Not long after Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) took office he gave an interview to Shih Chih-yu (石之瑜), a former colleague in National Taiwan University’s political science department, in which he advocated what he calls “Confucian democracy.”
Simply put, Confucian democracy does not emphasize the checks and balances that one expects to see in a democratic system, but rather stresses the concept of “harmony.”
Yet harmony is a value the centralized Chinese Communist Party regime is often heard praising. This could be read as a sign that Jiang and President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) intend to handle relations between Taiwan and China by forcible and undemocratic means.
If we take a closer look at what Confucianism represents, we find that its favored political ethos is one in which a wise ruler is assisted by able and virtuous ministers.
In the context of thousands of years of imperial Chinese history, this ethical outlook formed the basis for the kind of fawning culture that prevailed in the imperial palace.
The culture of fawning could be seen from the palace etiquette in which most court officials were forever bowing to one another, and from the letters, documents and everyday language of the court, in which officials referred to the emperor as wise and saintly, while demeaning themselves as “unworthy ministers” or “slaves.”
The government structure was set up such that “able and virtuous ministers,” who were senior to everyone except the emperor, fawned upon the supreme ruler and were in turn fawned upon by their subordinates.
Generally speaking, grovelling to one’s superiors was the main way for court officials to stay in favor, while less consideration was given to the expertise needed to carry out their duties effectively.
Besides this culture of fawning, the entire Confucian political system was controlled by a scholarly elite whose main feature was that they saw ordinary people as “the governed,” needing to be governed because they were incapable of governing themselves.
The whole system was designed in such a way as to put ordinary people at the receiving end of officials’ instructions and decisions.
It was very far removed from the notion of popular sovereignty that is fundamental to democracy.
The cross-strait service trade agreement that was signed on June 21 was set up and negotiated behind closed doors by Ma and Jiang’s administration, and Ma’s team of advisors seems thoroughly pleased and complacent about the outcome.
This is a perfect embodiment of the Confucian political culture that prevailed in imperial China.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators originally played along with the government, intending to give it carte blanche to implement the agreement. Only under pressure from various civic groups, have they been put on guard and agreed to vote on the terms of the new agreement item by item, instead of in one package.
However, Jiang immediately called an inter-ministerial meeting, insisting that there was nothing wrong with his policies. He said that he had no intention of explaining to the public how the government plans to ensure that people working in sectors impacted by the new pact can carry on with their livelihoods under conditions of economic deregulation. Meanwhile, he instructed the Council for Economic Planning and Development to explain the pact to overseas businesspeople and investors and directed the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to improve its communication with foreign diplomats.
This attitude of attaching more importance to outsiders than the lowly domestic populace is a fine example of the way that Confucian political culture makes the common people entirely the object of governance.
Hot on the heels of Jiang’s Cabinet meeting, Ma made a speech in which he talked about how “service” is one of Taiwan’s strong points.
He did not stop to reflect on all the broken pledges and failed economic measures that have marked his time in office, still less give any respect to the public’s political opinions or improve the channels for civic groups to take part in decisionmaking.
The president and premier — the wise ruler and his virtuous minister — obstinate and conceited as they are, may well be on the way to throwing Taiwan’s domestic market and social wellbeing into widespread confusion and panic.
The performance of Ma and Jiang’s government in relation to the service trade agreement proves that the Confucian democracy they espouse is really a slogan that involves loyalty to Beijing’s cultural unification strategy, along with suppression of democracy in Taiwan.
If Taiwanese allow them to gradually implement this undemocratic concept, Taiwan will be headed toward integration into China’s centralized system.
This is the road to ruin.
Chu Ping-tzu is an associate professor of Chinese literature at National Tsing Hua University.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS