The Kaohsiung District Prosecutors’ Office has concluded its investigation into the minesweeper procurement case that caused a scandal last year, and has indicted the chairman and senior executives of Ching Fu Shipbuilding Co.
However, the public servants involved in the case have emerged unscathed, as have personnel at First Commercial Bank, which headed the consortium that provided a joint loan to Ching Fu. The outcome shows the difficulty of punishing anyone for malpractice within companies under the legal frame.
Amendments made to the Criminal Code on July 1, 2006, narrowed the definition of “public servant.” Only those who handle procurement operations in accordance with the Government Procurement Act (政府採購法) belong to the category that the latter part of the Criminal Code’s Article 10, Paragraph 2, Subparagraph 1 describes as authorized public servants who are empowered with legal function and power, serve in an organization of the state or a local autonomous body and are engaged in public affairs in accordance with law.
First Commercial Bank is considered a government-run company, so its personnel are definitely not public servants, according to the Criminal Code.
Consequently, even if there was malpractice involved in their loan provision, it would not constitute the offense of profiteering, for which the Anti-Corruption Act (貪污治罪條例) prescribes a penalty of not less than five years imprisonment.
However, the Banking Act’s (銀行法) Article 125-2, Paragraph 1 stipulates that a responsible person or staff member of a bank who violates their duty and damages the bank’s assets or other interests may be punished by imprisonment of between three and 10 years and those who, by such actions, gain unlawful income of at least NT$100 million (US$3.4 million) may be imprisoned for seven years.
Paragraph 2 further stipulates that when two or more staff members jointly commit such offenses, their punishment may be increased by up to one-half.
Even if this case cannot be dealt with in terms of offenses listed under the Anti-Corruption Act, if it were pursued as a special breach of trust under the Banking Act, those responsible would not be lightly punished.
Ching Fu applied for the joint loan arranged by First Commercial Bank based on its tender contract for building the minesweepers, but as the shipbuilding deal involved national secrets, the bank could only trust the state’s endorsement and guarantees. This makes it questionable whether the auditing and decisions made by the bank were a dereliction of duty.
Furthermore, the offense of special breach of trust must involve the intent to gain illegal benefit for a private person or persons, or to damage the company’s interests. Even if there were numerous faults in the internal procedure for extending the credit, it would simply be a matter of negligence, and therefore unlikely to constitute the subjective elements of special breach of trust.
Based on the principle that when in doubt a court must rule in favor of the accused, regarding the case of the First Commercial Bank loan and the laxity of the bank’s internal control system, it is only possible to pursue the administrative and civil liability of those involved.
The minesweeper case shows that although the criminal penalties for financial crimes are not much lighter than those for corruption by public servants, that the constituent elements required to constitute such crimes tend to be rather strict — from both the legislative or judicial perspectives — makes it more difficult to obtain a conviction.
Wu Ching-chin is an associate professor in Aletheia University’s Department of Law.
Translated by Julian Clegg
The bird flu outbreak at US dairy farms keeps finding alarming new ways to surprise scientists. Last week, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) confirmed that H5N1 is spreading not just from birds to herds, but among cows. Meanwhile, media reports say that an unknown number of cows are asymptomatic. Although the risk to humans is still low, it is clear that far more work needs to be done to get a handle on the reach of the virus and how it is being transmitted. That would require the USDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to get
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
On April 11, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida delivered a speech at a joint meeting of the US Congress in Washington, in which he said that “China’s current external stance and military actions present an unprecedented and the greatest strategic challenge … to the peace and stability of the international community.” Kishida emphasized Japan’s role as “the US’ closest ally.” “The international order that the US worked for generations to build is facing new challenges,” Kishida said. “I understand it is a heavy burden to carry such hopes on your shoulders,” he said. “Japan is already standing shoulder to shoulder
Former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) used to push for reforms to protect Taiwan by adopting the “three noes” policy as well as “Taiwanization.” Later, then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) wished to save the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) by pushing for the party’s “localization,” hoping to compete with homegrown political parties as a pro-Taiwan KMT. However, the present-day members of the KMT do not know what they are talking about, and do not heed the two former presidents’ words, so the party has suffered a third consecutive defeat in the January presidential election. Soon after gaining power with the help of the KMT’s