The launch of the Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hong Kong Express Rail Link on Sunday has been welcomed by many Hong Kongers. However, it is also the cause of serious concern for many others. Behind these doubts is the well-founded distrust people have toward Beijing’s intentions.
In normal circumstances, the announcement of a new, rapid, modern rail link would be an entirely positive event. The link promises to significantly cut the travel time between the economic hubs of Guangdong, Shenzhen and Hong Kong, as well as other cities in the “Greater Bay Area.”
It would also give passengers from Hong Kong access to the 25,000km high-speed rail network in China.
Such advantages should provide real economic benefits to business, industry and tourism in Hong Kong and China.
What is not to like?
The crux of the problem is the “colocation arrangement“ between the Chinese and Hong Kong governments.
It includes the creation of a Mainland Port Area, staffed by Chinese immigration and customs officers, within the West Kowloon terminus in Hong Kong. The area is leased to China and falls under its legal jurisdiction. This means that China will, for the first time, have an area within Hong Kong territory in which its laws apply in their entirety and Hong Kong’s Basic Law does not.
The arrangement is supposed to maximize convenience for passengers traveling between the two areas. It is not entirely different from arrangements on other borders, such as the US-Canadian border or for the Eurostar journey between the UK and France.
According to Philip Dykes, chairman of the Hong Kong Bar Association, the colocation arrangement differs from other border customs agreements in that the Chinese authorities have full jurisdiction: They have the right to detain and remove, not simply refuse entry.
In addition, the laws in the respective territories have significant differences.
For example, Hong Kong police must release suspects after 72 hours if not charged. In China, police can detain people for up to 37 days without formally arresting them. Even after that, they do not have to charge them for months.
After the cross-border kidnapping by Chinese public security agents of then-Causeway Bay Books manager Lam Wing-kei (林榮基), this legitimately rings alarm bells. All Chinese authorities need to do now if they want to detain Hong Kongers is to lure them into the West Kowloon terminus.
Aside from these concerns, there are also the longer-term implications of Beijing’s gradual erosion of Hong Kong’s autonomy and the “one country, two systems” model, which have stepped up a notch under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平).
It is, unfortunately, implicit in the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) assumption of an uninterrupted hold on power that the party has the luxury of playing the long game.
Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam (林鄭月娥) has said the concerns are unfounded. On Dec. 29 last year, the Hong Kong Government issued a response to concerns over the colocation arrangement, saying it would in no way contravene the Basic Law or the “one country, two systems” model.
Despite these assurances, the degree of distrust in the intentions of Beijing, even over a project that is supposed to bring real economic benefits, is both palpable and well-founded.
Hong Kong operates under the “one country, two systems” model. This model is what Beijing has in mind when it talks of administering Taiwan, should it ever manage to orchestrate a peaceful unification of the two nations.
Beijing’s pernicious erosion of Hong Kong’s presumed guarantees under this system can in no way recommend it to Taiwanese.
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
The bird flu outbreak at US dairy farms keeps finding alarming new ways to surprise scientists. Last week, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) confirmed that H5N1 is spreading not just from birds to herds, but among cows. Meanwhile, media reports say that an unknown number of cows are asymptomatic. Although the risk to humans is still low, it is clear that far more work needs to be done to get a handle on the reach of the virus and how it is being transmitted. That would require the USDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to get
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
On April 11, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida delivered a speech at a joint meeting of the US Congress in Washington, in which he said that “China’s current external stance and military actions present an unprecedented and the greatest strategic challenge … to the peace and stability of the international community.” Kishida emphasized Japan’s role as “the US’ closest ally.” “The international order that the US worked for generations to build is facing new challenges,” Kishida said. “I understand it is a heavy burden to carry such hopes on your shoulders,” he said. “Japan is already standing shoulder to shoulder