There have been discussions with CPC Corp, Taiwan, about building liquefied natural gas terminals in Taoyuan’s Guantang (觀塘) and the Port of Taipei.
CPC was concerned about the financial feasibility if a terminal were also built at the Port of Taipei, as it would have no specific target to supply gas to.
An environmental impact assessment committee recently turned down the Guantang project, which is a good decision.
Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) and CPC could once again become competitors by building a terminal at the Port of Taipei to supply gas to the Datan (大潭) power plant and even the Hsieh-ho (協和) and Shenao (深澳) power plants.
This project could emulate Taiwan’s offshore wind power projects by importing foreign technology, forming a national team and allowing partial international ownership of the shares.
The decision to shut down the Guantang project could impede the government’s goal of generating 50 percent of electricity from gas by 2025.
However, that would be a good thing, as it could make northern Taiwan a cleaner place with less respiratory problems among its residents and safer energy.
The Port of Taipei boasts a large hinterland, and providing natural gas storage for more than 24 days would not be a problem.
The effect on PM2.5 concentrations of an energy structure consisting of natural gas complemented by renewable energy would only be 1.4 percent that of coal-fired power plants, and there would be no heavy metal pollution, so it would be no problem to install additional natural gas power generator units.
Once there is ample electricity, energy provision would not be an issue for northern Taiwan even with electricity-intensive businesses, such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co and artificial intelligence businesses.
With these businesses, students in northern Taiwan would also have high-paying job opportunities after graduation.
It would also be a good thing for residents of New Taipei City’s Bali District (八里). Although the Port of Taipei is planning the third and fourth land reclamation phases to be able to move chemical and oil storage tanks, funds and scheduling have repeatedly posed problems.
Building a natural gas terminal at the port would cost about NT$60 billion (US$1.96 billion) if it were to meet quality requirements and be completed on time.
If a gas terminal and storage tanks are built on the third and fourth phases of land reclamation, which are 2km offshore from Bali and 4km to 5km from the district’s Syun Tang Borough (訊塘里), that would offer a safety distance 10 to 25 rimes as much as required, and residents would not have to worry about the safety of natural gas storage and oil pollution.
Establishing a terminal at the port is the most beneficial plan for northern Taiwan’s energy security. It would also benefit central and southern Taiwan.
In winter, strong winds and big waves in Guantang would make it difficult for ships to approach and leave the terminal.
If gas provision is not stable by the winter of 2025 and there is heavy air pollution, that would require the old coal-fired Taichung Power Plant to be reopened, which would put an end to air pollution reduction in central and southern Taiwan and to efforts to reduce the high death rates caused by respiratory diseases in Changhua and Yunlin counties.
The Guantang project’s failure is the starting point for building a healthy and wealthy northern Taiwan and will benefit the whole country.
Tsuang Ben-jei is a professor in the Department of Environmental Engineering at National Chung Hsing University.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
RSS