The Executive Yuan’s publication of information about areas susceptible to soil liquefaction has come as a bombshell for Taiwan’s usually quiet society. The revelations have thrown a lot of people into a state of worry and confusion.
Cabinet spokesperson Sun Lih-chyun (孫立群) said that there is no reason to panic, as the government has drawn up a full set of complementary measures.
However, the online database and a telephone hotline have been overloaded with inquiries, showing just how anxious people are.
Why were the authorities in such a rush to release the data, which are important enough to have an impact on social stability, at this key moment when the outgoing government is preparing to transfer power to an incoming one and social stability should be a priority? It really has been done in too much of a rush.
The Executive Yuan said that the data on soil liquefaction is only “preliminary.” Although the data are very rough, consisting of maps with simply defined “red areas,” they have been enough to throw the public into turmoil, while the real-estate, mortgage and insurance markets have been unsettled. The atmosphere of anxiety is undoubtedly making things worse for Taiwan’s stagnant economy.
The Executive Yuan said that the government has a complete set of complementary measures already in place, but the measures all require the cooperation of the legislature and local governments. At present, just as government authority is being handed over and the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) “blue sky” is giving way to the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) “green earth,” to what extent is this caretaker Cabinet actually capable of implementing the measures? Everyone knows the answer to that question.
A caretaker Cabinet should focus on maintaining stability. It should be obvious to anyone that releasing such crucial data that involves complementary measures would stir up trouble.
Has the transitional Cabinet not overstepped its remit by making such a move?
The Executive Yuan is trying to put out the flames by offering policy benefits.
It said that the government is to contribute NT$24 billion (US$738 million) over the next six years to pay for “health checks” for old buildings and to fund measures to prevent or reduce soil liquefaction.
However, the announcement also goes beyond the role of a caretaker Cabinet.
Common sense tells that announcing which areas are susceptible to soil liquefaction was bound to have a tremendous negative impact on social stability, as well as on business growth and economic activity.
Did the Executive Yuan instruct the National Development Council to carry out a regulatory impact analysis beforehand, or to propose risk mitigation countermeasures to deal with the negative consequences that it might have? Evidently not. The complementary measures that people are hearing about are media versions of the “official line.”
What needs to be done next? Local governments have no idea, and the public has even less of a clue.
According to Construction and Planning Agency figures, more than 3.68 million households in Taiwan live in buildings that are more than 30 years old. These older buildings are mainly concentrated in the six special municipalities, with at least 450,000 such households in Taipei. What is to be done with these older buildings? Surely that is the most urgent question.
However, while the central government is trumpeting its policies, local governments have not even drawn up budgets to deal with the issue and potential contractors are even less prepared to handle it.
People can only hope that the incoming government would quickly pick up the reins and deal with the issue, rather than just putting it off and hoping for the best.
Ted Chiou is a professor in the Department of Social and Policy Sciences at Yuan Ze University.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big
RSS