The Executive Yuan’s publication of information about areas susceptible to soil liquefaction has come as a bombshell for Taiwan’s usually quiet society. The revelations have thrown a lot of people into a state of worry and confusion.
Cabinet spokesperson Sun Lih-chyun (孫立群) said that there is no reason to panic, as the government has drawn up a full set of complementary measures.
However, the online database and a telephone hotline have been overloaded with inquiries, showing just how anxious people are.
Why were the authorities in such a rush to release the data, which are important enough to have an impact on social stability, at this key moment when the outgoing government is preparing to transfer power to an incoming one and social stability should be a priority? It really has been done in too much of a rush.
The Executive Yuan said that the data on soil liquefaction is only “preliminary.” Although the data are very rough, consisting of maps with simply defined “red areas,” they have been enough to throw the public into turmoil, while the real-estate, mortgage and insurance markets have been unsettled. The atmosphere of anxiety is undoubtedly making things worse for Taiwan’s stagnant economy.
The Executive Yuan said that the government has a complete set of complementary measures already in place, but the measures all require the cooperation of the legislature and local governments. At present, just as government authority is being handed over and the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) “blue sky” is giving way to the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) “green earth,” to what extent is this caretaker Cabinet actually capable of implementing the measures? Everyone knows the answer to that question.
A caretaker Cabinet should focus on maintaining stability. It should be obvious to anyone that releasing such crucial data that involves complementary measures would stir up trouble.
Has the transitional Cabinet not overstepped its remit by making such a move?
The Executive Yuan is trying to put out the flames by offering policy benefits.
It said that the government is to contribute NT$24 billion (US$738 million) over the next six years to pay for “health checks” for old buildings and to fund measures to prevent or reduce soil liquefaction.
However, the announcement also goes beyond the role of a caretaker Cabinet.
Common sense tells that announcing which areas are susceptible to soil liquefaction was bound to have a tremendous negative impact on social stability, as well as on business growth and economic activity.
Did the Executive Yuan instruct the National Development Council to carry out a regulatory impact analysis beforehand, or to propose risk mitigation countermeasures to deal with the negative consequences that it might have? Evidently not. The complementary measures that people are hearing about are media versions of the “official line.”
What needs to be done next? Local governments have no idea, and the public has even less of a clue.
According to Construction and Planning Agency figures, more than 3.68 million households in Taiwan live in buildings that are more than 30 years old. These older buildings are mainly concentrated in the six special municipalities, with at least 450,000 such households in Taipei. What is to be done with these older buildings? Surely that is the most urgent question.
However, while the central government is trumpeting its policies, local governments have not even drawn up budgets to deal with the issue and potential contractors are even less prepared to handle it.
People can only hope that the incoming government would quickly pick up the reins and deal with the issue, rather than just putting it off and hoping for the best.
Ted Chiou is a professor in the Department of Social and Policy Sciences at Yuan Ze University.
Translated by Julian Clegg
After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats. Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold. The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with
Taiwan’s undersea cables connecting it to the world were allegedly severed several times by a Chinese ship registered under a flag of convenience. As the vessel sailed, it used several different automatic identification systems (AIS) to create fake routes. That type of “shadow fleet” and “gray zone” tactics could create a security crisis in Taiwan and warrants response measures. The concept of a shadow fleet originates from the research of Elisabeth Braw, senior fellow at the Washington-based Atlantic Council. The phenomenon was initiated by authoritarian countries such as Iran, North Korea and Russia, which have been hit by international economic