In Transparency International’s 2013 Global Corruption Barometer, indices of perceived corruption in Taiwan turned out to be among the highest among the sampled countries. The government responded immediately, saying that there must be something wrong with the unit that carried out the research and with the published data, and it instructed its diplomatic missions to immediately protest to Transparency International.
Let us set aside for the moment controversies and questions regarding the survey, and consider the matter purely with regard to the present reality in Taiwan.
Over the past two years, the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), which likes to present an image of clean government, has been embarrassed by implication in serious cases of corruption involving former Executive Yuan secretary-general Lin Yi-shih (林益世) and former Taipei City councilor Lai Su-ju (賴素如), who was also director of Ma’s office as chairman of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). To make matters worse, five legislators have been convicted of election-related corruption. These cases suggest that corruption in Taiwan is going from bad to worse.
Corruption has been around for a long time. It results from a poorly structured system and a malignant political subculture, but up till now no government has managed to effectively resolve this problem.
With regard to institutional and structural problems, the legislative and executive branches of the government have consistently failed to establish effective laws and systems for eliminating corruption. Three “sunshine laws” were drawn up for enactment a full decade ago, but they have been put on hold because of obstruction and distortion by entrenched interests — notably top policymakers in the KMT.
Even though the Act on Property Declaration by Public Servants (公職人員財產申報法) has been on the books for 20 years, it has hardly any effect at all. Hong Kwo-shing (洪國興), former director of the Control Yuan’s Department of Asset-Declaration by Public Functionaries, said that although about 60,000 civil servants declare their assets each year, adding up to nearly a million such declarations over the past 20 years, not a single corruption case has been uncovered as a result. Evidently this act, the first of the “sunshine laws,” has not cast any light on the shady world of corruption. The Political Donations Act (政治獻金法) has been just as ineffective.
All in all, those in power are neither willing nor able to establish an effective system for eliminating corruption, and this is the main reason it has not been possible to root out the problem.
This political subculture of corruption has been creeping and growing for a long time, flourishing in the judiciary, police force and educational establishment. The frightening thing is that this mafia-like subculture of corruption has come to be an integral part of Taiwan’s party and government systems. Lin and Lai are typical examples.
Lin was a legislator for 10 years, and he long ago wormed his way into the KMT’s power center. Over time, corruption became a habitual thing for Lin, but he is by no means the only one. Lai’s case is a little different, since she got her hands on power from the highest authorities suddenly, but she, too, quickly became entangled in a web of corruption.
Entanglement in corruption, and even devotion to it, happens all over the place. Transparency International’s finding that Taiwanese perceive the legislature and political parties to be seriously corrupt proves the existence of this malignant subculture of corruption in our country.
Chiu Hei-yuan is a research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of Sociology.
Translated by Julian Clegg
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization