In Dubai’s decades-old Gold Souk, customers from around the world haggle over bangles and necklaces. Elsewhere in the emirate, the region’s top center for gold trade, bullion is playing a new role in financial engineering.
OneGram, a local start-up founded last year, is issuing a gold-backed cryptocurrency — part of efforts to convince Muslims that investing in cryptocurrencies complies with their faith.
The global surge of interest in bitcoin, ethereum and other cryptocurrencies extends into the Gulf and Southeast Asia, the main centers of Islamic finance.
However, because they are products of financial engineering and objects of speculation, cryptocurrencies sit uneasily with Islam. Shariah principles, in addition to banning interest payments, emphasize real economic activity based on physical assets and frown on pure monetary speculation.
That has triggered debate among Islamic scholars over whether cryptocurrencies are religiously permissible. Cryptocurrency companies are seeking to sway the debate by launching instruments based on physical assets and certified as valid by Islamic advisers.
Each OneGram cryptocurrency unit is backed by at least 1g of physical gold stored in a vault. The idea is to limit speculation.
“Gold was among the first forms of money in Islamic societies so this is appropriate,” said Ibrahim Mohammed, the Briton who founded the firm with other investors last year. “We are trying to prove rules and regulations from Shariah are fully compatible with digital blockchain technology.”
Tens of millions of dollars worth of the currency have been issued so far. About 60 percent of the planned number of coins remains to be sold; OneGram hopes to issue them all before listing them on exchanges at the end of next month.
OneGram obtained a ruling that its cryptocurrency conforms with Islamic principles from Dubai-based Al Maali Consulting Group.
It is one of dozens of advisory firms around the world that offer their opinion on whether financial instruments meet Shariah standards.
In Malaysia, HelloGold Foundation launched an initial offer of its gold-backed cryptocurrency in October last year, receiving approval from Islamic scholars at Kuala Lumpur-based Amanie Advisors.
HelloGold chief marketing officer Manuel Ho said its coin was Islamic as transactions occurred within a defined period, making them less volatile and addressing the issue of ambiguity of pricing.
Among other experiments, United Arab Emirates (UAE)-based Halal Chain conducted an initial coin offer in December last year, which is linked to data on Islamically permissible goods.
SHARIAH COMMITTEES
Only about 20 to 30 percent of banking in the Gulf and Southeast Asia follows Islamic principles; many Muslims use conventional finance if it offers higher returns or more convenience.
However, the issue of religious permissibility is influential and could determine whether Muslim funds and institutions, which are formally committed to Shariah principles, deal in cryptocurrencies.
“One of the biggest difficulties is that there is so much to talk about and so little certainty in the way crypto will be playing out,” said Ziyaad Mahomed of HSBC Amanah in Malaysia.
He chairs its Shariah committee, which oversees Islamic transactions.
National Shariah authorities have not ruled on whether cryptocurrencies are permissible, and while several global bodies recommend standards for Islamic finance, none has the authority to impose them.
Many governments seem ambivalent, worried about the potential for instability, but unwilling to lose the chance of benefiting from new technology.
The Saudi Arabian and UAE central banks warned their citizens about the risks of trading bitcoin, but have not imposed outright bans.
That leaves Muslim investors to choose between sometimes conflicting judgements by academics at advisory firms, financial companies and academic institutions.
One of the earliest rulings came in 2014, when California-based academic Monzer Kahf, a prominent author of Islamic finance textbooks, deemed bitcoin a legitimate medium of exchange, though vulnerable to manipulation.
Since then, Muslim jurists in South Africa have ruled in favor of cryptocurrencies, saying they have become socially acceptable and commonly used, Mahomed said.
However, in October last year, the Durban-based Darul Ihsan Centre refrained from endorsing them, citing concern over potential pyramid schemes.
Some scholars in Turkey, India and Britain have labeled them impermissible; Egypt’s Grand Mufti declared in January that they should not be traded.
Complicating the debate is the fact that there are hundreds of digital coins or tokens, each with unique features related to distribution, mining and trading, said Farrukh Habib, research officer at Malaysia-based International Shariah Research Academy for Islamic Finance.
“They are also very different in terms of their underlying commodities, projects or businesses, so it’s not appropriate to have a blanket Shariah ruling for all,” Habib said.
He is involved in a project to categorize cryptocurrencies based on Shariah-compliance criteria.
“Most of the existing Shariah rulings either deal with only bitcoin, or include all types of cryptocurrencies, disregarding their peculiarities,” he said.
COMPLEXITIES
Another problem is that many Shariah scholars have trouble understanding the complexities of digital currencies, said Harris Irfan, managing director at Cordoba Capital in London.
“I would caution against accepting any fatwas from community scholars on the subject of fiqh al-mu’amalat, the jurisprudence of transactions, which is a highly complex area of Shariah,” Irfan said.
Irfan chairs the UK Islamic Fintech Panel, a London-based think tank which is drafting guidelines for accreditation of Shariah-compliant fintech products including cryptocurrencies.
Mahomed said some degree of consensus had emerged globally that cryptocurrencies were a form of wealth, or maal — one step toward acceptance.
However, academics have yet to rule conclusively on whether cryptocurrencies are currencies. This is important for Islamic tax payments called zakat, and for inheritances.
“Overall, more evidence is needed to reach a consensus, at least until higher bodies pronounce themselves on the issue, such as the Islamic Fiqh Academy,” Mahomed said, referring to an influential Jeddah-based institution.
Abdulqahir Qamar, director of the Fatwa Department at the Fiqh Academy, said that the academy had not issued any resolutions on cryptocurrencies, but was planning to discuss the subject during one of its official sessions this year.
While there is no firm time frame, the academy would also seek to organize seminars with scholars on the matter, he said.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS