follow the example of Canada’s McMaster University, which revoked the status of its Chinese Students and Scholars Association for surveilling Chinese students on behalf of the Beijing government.
China has begun promoting unification within Taiwan’s education sector. If the nation keeps turning a blind eye on the grounds of “keeping politics out of the campus,” it will amount to colluding with China’s pro-unification strategy of eroding Taiwan-centric education and freedom of speech.
Allan Hsiao studies political science at Soochow University.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big