It is fair to say that among those dependent on public transport, buses do not have a good reputation for turning up on time. So when a model for a sci-fi-looking “straddling bus” capable of gliding over traffic was unveiled in China in May (six years after first being mooted), we can safely say that the hopes of city commuters were, no pun intended, raised.
However, in the case of the so-called Transit Explore Bus (TEB), it seems that potential delays are the least of its troubles. Just one week after a “road test” of the futuristic bus — which, in the words of the Shanghaiist, proved: “They built it. They actually built it” — reports have emerged in the Chinese media suggesting that not only is the bus’ current manifestation completely unfeasible, but that the TEB might even be some kind of elaborate Ponzi scheme.
Such allegations have been indignantly rejected by the designer, Song Youzhou (宋有洲), who told the Web site Sixth Tone: “We haven’t done anything wrong at all. The latest tests show that the bus design is entirely possible.”
BUS ON STILTS
Leaving such murkier allegations aside, the ever-growing list of technical criticisms leveled at the project might seem enough to make Song and his team give up on their radical bus-on-stilts dream.
Perhaps the most cutting criticism of all: Since the TEB runs on tracks, it is technically not even a bus. It is a train.
Even the “road test,” in hindsight, was found by local media to be unconvincing. It took place on a 300m highway and was hardly equivalent to actual traffic conditions.
Was the test just a chance to show that the TEB had actually built something? Anything? Playing it down since, the authorities in Qinhuangdao, where the bus was tested, have said the TEB will just be used for tourism rather than major transportation.
As the likelihood of the TEB coming to fruition in any meaningful way crumbles, descending from transport-solution-of-the-future to a folly evocative of that episode of The Simpsons when Springfield gets a monorail, it looks set to join the ranks of other well meaning, but ultimately futile, urban traffic-solving ideas.
Like, for example, the Hyperloop (emphasis on the “hype”), in which pods full of people would in theory be fired down a large tube at speeds of up to 750mph.
The concept was first put forward by Elon Musk — the guy behind commercial space travel enterprise SpaceX — in 2013, and since then two companies have been competing to make it a reality: Hyperloop Transportation Technologies (HTT) and Hyperloop One.
Recently, Hyperloop One put on a demonstration in the Nevada desert, shooting a test sled down a track at 115mph.
HARDLY REVOLUTIONARY
However, as Guardian tech reporter Alex Hern said, while it did represent a step forward, it is a small one.
“Linear accelerators are nothing new: They’ve been used in rollercoasters for 20 years and slower versions are already used in metro systems all over the world,” Hern wrote.
So, nothing revolutionary just yet.
If it does come to fruition, it will mean people could travel from San Francisco to Los Angeles in just 30 minutes, but — as with commercial space travel — it is still unclear how the project could be economically viable with so many design and development kinks still to be hammered out.
Then there is SkyTran, a “patented, high-speed, low-cost, elevated Personal Rapid Transportation system” based in NASA’s Ames Research Center in California. SkyTran’s design consists of sleek steel and aluminum pods (what is it with pods and the future?) that travel along an elevated maglev track high above the street.
This rapid transit system, developed by NASA engineer Doug Malewicki, would carry two or four people in each pod, with the potential to move them at speeds of up to 155mph. In the case of SkyTran, the argument is that it is far more economical than building an underground system; the company claims it will cost just US$13 million for every mile (1.609km) of track, compared with US$160m per mile of subway.
Still, it is yet to appear in a city. It was due to launch in Tel Aviv in 2014, and then at the end of last year. Now the official line is that a demonstration track will be completed at the end of this year. More recently it was announced that Lagos, Nigeria, would get a SkyTran track by 2020. Fingers crossed.
Keeping in mind that most of these suggestions have barely existed beyond the drawing board, perhaps the best new public transport concept to be presented in recent years is the “cat bus,” which appears as a character in the Japanese animated fantasy film My Neighbor Totoro.
The cat bus can fly, it can take passengers to any destination they want — and, well, it is adorable. And judging by the track record of some other urban transportation ideas doing the rounds, it is also just as likely to happen.
Within Taiwan’s education system exists a long-standing and deep-rooted culture of falsification. In the past month, a large number of “ghost signatures” — signatures using the names of deceased people — appeared on recall petitions submitted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) against Democratic Progressive Party legislators Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤) and Wu Pei-yi (吳沛憶). An investigation revealed a high degree of overlap between the deceased signatories and the KMT’s membership roster. It also showed that documents had been forged. However, that culture of cheating and fabrication did not just appear out of thin air — it is linked to the
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
Taiwan People’s Party Legislator-at-large Liu Shu-pin (劉書彬) asked Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) a question on Tuesday last week about President William Lai’s (賴清德) decision in March to officially define the People’s Republic of China (PRC), as governed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as a foreign hostile force. Liu objected to Lai’s decision on two grounds. First, procedurally, suggesting that Lai did not have the right to unilaterally make that decision, and that Cho should have consulted with the Executive Yuan before he endorsed it. Second, Liu objected over national security concerns, saying that the CCP and Chinese President Xi
China’s partnership with Pakistan has long served as a key instrument in Beijing’s efforts to unsettle India. While official narratives frame the two nations’ alliance as one of economic cooperation and regional stability, the underlying strategy suggests a deliberate attempt to check India’s rise through military, economic and diplomatic maneuvering. China’s growing influence in Pakistan is deeply intertwined with its own global ambitions. The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a flagship project of the Belt and Road Initiative, offers China direct access to the Arabian Sea, bypassing potentially vulnerable trade routes. For Pakistan, these investments provide critical infrastructure, yet they also
RSS