In 2000, when the world adopted the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), a promise was made: Education is a right and every child must be educated. This years Oslo Summit on Education for Development confirmed the growing consensus within the global education community about what must be done to honor that pledge.
Norwegian Prime Minister Erna Solberg and Foreign Minister Borge Brende are to be congratulated. They not only helped to turbocharge the discussion, but also — and more importantly — helped to forge policymakers’ resolve to find the resources that are required to get the job done under the upcoming Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs, which are to succeed the MDGs).
Indeed, the first achievement of the Oslo summit was a call to get much more serious about closing the US$39 billion annual gap in external funding needed to ensure that every child attends pre-primary, primary and secondary school. This is the bedrock of the proposed SDG to “ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote life-long learning opportunities for all.”
At the meeting’s close, Norway announced the establishment of a Commission on Financing Global Education Opportunities. The new commission, convened by Norway, Indonesia, Chile and Malawi, and headed by former UK prime minister Gordon Brown, is to make the case for investment in education and reversal of the decline in overall funding. This gives education the same opportunity that the health sector had following the adoption of the MDGs.
At that time, the world secured the donor funding and introduced the innovating finance mechanisms that enabled widespread vaccine distribution and led to better ways to combat HIV, malaria and other diseases. Today, we need to unlock the same doors to ensure that governments, philanthropists, the private sector and others step up to meet the world’s education needs.
The Oslo meeting also advanced work that is already underway to establish a cohesive response to the education crisis afflicting tens of millions of children caught up in war, civil strife, epidemics and natural disasters. Children across Asia, the Middle East and Africa have been driven out of school — many for years — compounding their misery and jeopardizing their futures. The aim under the emerging approach is to have a new program that responds to these children’s needs ready to start next year.
The Oslo meeting also affirmed new horizons. No one spoke more eloquently than Pakistani schoolgirl and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Malala Yousufzai. Her appeal for 12 years of quality primary and secondary education for all children electrified the meeting’s participants. “If nine years of education is not enough for your children, then it is not enough for the rest of the world’s children,” she declared. “The world needs to think bigger and it needs to dream bigger.”
And so we shall. As world leaders head to Addis Ababa this week for the Third International Conference on Financing for Development, they are to be guided not only by what happened in Oslo, but also by other important recent markers of global sentiment. For example, education has been endorsed repeatedly as the highest development priority in UN My World Surveys. Likewise, in May, the Incheon Declaration of the World Education Forum endorsed quality education for all and called for the Global Partnership for Education (GPE) to be scaled up and strengthened.
The draft outcome document for the upcoming conference in Addis Ababa reflects the rapidly emerging consensus:
“We will scale up investments and international cooperation to allow all children to complete free, equitable, inclusive and quality early childhood, primary and secondary education, including through scaling up and strengthening initiatives, such as the Global Partnership for Education.”
So what needs to be done in Addis Ababa — and beyond — to take this agenda forward?
For starters, it is essential that advocacy efforts to ensure better resourcing of the current GPE model continue, accompanied by a strategy to attract new donor governments and new private-sector and philanthropic engagement. Moreover, there is a critical need to design innovative financing solutions that work at scale, as well as to ensure better donor coordination, while efforts within developing countries to create functioning taxation systems and transparent government accounting must be better coordinated with efforts to improve domestic resource mobilization.
Last but not least, it is essential to identify and agree on the best approach to meeting the educational needs of children in crisis and conflict.
As with the MDGs’ success in achieving its health targets, ensuring the capacity to meet the world’s educational needs requires exploring seed financing and then upscaling, after appropriate due diligence and new ways of working. Much can be done to create global goods platforms for educational inputs like books, technology, professional support materials for teachers and student learning assessment mechanisms. By bringing to bear the efficiencies that come with scale, such an approach promises to support country-led education planning and implementation.
The GPE’s members — 60 developing-country partners, donor countries, civil-society organizations, teachers associations, private-sector actors and others, including UN agencies — are all ready to realize the SDG vision. Those most committed to these goals know that this is the time, this is our fight, this is what we must do for our children throughout the world.
Julia Gillard, former Australian prime minister, is chair of the Global Partnership for Education.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS