Russian President Vladimir Putin never thought he would have a problem with the nation’s youth culture. He has always been so confident of his popularity that he felt no need to repeat the mistakes of his Soviet predecessors, who tried to control the pop-music underground and banned it when they could not, but as the whole nation is losing patience with the system Putin has built, Russian rappers are now flipping off the state.
The Russian hip-hop world had been reeling this year from a wave of cancelations of concerts across the nation of acts that bureaucrats and police deemed to be immoral or otherwise extreme.
The resulting popular backlash, including a well-attended concert in Moscow to protest the detention of a rapper known as Husky and an abortive hearing in parliament, set off alarm bells among Putin’s advisers; Putin himself this week demanded to know why the shows were being shut down. Now he is trying to get a grip on a situation that emerged from the growing alienation of the Russian people from their government.
Illustration: Mountain People
The lessons of Soviet censorship could not have been clearer for Putin. He comes from St Petersburg, which in the 1970s and 1980s was home to the nation’s most powerful rock bands. Their music did as much as any politician to bring down the Soviet Union, and some musicians from that era have kept playing and have remained critical of the government.
In 2010, Putin had a much-publicized confrontation with one of them, Yuri Shevchuk of the band DDT, who told the Russian strongman that Russia was not a free country under his leadership.
However, the new generation of Russians does not listen to bands like Shevchuk’s. It listens to rap and for quite a while the Russian rap culture seemed compatible with the regime. In 2009, Putin went on the Muz TV channel to hand out awards in a youth culture contest named “Battle for Respect.”
Looking rather out of place in a sweater and jacket, he started off by saying that the art forms being honored — rap, graffiti and break dancing, were not of Russian origin, but should nevertheless be appreciated.
“In my view, any phenomenon, regardless of its country of origin and name, always deserves the support off both society and the state if there are two components: first, brilliant form, and second, constructive content,” he said.
Much of Russian rap in those days fit that definition. Timur Yunusov, aka Timati, the nation’s biggest hip-hop star (Snoop Dogg even appeared in one of his videos), was a Putin loyalist, and Roman Chumakov, aka Zhigan, the ex-convict who received the Battle for Respect award, pushed a brand of Russian patriotism that was to the national leader’s liking.
“I was a fool,” he rapped in 2013. “When I wanted to go away. I was a madman and no one could help me. I thought life would be sweeter over there and thought that crappy dollar could save everything. But I was wrong, how blind I was, man, when I ignored what was mine and tried to be different.”
For that kind of attitude, Putin, a former street kid himself, could tolerate a bit of petty criminality, macho posturing and fleeting references to drugs.
Even relatively recently, the Russian rap culture was not Putin-unfriendly. Last year, Vyacheslav Mashnov, aka Gnoiny or Slava KPSS, who has declared himself the Vladimir Putin of Russian rap (for the president’s macho qualities as well as his rejection of foreign influences), beat Oxford-educated and opposition-sympathizing Miron Fyodorov, aka Oxxxymiron, in an epic rap battle watched by more than 38 million people.
Many older Russians, for whom the battle was a revelation, were astonished by the rappers’ ability to reference Boris Pasternak and Aldous Huxley, as much as by the verbal violence they unleashed at each other. Gnoiny was even forgiven for the anti-Semitic hints he dropped (Oxxxymiron is Jewish). It looked as though Russia’s great poetic tradition was coming alive again — so what if some if its bearers respected Putin
However, living in Putin’s Russia, especially in its still desperately poor heartland, is no party. Even many of the more successful rappers are unable to break away from their roots and would lose their audience if they did. In 2014, Zhigan went to jail again for a year — for robbery, though he claimed that the victim, a producer, had owed him money.
He rapped his last word, saying he could not have gone to the authorities to get the debt back: “I am who I am.”
Last week, he and David Nuriev, aka Ptakha, were invited to the Russian parliament for a hearing about the concert cancelations, which had affected fellow rappers Egor Kreed, Husky, Allj and two pop groups, IC3PEAK and Friendzone. Ptakha, like Zhigan, was no opposition icon.
Last year, he recorded a popular video mocking the supporters of anti-corruption activist and Putin opponent Alexey Navalny: “Rich kids climbing street lamps, you’re the nation’s hope.”
Yet here Zhigan and Ptakha both were at the parliament, trying to explain to legislators and a hostile police official representing the Russian Ministry of the Interior that if rap songs mentioned drugs or violence, it was not their fault, it was Russian reality.
“Do you think you can help preserve morality” by banning concerts, Ptakha asked incredulously, “when every dog knows where to score dope ”
It did not work. After one of the legislators suggested that rappers complain to parliament when concerts get canceled, Zhigan apparently recalled his last word in court.
“This is a pointless conversation,” he told Ptakha before rising and walking out.
This was not about politics, just about an unbridgeable divide between the rappers and the audience on the one hand, and the state on the other.
Dmitry Kuznetsov, aka Husky, who was involved in the most notorious cancelation episode last month, did not suffer for agitating against Putin; in fact, he is known for playing in the unrecognized, Russian-backed Donetsk People Republic in eastern Ukraine and even recording a song about one of the “republic’s” fallen field commanders.
Rather, the problem was with Husky’s lyrics that police and various other public morality guardians consider extreme. His recent video, Judas, blocked on YouTube in Russia at the authorities’ request, but seen by more than 5 million people, shows him buying and using drugs.
“Which of you will give me up,” Husky raps, “before my blunt goes cold ”
The other affected rappers ostensibly have been stopped from playing in various Russian cities for similar reasons — after calls and letters to the authorities from concerned parents and morality activists.
When Husky was barred from playing at a club in the southern city of Krasnodar, he jumped on top of a car (he would later say that he thought its owner had encouraged him to do it) and started rapping.
“I will sing my music, hey, the most honest music, hey,” he intoned as hundreds of fans went wild, but police pulled Husky off the vehicle and he was sentenced to 12 days in prison.
By the time a court in Krasnodar lifted the sentence four days later, Oxxxymiron and two other rappers, the strongly anti-Putin Ivan Alexeyev, aka Noize MC, and Vasily Vakulenko, banned from Ukraine for playing concerts in annexed Crimea, had organized a concert in his support at one of Moscow’s biggest clubs.
“Darkness, debasement, drugs, guns are part of the modern world,” Oxxxymiron told the capacity crowd of about 3,000. “It’s not we, rappers, artists, who invent and spread them. Very different people do it. When one hears rap is to blame, no, it’s just a reflection, not the root cause.”
It is a short step from quarreling with the morality police to writing anti-government raps. This year, Ivan Dryomin, aka Face, previously not known for politicized lyrics, unexpectedly released a transparently political album.
“Since my birth, there has been no freedom in this country,” he rapped. “Here, bought judges ruin people’s lives, World Cups are just a reason to skim off cash, but nobody gives a **** among the gray apartment blocks.”
In October, the rapper canceled the tour he had planned to promote the album without a public explanation. If he had tried to go ahead, it is likely that the authorities would have treated him much as they reacted to IC3PEAK, which has had concerts canceled in multiple cities.
The group’s recent video shows the singer, Anastasia Kreslina, pretending to pour kerosene all over herself against the background of the Russian government building in Moscow.
“All of Russia is looking at me,” she sings. “Let everything burn, let everything burn.”
More such songs are definitely not what the Kremlin wants from a culture it has spent some effort to keep from turning hostile.
Sergey Kiriyenko, Putin’s deputy chief of staff in charge of domestic politics, last week told a conference of the ruling United Russia party that it would be “dumb” to ban concerts instead of “working” with young people and their culture.
Putin’s chief domestic propagandist, Dmitry Kiselyov, also took the rappers’ side in a recent edition of his weekly show on state TV.
“Rappers are like cats who walk by themselves,” he said, channeling Rudyard Kipling. “Organizing them into a herd is no simple task. At the very least, they shouldn’t be harassed.”
That attitude explains Putin’s orders on Tuesday last week to account for the concert cancelations. His interest in the matter is likely to cool down the morality defenders and let the rappers make a living for awhile.
However, it is not going to do much about the reality that feeds their poetry. Putting two and two together, as Face has done, is probably inevitable both for the artists and their mostly teenage audience. All Putin can hope to do is slow it down a little.
Leonid Bershidsky is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering European politics and business. He was the founding editor of the Russian business daily Vedomosti and founded the opinion Web site Slon.ru.
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Keelung Mayor George Hsieh (謝國樑) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Tuesday last week apologized over allegations that the former director of the city’s Civil Affairs Department had illegally accessed citizens’ data to assist the KMT in its campaign to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) councilors. Given the public discontent with opposition lawmakers’ disruptive behavior in the legislature, passage of unconstitutional legislation and slashing of the central government’s budget, civic groups have launched a massive campaign to recall KMT lawmakers. The KMT has tried to fight back by initiating campaigns to recall DPP lawmakers, but the petition documents they