China must play a leading role if the world is to draw up a new and more effective strategy to halt the collapse of life on Earth, senior delegates at the close of last week’s UN biodiversity conference said.
With the US absent, Europe distracted and Brazil tilting away from global cooperation, the onus has shifted toward Beijing, the diplomats said after two weeks of slow-moving talks on how to maintain the natural infrastructure on which humanity depends.
China will host the next high-level negotiations in 2020, which is to be the most important in more than 10 years. This is the deadline for nations to agree on fresh global targets for the protection and management of forests, rivers, oceans, pollinators and other wildlife.
Conservationists hope this “new deal for nature and people” becomes as much of a priority as the Paris climate accord and helps to reverse the current wave of extinction, which is at the highest rate the world has seen since the age of the dinosaurs.
Over the coming two years, China should champion the cause of nature as France championed the cause of climate in the run-up to the Paris deal in 2016, the diplomats said.
“China is very important. It can be a great leader,” said Mexican Director-General of International Cooperation Hesiquio Benitez Diaz, who helped organize the previous global biodiversity conference. “We’re reaching the point of no return for many species. It’s really bad, but people don’t see this issue.”
Rather than leaving biodiversity on the fringes, where it has until now been dealt with mostly by politically weak environment ministers and non-governmental organizations (NGO), he hoped Beijing would use its clout to ensure the subject was high on the agenda of G8 and G20 summits, and to press for participation by heads of state in 2020.
They also want the issue to be taken up by communities, companies and individuals.
The message was echoed by Cristiana Paca Palmer, executive secretary of the biodiversity convention.
“We tell China that the biodiversity agenda needs a lot of championing,” she said. “They were instrumental in the success of Paris and they can play a very important role.”
Until recently, China’s dire pollution problems and woeful record on wildlife conservation meant it would have been an unlikely champion of nature.
However, under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) perceptions have started to shift.
The government has promoted the concept of “ecological conservation,” established hundreds of environmental courts and played a positive role in global climate talks.
At the conference, Beijing sent mixed messages. It initially ignored a proposal to get involved in preparations with Mexico (the previous host) and Egypt (the host this year), and it remained low-key in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, over the past two weeks of talks.
“We were very nervous about their silence,” one foreign diplomat said.
However, those familiar with the Chinese delegation said this reflected a difference of approach.
Rather than set ambitious public goals, they said the country preferred to set expectations low and work at a higher level behind the scenes.
“They are really determined to succeed, but they don’t know how to do it,” another source said.
A shift in pace and priorities is essential. Delegate after delegate in Sharm el-Sheikh warned of risks to food production and human wellbeing from the loss of corals, forests and the 60 percent loss of biodiversity since 1972.
There was recognition that the current global management plan has been a failure: Among the 20 Aichi biodiversity targets, only one — on the creation of protected areas — is measurably close to being met.
Highlighting the low priority that even the host government put on nature, a shop near the conference center was openly selling an illegal lion hide for US$1,500.
This convention established a process to draw-up a “Post-2020 Road Map” with more forceful and effective goals.
However, the political winds are even less favorable than in 2010. Brazil, which played an important role eight years ago, will soon have a far-right government and its diplomats spent much of the time on niggling issues that could have an impact on exploitation of its world-leading biodiversity. At one point the conference spent 35 minutes debating whether to be “concerned” or “deeply concerned” about the impact of climate change.
A row broke out between developing and developed nations over how to share the economic benefits from genetic sequencing information. Tense negotiations were also needed to set new guidelines for gene drive technology, which can be used to eradicate entire species.
Governments stopped short of imposing a moratorium, but built in strong precautions by insisting that no research be allowed without risk assessment, risk management and the consent of any communities who might be affected by the release of modified organisms.
Crucially, the delegates struggled to identify what kind of target should be set. There was widespread agreement that biodiversity needed a single measurable headline goal — equivalent to the 1.5oC to 2oC in climate negotiations.
However, there is, as yet, no single metric that can cover the complex interaction of life on Earth. Instead, discussions centered on setting either zero net loss of natural habitat or a broad goal to “bend the curve,” which means reverse biodiversity loss worldwide through a series of bottom-up national commitments and wider demarcations of nature reserves, protected areas and traditional or indigenous community land.
Pooven Moodley, executive director of the NGO Natural Justice, said that the conference had seen progress in terms of greater recognition of the need for improved environmental rights and more land tenure for indigenous groups.
However, overall the negotiations had failed to take into account the urgency of the crisis, he said.
“It does feel like rearranging the deckchairs as the Titanic sinks,” he said.
Frustrations were also expressed by Ruth Davis, deputy director of global programs at the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds.
“I am used to the UN — its ups and downs — but it’s still disorienting listening to hours of wrangling over single words in obscure documents in empty rooms when this is supposed — quite literally — to be about a plan to save life on Earth,” she tweeted.
Despite occasional grumbles, delegates said the situation would be worse without the convention, which at least obliges governments to assess biodiversity and report every four years — with the exception of the US, which is the only nation that does not take part.
Protected areas — the one concrete target from 2010 — have expanded substantially in the past eight years. Conservation efforts have also helped to pull a few species, including whales and mountain gorillas, back from the brink of extinction.
UN head of biodiversity Pasca Palmer said she too wanted more urgency, but she remained optimistic that a deal could be done in 2020.
“The best possible outcome would be to have a clear recognition that biodiversity is infrastructure affecting life and development. We have to govern in a holistic way, not just one species, and we need to make it clear in people’s minds that without it, we won’t have a healthy planet,” Palmer said.
China will have its work cut out.
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
This should be the year in which the democracies, especially those in East Asia, lose their fear of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “one China principle” plus its nuclear “Cognitive Warfare” coercion strategies, all designed to achieve hegemony without fighting. For 2025, stoking regional and global fear was a major goal for the CCP and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA), following on Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Little Red Book admonition, “We must be ruthless to our enemies; we must overpower and annihilate them.” But on Dec. 17, 2025, the Trump Administration demonstrated direct defiance of CCP terror with its record US$11.1 billion arms
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
As technological change sweeps across the world, the focus of education has undergone an inevitable shift toward artificial intelligence (AI) and digital learning. However, the HundrED Global Collection 2026 report has a message that Taiwanese society and education policymakers would do well to reflect on. In the age of AI, the scarcest resource in education is not advanced computing power, but people; and the most urgent global educational crisis is not technological backwardness, but teacher well-being and retention. Covering 52 countries, the report from HundrED, a Finnish nonprofit that reviews and compiles innovative solutions in education from around the world, highlights a
RSS