For some, it is about bringing an end to debilitating pain or dark thoughts. For others, it is as simple as being liberated from the sinking realization that you need a tampon — but you left them in your other handbag.
When a new wave of feminist authors and activists are calling on women to embrace their periods, the idea that some do not want a monthly bleed and are seeking to avoid having them altogether can seem radical.
The technology is there, in contraceptives — they do not only prevent pregnancy.
Illustration: Mountain People
A drop in tampon sales has been linked to women using contraceptive methods that stop or lighten their periods. About one-fifth of women using contraceptive implants no longer bleed, while many who take contraceptive pills without a break often achieve the same result — and those are not the only methods.
The impact can be life-changing.
“I started taking the mini-pill purely for the fact it would stop my periods,” said 25-year-old Jaimi Kendall from Exeter, England. “For years, I had extremely heavy periods that would drag on for eight weeks or so and left me severely anemic to the point where I started experiencing pulsatile tinnitus. Not having periods any more is a blessing.”
She is not alone. Catriona Clarke, 25, from Cambridge, England, was thrilled when she realized that she could stop having periods thanks to her contraceptive pills.
“My periods weren’t even that bad, just uncomfortable and a mess. And, given how expensive period products can be, an expensive mess,” she said.
Clearly, removing stigma around a normal bodily function should be celebrated. Proposals to end the tampon tax, distribution of free sanitary products, better education for boys, as well as girls, and the introduction of menstrual leave are all positive moves toward ensuring women are not held back by their periods.
However, seeing them as a fundamental part of the body’s rhythm — something to be endured, or even celebrated each month (the author Maisie Hill writes in her book Period Power of embracing their natural high) — is only one side of the story.
The other is a tale of pain, bloating, bad skin and mood swings. Many women feel trapped in a cycle that can be unpredictable, inconvenient and unpleasant.
Menstruation is the process by which the body sheds the lining of the uterus and unfertilized egg, triggered by fluctuating levels of the hormones estrogen and progesterone. Not having periods does not create a “backlog,” nor are they necessary to “cleanse the body.”
However, menstruation can exacerbate incapacitating physical or mental health problems, including endometriosis and depression. It can also be distressing or problematic for people with gender dysphoria.
In a survey of 7,500 women by Public Health England, half those aged 16 to 64 reported menstrual issues in the past year, rising to 75 percent for those aged 16 to 24.
London-based Homerton University Hospital consultant gynecologist Jane Thomas said that having so many periods is a modern phenomenon: Historically, women would spend much of their time pregnant or breastfeeding (which can delay the return of periods).
“It would be a minority of people who had a couple of children only and menstruated all the way through their lives,” Thomas said.
So, if women do not want a period, is there a medical reason that they should? Many might be surprised to learn that the short answer is: no.
While Thomas noted that regular periods are an indicator of good health, British Royal College of General Practitioners women’s health clinical lead Anne Connolly said that there is no health benefit to them.
“Ninety-nine percent of women don’t need to bleed,” Connolly said.
Judith Stephenson, the Margaret Pyke professor of sexual and reproductive health at University College London, agreed.
“In some ways, it seems like one of God’s great design faults. It is not helpful to have these periods — in fact, if you don’t have them, one of the biggest benefits would be reducing iron deficiency anemia,” Stephenson said.
The option not to have periods is rooted in hormonal contraceptives, which use synthetic versions of estrogen and progesterone to interfere with the menstrual cycle. This prevents pregnancy (meaning the decision to stop bleeding is not compatible with trying to have a baby), sometimes with other effects — including lightening bleeding or stopping it altogether.
Many new forms of contraception — including contraceptive implants and injection, the intrauterine system (the hormonal coil) and the progestogen-only “mini” pill — are designed to be taken continuously, meaning many users can safely go months or years without any bleeding.
The benefits can be myriad, from saving money to mitigating health problems, including polycystic ovary syndrome, in which there is a risk of problematic cells building up in the lining of the womb.
While regular natural periods prevent this buildup, and thus can be beneficial for the condition, so too are hormonal contraceptives (even if they stop periods), because they keep the lining of the womb thin.
The idea that bleeding is necessary has been fueled by decades of advice that women on the combined pill should take a break for one week each month. This results in a withdrawal bleed, or “fake” period (which is why the combined pill is often referred to, somewhat misleadingly, as “regulating” periods).
Some have claimed that this was contrived by the pill’s inventors to make it acceptable to the Catholic Church; others have argued that it was chiefly a practice to reassure women that they were not pregnant and to give them a break from the high doses of hormones.
Experts have said that women today take this seven-day break as a holdover from earlier practice, even as the makeup and dose of the combined pill has changed over time.
When the British Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists’ Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare (FSRH) in January updated its guidelines to make it clear that there were no health benefits to taking the break, many women felt they had been cheated into having a monthly bleed.
Doctors have known for years that the combined pill could be taken without a break, Thomas said, but many women said that they had no idea until they read of the change in guidelines.
For 27-year-old Cinzia DuBois of Edinburgh, the effect was huge. When she was forced to take a gap in her pill, the week before and after her bleed would often leave her feeling suicidal.
“I’ve attempted to kill myself four times, so it’s not a light matter,” she said. “Having to go through this every month was exhausting for both myself and my partner.”
Since she stopped taking a break in her pill, “I haven’t had a single suicidal episode and have found my spells of depression much less frequent than they were and not as extreme,” she added.
For the more than 3 million women who take the combined pill in England, the FSRH announcement made no monthly bleed a possibility.
However, not everyone is comfortable with that idea, or with ditching natural periods.
Holly Grigg-Spall, the author of Sweetening the Pill: Or How We Got Hooked on Hormonal Birth Control, said that while she understands why some women might choose not to bleed, there is limited research on the long-term impact of continuously taking the combined pill.
Telling women they can stop their periods without giving them all the information could reinforce taboos around bleeding, she said.
“It is really just an exaggerated form of saying to women: ‘Keep your periods quiet, hide them, be secret about them, don’t talk about them, don’t show your tampon when you walk to the bathroom, your boyfriend doesn’t want to know about your periods,’” Grigg-Spall said.
Some have also raised concerns that bleeding is a sign that a woman has not conceived.
However, Thomas said that the only way to be sure you are not pregnant is a pregnancy test.
“You can definitely bleed and be pregnant. So having a period or withdrawal bleed from the pill isn’t a guarantee,” she said.
Experts have also said that stopping periods would not affect future fertility.
“When you stop taking the hormones, they get flushed out of your system very quickly and your periods will return to what they were before you started taking the pill,” Connolly said.
However, it is easier to reliably stop bleeding with some contraceptives than with others.
The majority of women taking methods that contain synthetic versions of both estrogen and progesterone can achieve that outcome, but it is less predictable for some methods containing synthetic progesterone only.
Some women experience bleeding that is regular, irregular or prolonged (albeit often light); it differs between methods. About 20 percent of women on contraceptive implants no longer bleed, compared with 68 percent on the injection after two years of use.
Some women might also prefer not to use hormonal contraceptives, as they can bring unwanted side effects such as fluctuations in weight and mood.
Some methods can also slightly raise the risk of certain cancers, including breast cancer (although they reduce the risk of others, including womb cancer).
Thomas agreed that more research is needed into the long-term effects of taking hormonal contraception.
However, she and other experts said that there should be greater awareness of the benefits of contraceptives beyond preventing pregnancy, from tackling acne to alleviating premenstrual symptoms.
Stephenson said that the option of having periods is naturally addressed in consultations about contraception choices, but should be talked about more widely.
“It is absolutely a sensible discussion in its own right,” she said.
Earlier this year, she colaunched ContraceptionChoices.org, a Web site that recommends contraceptive options to women on the basis of what they say matters to them — including whether they want to have periods.
Some do, some do not; each for a variety of reasons, but perhaps the most empowering approach for all women is simple: to let them choose for themselves.
Sophie, 24, from Glasgow, no longer bleeds thanks to a contraceptive implant, saying that it has made a huge difference to her mental health — she could not be happier.
“Just because something is natural, I don’t think it in any way means we should have to go through it,” she said. “Different things suit different people, and that’s fantastic.”
In late January, Taiwan’s first indigenous submarine, the Hai Kun (海鯤, or Narwhal), completed its first submerged dive, reaching a depth of roughly 50m during trials in the waters off Kaohsiung. By March, it had managed a fifth dive, still well short of the deep-water and endurance tests required before the navy could accept the vessel. The original delivery deadline of November last year passed months ago. CSBC Corp, Taiwan, the lead contractor, now targets June and the Ministry of National Defense is levying daily penalties for every day the submarine remains unfinished. The Hai Kun was supposed to be
Reports about Elon Musk planning his own semiconductor fab have sparked anxiety, with some warning that Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) could lose key customers to vertical integration. A closer reading suggests a more measured conclusion: Musk is advancing a strategic vision of in-house chip manufacturing, but remains far from replacing the existing foundry ecosystem. For TSMC, the short-term impact is limited; the medium-term challenge lies in supply diversification and pricing pressure, only in the long term could it evolve into a structural threat. The clearest signal is Musk’s announcement that Tesla and SpaceX plan to develop a fab project dubbed “Terafab”
Most schoolchildren learn that the circumference of the Earth is about 40,000km. They do not learn that the global economy depends on just 160 of those kilometers. Blocking two narrow waterways — the Strait of Hormuz and the Taiwan Strait — could send the economy back in time, if not to the Stone Age that US President Donald Trump has been threatening to bomb Iran back to, then at least to the mid-20th century, before the Rolling Stones first hit the airwaves. Over the past month and a half, Iran has turned the Strait of Hormuz, which is about 39km wide at
The ongoing Middle East crisis has reinforced an uncomfortable truth for Taiwan: In an increasingly interconnected and volatile world, distant wars rarely remain distant. What began as a regional confrontation between the US, Israel and Iran has evolved into a strategic shock wave reverberating far beyond the Persian Gulf. For Taiwan, the consequences are immediate, material and deeply unsettling. From Taipei’s perspective, the conflict has exposed two vulnerabilities — Taiwan’s dependence on imported energy and the risks created when Washington’s military attention is diverted. Together, they offer a preview of the pressures Taiwan might increasingly face in an era of overlapping geopolitical
RSS