As a self-described straight crocodile hunter from the country’s rugged and socially conservative far north, Australian lawmaker Warren Entsch does not fit many people’s mold of a gay rights activist.
However, if results of a nationwide postal survey this week reveal that most Australians want same-sex marriage legalized, it is Entsch — from the country’s leading conservative party, no less — who plans to introduce legislation that could make it a reality as soon as next month.
Entsch, 67, emerged as an unlikely champion for gay rights back in 2004, when he complained that the government had amended federal laws to make clear that marriage exists only between a man and a woman.
He was the only lawmaker from his conservative Liberal Party or the center-left opposition Labor Party to speak out, earning him the moniker “progressive redneck” from bemused media outlets.
“I got literally thousands and thousands of communiques, not from the gays, but from the broader community — family, friends and relatives of gays — saying that if a healthy heterosexual, far north Queensland crocodile-farming, bull-catching Liberal can speak out on behalf of my gay friend or relative, we want to come out too,” Entsch said.
Gay rights advocates say Entsch’s championing of the issue was instrumental in getting Australia to change about 100 federal laws almost a decade ago.
Under the changes, gay couples in long-term relationships were treated the same as married couples on issues such as taxation, pensions and welfare payments.
However, removing discrimination against gays from the Marriage Act remained a step too far for most lawmakers.
Rodney Croome, a veteran gay rights campaigner, said no lawmaker deserves more credit than Entsch for pushing the issue — even though Australian Parliament now has several openly gay lawmakers.
“A key to Warren’s success is that he’s an unlikely champion,” Croome said. “It’s meant that his fellow Liberals are less able to dismiss him as having a personal interest in it and it effectively means that they have to think of the principles involved.”
However, Entsch has not managed to win over much of his own party, which has long opposed same-sex marriage.
Fellow Liberal lawmaker Craig Kelly, a vocal same-sex marriage opponent, sees Entsch as a political maverick.
“We don’t want to make jokes about our far north Queensland cousins, but often they’re an unusual bunch,” Kelly said.
Entsch said his interest in gay rights was sparked by an Outback ranch cook he knew in the 1970s who moved to Sydney for gender reassignment surgery and became a female doctor.
Entsch retired from politics in 2007, but returned for 2010 elections, where he unseated the Labor Party candidate.
“Everybody told me I was taking a risk up here. It’s a place full of rednecks,” he said, referring to his 149,000km2 electoral district, which extends from the city of Cairns, where he lives, north to islands off Papua New Guinea.
“I don’t do it for politics. I do it because it’s right,” he said.
In 2015, then-Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott, a same-sex marriage opponent, committed his conservative government to holding a compulsory nationwide vote to decide whether the unions should be legal.
He was replaced weeks later by Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, who supports marriage equality and opposed the public vote, but eventually agreed to it in a deal with party powerbrokers.
However, Australian Senate refused to fund a compulsory vote, so the government opted for a voluntary postal ballot.
Critics say it is unlikely to accurately reflect public opinion.
Almost 79 percent of more than 16 million Australian voters posted ballots before the two-month survey closed.
The result is to be announced tomorrow.
If a majority calls for marriage equality, Parliament would vote on a bill in the final two-week session of the year.
Passage is by no means certain even if a vote goes ahead.
Kelly said he would vote against it in Parliament if a majority of responses in his outer-Sydney electoral division opposed reform.
Other opponents have said they would vote against legalizing gay marriage in Parliament regardless of the survey result.
The UN Human Rights Committee on Friday criticized Australia for putting gays and lesbians “through an unnecessary and divisive public opinion poll.”
The committee called on Australia to legislate for marriage equality regardless of the survey’s outcome.
A survey commissioned by Sydney University’s US Studies Center and published on Thursday found support for gay marriage was stronger in Australia than in the US, where it has been legal since 2015.
The poll by survey company YouGov found 60 percent of Australians support same-sex marriage, 32 percent oppose it and 8 percent were undecided.
In the US, 48 percent of respondents supported marriage equality, 40 percent oppose it and 12 percent were undecided.
The online survey of 1,009 Australians and 1,107 Americans late last month has a 3 percentage point margin of error.
Entsch called the A$122 million (US$94 million) being spent on the survey an “appalling waste of money.”
He and most gay rights advocates wanted Parliament to vote on legislation straight away.
Entsch said with opinion polls in recent years showing most Australians support gay marriage, no one should accept the result of the postal survey if the answer is “No.”
“If the answer is ‘No,’ we need to analyze it, because I believe it would be flawed,” he said.
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
Liberals have wasted no time in pointing to Karol Nawrocki’s lack of qualifications for his new job as president of Poland. He has never previously held political office. He won by the narrowest of margins, with 50.9 percent of the vote. However, Nawrocki possesses the one qualification that many national populists value above all other: a taste for physical strength laced with violence. Nawrocki is a former boxer who still likes to go a few rounds. He is also such an enthusiastic soccer supporter that he reportedly got the logos of his two favorite teams — Chelsea and Lechia Gdansk —
RSS