A year of warming relations between North and South Korea has raised the prospects of closer ties, if not some form of unification for the still-warring neighbors far in the future, but it might not be obvious in a typical South Korean classroom.
“I really don’t know anything,” 17-year-old student Roh Ha-na said. “It’s like only twice a year that the school teaches about unification and national security, and about North Korean life ... but I just let most of it go in one ear and out the other.”
This year’s inter-Korean detente has highlighted what many observers see as a lack of knowledge among South Koreans about their neighbor, prompting government efforts to revamp the way South Koreans learn about North Korea and unification.
Baek Jun-kee, the head of South Korea’s Institute for Unification Education, said current education methods have failed to show young South Koreans the importance of a nuanced understanding of North Korea, its people and leader Kim Jong-un.
“If we don’t approach the issue in a rational manner or show how the issue affects [students’] personal lives in middle school or high school, it will be difficult to keep their attention,” Baek told reporters in an interview.
The education shortcomings are contributing to a shortage of North Korea experts across public and private institutions at a time when increased cultural and governmental exchanges between the two Koreas make them all the more important, analysts said.
“Every regional government has rolled out plans for inter-Korean exchange, but they don’t have any experts, no knowledge, no networks,” said Hong Min, a research fellow at the Korea Institute for National Unification. “When the heads of South Korean conglomerates went along to the September Pyongyang summit, most of them didn’t have an in-house North Korea expert to brief the chief.”
After facing criticism at a parliamentary hearing earlier this month over funding cuts to education programs, South Korean Minister of Unification Cho Myoung-gyon told lawmakers that creating a new curriculum on unification was “crucial and urgent.”
Cut off from the North for 70 years and still technically at war after the Korean War ended in a truce, not a peace treaty, many South Koreans have come to see unification as an increasingly distant and unrealistic goal.
Surveys have shown that younger South Koreans are particularly ignorant or apathetic about their northern neighbors, seeing them as a troublesome distraction from the more pressing concerns of work or school.
Interviews with 17 high-school students revealed most had never heard of the “parallel progress” policy key to North Korean affairs this decade.
Most did not know about the growth of private markets that has transformed many areas of North Korea’s economy.
“I’ve never heard about these North Korean issues in school, aside from learning about the Korean War in history class,” said Moon So-in, a 17-year-old student at Sunil Girls’ High School. “My friends don’t seem very interested, since we are so used to being a divided country.”
Education in South Korea is focused on competing for college entrance, culminating in high-pressure nationwide exams in the last year of high school, on which students stake their futures.
North Korea is “not on the test,” students and teachers said, and is therefore seen as a “waste of precious time,” high-school teacher Choi Ki-bok said.
Generally, North Korea is addressed in a single chapter once a year in fourth and sixth grades, briefly in middle school and once in high school, two teachers said.
In higher education, meanwhile, five out of six North Korean studies departments at South Korean universities have been shut down or changed into other programs in the past few years, in part because of a lack of applicants.
In North Korea, the South appears to be discussed more often in schools. As well as propaganda, North Korean defectors have said they were taught minute details about the South.
“I was taught South Korean geography down to what minerals and grains are produced in each region, history that happened on South Korean soil,” said Park Na-ri, a North Korean defector educator who taught Korean and literature in Pyongyang and now teaches defector children in Seoul.
“I was shocked to find South Koreans know much less about where anything in North Korea is,” she said, adding that ignorance can lead to a lack of empathy for North Koreans.
Five South Korean educators interviewed by reporters said teachers do not feel equipped to navigate the thorny issue of North Korea, which in the words of one high-school teacher is “an enemy, a long-lost brother and a separate country sharing a border, depending on who you ask.”
The Institute for Unification Education, which oversees all lower education on North Korea, said it is setting up the first-ever year-long training programs for teachers to learn how to teach North Korea.
That would include a shift away from rote teaching on unification as a given to a more flexible approach focused more on the goal of peace and designed to spark discussions among students.
This year, the 91-page Unification Education Guidelines was cut down to 48 pages and renamed Unification and Peace Education, Directions and Viewpoints, mirroring South Korean President Moon Jae-in’s argument that reaching peace with the North is a more pressing and realistic goal than full unification.
Additional reporting by Shin Hyon-hee
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS