When the family of the mazajzajngilajng (“community leader”) of the Paiwan Tjarilik community in Taitung County was brewing millet wine in preparation for their harvest festival a few days ago, they were questioned by police and the wine was confiscated for making alcohol for sale in contravention of articles 45 and 46 of the Tobacco and Alcohol Administration Act (菸酒管理法), to which the community reacted strongly.
This is the harvest season for millet, the most-prized crop among Taiwan’s Aborigines. Regardless of whether it is a good or a poor harvest, the community will follow the traditions passed down by their ancestors and hold libation ceremonies to give thanks to the earth god, the millet goddess and the mountain, forest and river gods to reward them and ask for their blessings.
At the ceremony, the community gathers to eat and drink food and wine made from millet. It is during such gatherings with relatives and friends, young and old, that the stories and tales of their culture are passed on.
These ceremonies are held in turn in Pingtung, Taitung and Hualien counties, and are conducted by Aboriginal communities along the Central Mountain Range. The gratitude and respect expressed toward gods, spirits, earth and crops is a ritual and a pledge that has continued uninterrupted for hundreds of years.
Aboriginal legends and myths stress that if these rituals and ceremonies are not complete and lack respect, the crops will fail, as it would imply that farming is not seen as important, making another good harvest difficult.
Brewing millet wine for the festival is necessary, as the millet cake, meat and other offerings must be accompanied by millet wine when they are given to the gods and spirits. It is also how a community expresses its respect and gratitude.
Some communities sing and dance, such as the Amis, while others, such as the Puyuma and Tsou peoples, maintain a solemn silence throughout, without any talk, song or dance.
These traditions and customs have been passed down for at least 1,000 years.
Someone allegedly reported the tribal leader for brewing and selling the wine, and when investigators asked about the price, he said: “About NT$200.” That was enough to determine that he had broken the law.
It is fortunate that these rituals can continue, as they are a symbol of the continued strength of the communities’ cultures, but that they became the target of legal interference is very upsetting.
Could it really be that the county government and police are so completely disconnected from daily life that they do not even know that the Paiwan people brew wine for their harvest festival or that these festivals exist, or that they think that the Amis are the only people who follow this ritual?
The Paiwan people, the Tjarilik community, the harvest festival and the brewing of millet wine have existed far longer than this nation.
The laws that police rely on and their lack of cultural understanding is flabbergasting.
Pasuya Poiconu is a professor in the Department of Indigenous Affairs and Development at National Dong Hwa University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
Deflation in China is persisting, raising growing concerns domestically and internationally. Beijing’s stimulus policies introduced in September last year have largely been short-lived in financial markets and negligible in the real economy. Recent data showing disproportionately low bank loan growth relative to the expansion of the money supply suggest the limited effectiveness of the measures. Many have urged the government to take more decisive action, particularly through fiscal expansion, to avoid a deep deflationary spiral akin to Japan’s experience in the early 1990s. While Beijing’s policy choices remain uncertain, questions abound about the possible endgame for the Chinese economy if no decisive