A year of warming relations between North and South Korea has raised the prospects of closer ties, if not some form of unification for the still-warring neighbors far in the future, but it might not be obvious in a typical South Korean classroom.
“I really don’t know anything,” 17-year-old student Roh Ha-na said. “It’s like only twice a year that the school teaches about unification and national security, and about North Korean life ... but I just let most of it go in one ear and out the other.”
This year’s inter-Korean detente has highlighted what many observers see as a lack of knowledge among South Koreans about their neighbor, prompting government efforts to revamp the way South Koreans learn about North Korea and unification.
Baek Jun-kee, the head of South Korea’s Institute for Unification Education, said current education methods have failed to show young South Koreans the importance of a nuanced understanding of North Korea, its people and leader Kim Jong-un.
“If we don’t approach the issue in a rational manner or show how the issue affects [students’] personal lives in middle school or high school, it will be difficult to keep their attention,” Baek told reporters in an interview.
The education shortcomings are contributing to a shortage of North Korea experts across public and private institutions at a time when increased cultural and governmental exchanges between the two Koreas make them all the more important, analysts said.
“Every regional government has rolled out plans for inter-Korean exchange, but they don’t have any experts, no knowledge, no networks,” said Hong Min, a research fellow at the Korea Institute for National Unification. “When the heads of South Korean conglomerates went along to the September Pyongyang summit, most of them didn’t have an in-house North Korea expert to brief the chief.”
After facing criticism at a parliamentary hearing earlier this month over funding cuts to education programs, South Korean Minister of Unification Cho Myoung-gyon told lawmakers that creating a new curriculum on unification was “crucial and urgent.”
Cut off from the North for 70 years and still technically at war after the Korean War ended in a truce, not a peace treaty, many South Koreans have come to see unification as an increasingly distant and unrealistic goal.
Surveys have shown that younger South Koreans are particularly ignorant or apathetic about their northern neighbors, seeing them as a troublesome distraction from the more pressing concerns of work or school.
Interviews with 17 high-school students revealed most had never heard of the “parallel progress” policy key to North Korean affairs this decade.
Most did not know about the growth of private markets that has transformed many areas of North Korea’s economy.
“I’ve never heard about these North Korean issues in school, aside from learning about the Korean War in history class,” said Moon So-in, a 17-year-old student at Sunil Girls’ High School. “My friends don’t seem very interested, since we are so used to being a divided country.”
Education in South Korea is focused on competing for college entrance, culminating in high-pressure nationwide exams in the last year of high school, on which students stake their futures.
North Korea is “not on the test,” students and teachers said, and is therefore seen as a “waste of precious time,” high-school teacher Choi Ki-bok said.
Generally, North Korea is addressed in a single chapter once a year in fourth and sixth grades, briefly in middle school and once in high school, two teachers said.
In higher education, meanwhile, five out of six North Korean studies departments at South Korean universities have been shut down or changed into other programs in the past few years, in part because of a lack of applicants.
In North Korea, the South appears to be discussed more often in schools. As well as propaganda, North Korean defectors have said they were taught minute details about the South.
“I was taught South Korean geography down to what minerals and grains are produced in each region, history that happened on South Korean soil,” said Park Na-ri, a North Korean defector educator who taught Korean and literature in Pyongyang and now teaches defector children in Seoul.
“I was shocked to find South Koreans know much less about where anything in North Korea is,” she said, adding that ignorance can lead to a lack of empathy for North Koreans.
Five South Korean educators interviewed by reporters said teachers do not feel equipped to navigate the thorny issue of North Korea, which in the words of one high-school teacher is “an enemy, a long-lost brother and a separate country sharing a border, depending on who you ask.”
The Institute for Unification Education, which oversees all lower education on North Korea, said it is setting up the first-ever year-long training programs for teachers to learn how to teach North Korea.
That would include a shift away from rote teaching on unification as a given to a more flexible approach focused more on the goal of peace and designed to spark discussions among students.
This year, the 91-page Unification Education Guidelines was cut down to 48 pages and renamed Unification and Peace Education, Directions and Viewpoints, mirroring South Korean President Moon Jae-in’s argument that reaching peace with the North is a more pressing and realistic goal than full unification.
Additional reporting by Shin Hyon-hee
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Keelung Mayor George Hsieh (謝國樑) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Tuesday last week apologized over allegations that the former director of the city’s Civil Affairs Department had illegally accessed citizens’ data to assist the KMT in its campaign to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) councilors. Given the public discontent with opposition lawmakers’ disruptive behavior in the legislature, passage of unconstitutional legislation and slashing of the central government’s budget, civic groups have launched a massive campaign to recall KMT lawmakers. The KMT has tried to fight back by initiating campaigns to recall DPP lawmakers, but the petition documents they
RSS