In December 1966, Liu Tao (劉濤), daughter of then-Chinese state chairman Liu Shaoqi (劉少奇), wrote a “big character poster” under the title “Rebel against Liu Shaoqi, follow chairman Mao and carry out revolution all my life.” Less than a week later, she and her brother Liu Yunzhen (劉允真) wrote another poster with the headline “Look, the ugly soul of Liu Shaoqi.”
During China’s Cultural Revolution, countless sycophants put their parents through hell by drawing a line between themselves and their parents to demonstrate their loyalty to Chinese Communist Party chairman Mao Zedong (毛澤東). Such acts often caused irreparable rifts between family members.
Chinese film director Zhang Yimou (張藝謀) said: “When you talk about things like ‘selling out’ and ‘denouncing,’ in those days they were commonplace. It was called ‘drawing a line.’ Drawing a line between yourself and your father’s generation — it happened all over the place... I recently had a conversation with some young filmgoers and they asked whether it was not really too cold-hearted to do such a thing. I said that cold is the wrong word for it. It was hot-blooded. What was it? It was devotion. For someone to draw a line out of their devotion to the times and their beliefs, that was drawing a line in a hot-blooded way. So it was something that happened in those days in particular. Nowadays, a lot of young people who see my film think it seems very special, but actually anyone who lived through those times knows that things like that really happened a lot.”
Taiwan-based bakery cafe 85°C was forced to draw a line between itself and Taiwan just because President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) had a cup of coffee at one of its stores in Los Angeles.
In December last year, broadcasts of the TV drama series My Dear Boy (我的男孩), starring and produced by Taiwanese actress Ruby Lin (林心如), were halted in China because the production was subsidized by the Ministry of Culture. To get the ban lifted, Lin was forced to draw a line between herself and Taiwan.
Early this month, Taiwanese actress Vivian Sung (宋芸樺) had to do the same thing, for the sake of the Chinese market.
During the Cultural Revolution, people were forced to draw a line between themselves and their parents to show their devotion to the state. What Zhang calls “something special that happened in those days” is now being revived in China, where Taiwanese businesses and entertainers are forced to draw a line between themselves and their “mother” — Taiwan — and express their devotion to China instead.
The kind of lunacy that happened under the centralized rule of Mao, who fostered a cult of personality, has reappeared under the rule of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), who likewise promotes worship of himself.
It is said that history does not repeat itself, but what happens later often strongly resembles what happened before.
It is also said that those whom the gods would destroy, they first make mad. The Cultural Revolution held China back for at least 20 years.
Will the lunacy of today’s new cultural revolution cause Xi’s “Chinese dream” to crumble and fall? Only time will tell.
Yu Kung is a businessman.
Translated by Julian Clegg
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
RSS