Legislative Speaker Su Jia-chyuan (蘇嘉全) led a delegation of legislators to Japan earlier this month, making a welcome contribution to foreign relations. However, the activities of certain legislators on the visit have drawn accusations that they blurred the line between public and private spheres.
Such transgressions are commonplace in Taiwan and are even perfectly normal in many people’s eyes. If the criticisms lead people to reflect on this phenomenon and seek improvements, that would be a good thing.
Human progress aims to pursue and protect individual rights and freedoms, but individuals are members of society and must follow the basic social rule of not infringing on the rights and freedoms of others. However, in real life Taiwanese often fail to separate public and private affairs, even allowing their private interests to detract from the public good.
It is so common for politicians to misuse government money or use public projects for private profit that people might think nothing of it. It is hardly newsworthy if somebody calls an ambulance when they could make their own way to hospital, or if people trekking in the mountains use rescue helicopters as a quick way to get back down.
Pedestrian crossings seem to be just for decoration, while people ride scooters and bicycles in the wrong direction or along the sidewalk. Drivers do not like giving way when they turn left — they would rather speed up to get through first. When drivers park illegally at the side of the road or at bus stops, they blame a lack of parking spaces.
People who live on the top floor of older apartment blocks occupy the roof space for themselves, while those on the ground floor treat the basement as their own. In newer blocks, it is common for residents to build balcony extensions.
Being rowdy or having loud telephone conversations on public transport, polluting the air by burning ghost money and filling the neighborhood with cooking smells are other common selfish acts.
Taiwanese have not always been so unruly. The generation who grew up under Japanese rule received an education that stressed moral cultivation. They learned not to spit and urinate in random places and to maintain good hygiene and a smart appearance. They got into the habit of being quiet and polite instead of rowdy, and of being considerate instead of causing trouble.
This kind of education fostered self-discipline and personal cultivation, and it shows itself in the social civility that is characteristic of that generation.
Unfortunately, the Chinese culture that took over in the post-World War II years paid scant heed to this basic training. Learning for life gave way to the pursuit of qualifications and further education. Later on, the generations who did not receive adequate education for life have themselves become parents and teachers, so their attitudes of putting oneself first and ignoring the needs of others have become ever more widespread. As a result, Taiwanese still lag behind more advanced societies in terms of civility.
Some encouraging developments have been seen in recent years, such as not eating or drinking in mass rapid transit systems, standing to one side on escalators and not grabbing priority seats. These courtesies are at least a good beginning.
If Taiwan is to become a truly civilized society, people must learn to exercise self-discipline and draw a clear line between public and private affairs. Some Japanese-educated people are still with us as role models. However, as that generation fades into history, people will have to think for themselves about how to make things better.
Lu Shih-hsiang is an adviser to the Taipei Times.
Translated by Julian Clegg
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
RSS