On May 19, a Chinese television station displayed its so-called creative and politically correct poker card design featuring images of “Taiwan independence supporters.”
It is a pity that the company did not also design playing cards featuring the pro-unification activists preferred by Beijing, so that Chinese could also see what they look like.
The pro-independence playing cards exposed how ignorant China’s “united front” tactics are. Perhaps Beijing was trying to narrow its scope of attack by changing its target from all Taiwanese to a few individuals; making examples of the 13 A-list figures to warn others, similar to how one might put heads on spikes or “kill the chicken to frighten the monkey,” as they say in Chinese.
By doing so, it could then comfort and deceive itself that the pro-independence activists in Taiwan are but a handful of people.
The Chinese Communist Party regime is arrogant, egotistical, autocratic and reckless. It shows no respect for its own people and does not know that legitimacy of rule comes from free elections.
The 13 pro-independence playing cards are unlikely to intimidate Taiwanese. More pro-independence activists might even protest against Beijing, while blaming themselves for not working as hard as Alliance of Referendum for Taiwan convener Tsay Ting-kuei (蔡丁貴), whose image is one of those on the cards.
The 13 cards prove that Taiwan and China are two nations on the two sides of the Taiwan Strait.
Of Taiwan’s four directly elected presidents, two former presidents — Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) — as well as President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) feature on the cards.
Others include a former vice president, two former premiers and Premier William Lai (賴清德).
Since pro-independence activists were able to be elected as presidents, this shows that Taiwan is an independent, sovereign state.
The Chinese TV station is simply consoling itself at home with the pro-independence playing cards.
If China was confident, it would design playing cards featuring those who identify with the “motherland.” It might even be more fun to play with both sets of cards.
Since Beijing knows all too well which Taiwanese travel to China for personal gain and take its orders to assist in Taiwan’s demise, it would not be difficult to design a set of pro-unification playing cards.
What we can be sure of is that those featuring on the pro-unification cards would include former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), who was elected thanks to his screaming female fans; former Bamboo Union leader Chang An-le (張安樂), also known as the “White Wolf,” who is backed by both his gang and the communists; former KMT chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱), who is willing but unable to lead the unification camp; China Times Group chairman Tsai Eng-meng (蔡衍明), who has made a fortune in China; and the descendants of the Chiang (蔣) dynasty.
Maybe KMT Chairman Wu Den-yih (吳敦義), with his trademark crew cut, could also be added to the list.
If we compare those who would likely be on the pro-unification playing cards with those on the pro-independence cards, there seems to be a huge gap between them in terms of character and reputation.
Some might feel lucky that they do not feature on the pro-unification cards, but surely no one would protest if they were not listed with people such as Wu.
James Wang is a senior journalist.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations