Junko Iizuka* was 16 when she was taken to a clinic in northeast Japan and forced to have a mystery operation that, she later discovered, would prevent her from ever having children.
“I was given anesthetic and I didn’t remember anything after that,” she said.
“When I woke up, I was in a bed and I saw a sink. I wanted to have some water, but I was told I wasn’t allowed to drink,” she said.
Iizuka had been working for a family as a live-in housekeeper at the time. It was only later when she overheard her parents talking that she learned the shocking truth: She had become one of 16,500 people subjected to forced sterilization under a Japanese law that was aimed at stopping the birth of “inferior” children.
Her uterine tubes were tied in 1963 because she was suspected of having a mental disability. Fifty-five years on, her voice wavers as she describes the impact: persistent stomach pains and a heavy psychological burden.
“I went to Tokyo to see if I could get the operation reversed, but I was told it wouldn’t be possible,” she said. “They stole my life away.”
Another victim of forced sterilization, Yumi Sato*, was 15 when the procedure was done in 1972.
Sato’s sister-in-law, Michiko*, said this ended up harming her prospects of marriage.
“When she was about 22 or 23 there was talk of marriage, but then when she said that she couldn’t have children, then the person who had proposed to her said that they didn’t want to marry her,” Michiko said.
“At that time, normal thinking was that you’d marry to have children, so it was hard to get married if you couldn’t have children,” Michiko said.
Sato recently launched a lawsuit seeking compensation from the Japanese government over the procedure, arguing the Eugenic Protection Law breached the nation’s postwar constitution, because it infringed on people’s right to the pursuit of happiness.
It is the first such case in Japan and other victims hope it will help pave the way for a broader public apology by the government.
Official records show that Sato was sterilized because of a diagnosis of “hereditary feeble-mindedness.” However, her family disputes the claim of a hereditary condition, saying that she had suffered brain damage because she was given too much anesthetic when she received surgery for a cleft palate as a young child.
Michiko, who has lived with her sister-in-law for more than 40 years, said Sato is a much-loved member of her family.
When Michiko’s children were young, Sato helped look after them and change nappies.
Michiko said it might have been difficult for Sato to have raised children of her own, “but the fact that that right was taken away from her is really a crime.”
At the first hearing at the Sendai District Court on Wednesday last week, the government’s representatives called for the lawsuit to be dismissed. The government is expected to argue the procedure was legal at the time, increasing attention on a law that remained in force for nearly five decades and was only taken off the books in 1996.
As Japan dealt with the shock of surrender in World War II, some politicians spoke about an urgent need to “improve the quality of our nation.”
“The object of this law is to prevent birth of inferior descendants from the standpoint of eugenic protection and to protect the life and health of the mother as well,” the first line of the law said.
The law targeted people who were deemed to have a hereditary mental illness or “hereditary mental retardation.”
A later amendment cleared the way for the inclusion of people with non-hereditary conditions.
Michiko said the fact the law was ever in force is “shameful” and “an embarrassment for Japan.”
“That law basically was saying that there are people who should have children and people who shouldn’t have children,” she said. “It was basically designed to eliminate people with disabilities from society.”
Between 1948 and 1996, about 25,000 people were sterilized under the law, including 16,500 who did not consent to the procedure. The youngest known patients were just nine or 10 years old. About 70 percent of the cases involved women or girls.
Yasutaka Ichinokawa, a sociology professor at the University of Tokyo, said that psychiatrists identified patients whom they thought needed sterilization.
Carers at nursing homes for people with intellectual disabilities also had sterilization initiatives. Outside such institutions, the key people were local welfare officers known as minsei-iin.
“All of them worked with goodwill, and they thought sterilizations were for the interests of the people for whom they cared, but today we must see this as a violation of the reproductive rights of people with disabilities,” Ichinokawa said.
After peaking at 1,362 cases in a single year in the mid-1950s, the figures began to decline in tandem with a shift in public attitudes.
In 1972, the government triggered protests by proposing an amendment to the Eugenic Protection Law to allow pregnant women with disabled fetuses to have induced abortions.
“In response to this, disability rights advocates, mainly people with cerebral palsy, protested and lobbied to prevent the bill from passing the Diet,” said Yoko Matsubara, a bioethics professor at Ritsumeikan University.
“They claimed that the Eugenic Protection Law was similar to the Nazi sterilization. This heavily tarnished the public image of ‘eugenics,’” Matsubara said.
Then in 1984, a scandal over the fatal beating of two patients at a private mental hospital in Tochigi Prefecture, north of Tokyo, triggered international scrutiny of Japanese care practices. The number of cases declined to fewer than five a year in the late 1980s.
Although the forced sterilization provisions were finally abolished in 1996, some believe the discriminatory attitudes behind the law still linger in parts of Japanese society.
In July 2016, 19 people were stabbed to death at a home for people with disabilities in Sagamihara, southwest of Tokyo. The former employee charged with carrying out the massacre had previously written about dreaming of a world where people with disabilities could be euthanized.
“This incident was a tremendous shock to Japanese people, especially people with disabilities and their families,” Matsubara said. “It was a wake-up call for us to recognize that stigmatization of disability is still with us.”
Japan has faced several requests from UN bodies to deal with this dark chapter in its history. The most recent warning came from the UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, which called on the government in March 2016 to help victims access legal remedies, compensation and rehabilitative services.
Forced sterilization is a violation of women’s human rights “and in some cases may amount to torture,” committee Chair Dalia Leinarte said.
While the government has previously argued the procedures were carried out in line with the parliament-backed law of the land, there have recently been tentative signs of possible movement.
Last month, Kyodo News reported that the government was planning to work with regional authorities on a fact-minding mission that could pave the way for potential compensation in the future. Parliamentarians have also formed a non-partisan group to look at redress.
There would be precedent for a public apology. In 2001, then-Japanese prime minister Junichiro Koizumi apologized for decades of mistreatment of leprosy patients, who were banished to remote islands and in many cases were also sterilized.
Matsubara said the central government should take the problem seriously and “bears a heavy responsibility for having caused human rights violations of people with disabilities.”
The pressure for action will continue to grow as more victims find their voice.
In a lecture hall at the Tohoku Gakuin University in Sendai, victims speak to about 50 people about their experiences.
Iizuka is there. It took her many years to muster the courage to talk openly about her forced sterilization, but eventually she came to the realization it was important to speak up.
“I want everybody to know the truth about what happened,” she told the group. “What I really want is for the government to apologize and give compensation to all those who have suffered.”
* Names have been changed to protect privacy.
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Last week, Nvidia chief executive officer Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) unveiled the location of Nvidia’s new Taipei headquarters and announced plans to build the world’s first large-scale artificial intelligence (AI) supercomputer in Taiwan. In Taipei, Huang’s announcement was welcomed as a milestone for Taiwan’s tech industry. However, beneath the excitement lies a significant question: Can Taiwan’s electricity infrastructure, especially its renewable energy supply, keep up with growing demand from AI chipmaking? Despite its leadership in digital hardware, Taiwan lags behind in renewable energy adoption. Moreover, the electricity grid is already experiencing supply shortages. As Taiwan’s role in AI manufacturing expands, it is critical that
RSS