For the Aborigines that have lived in Taiwan for thousands of years, the celebrations for the Republic of China’s (ROC) 100th anniversary are entirely meaningless.
When the ROC was founded in China 100 years ago, the Aborigines in Taiwan were still at the beginning stages of a five-decades-long Japanese colonial rule. The Xinhai Revolution that was taking place in China across the Taiwan Strait in 1911 had absolutely no connection whatsoever with Aborigines in Taiwan.
It was not until the Japanese were defeated at the end of World War II and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) took over Taiwan that Taiwan’s Aborigines, for the first time, came into contact with the ROC. As far as the Aborigines were concerned, the ROC government was just one more colonizer forcing them to accept colonial rule, and this is precisely why some Aboriginal groups are currently staging protests to oppose the centennial celebrations, in the same way Native Americans protest the celebration of Columbus Day in mainstream US society.
However, there are also a lot of official government-sanctioned Aboriginal events to “celebrate” the ROC’s centennial. Some of these events are huge opera productions, music and dance performances, history exhibits, academic conferences and concerts — all of which basically boil down to the colonized helping the colonizer celebrate their nation’s centennial. It makes one wonder how on earth this could happen.
In his celebrated book Imagined Communities, Benedict Anderson mentions something that hits home for us in Taiwan. In 1913, when the Dutch were celebrating the 100th anniversary of their independence from French rule, the Dutch colonial government organized centennial celebrations in Batavia — present day Jakarta — the capital of the Dutch East Indies. In doing so, they required the colonized people there to participate in their celebrations and provide manpower and resources.
In an article with the title “If I were a Netherlander” that an Indonesian nationalist named Suwardi Suryaningrat published in a local newspaper, one part stood out from the rest: “If I were a Netherlander, I would not celebrate the commemoration of independence in a country where we refuse to give people their freedom.”
Now, almost 100 years later, it is just as absurd that the Aborigines of Taiwan continue to be invited to celebrate the ROC’s centennial by a colonial government and a president who says that he “treat[s] Aborigines as human beings.”
If the ROC regime on Taiwan truly adheres to their Constitution, and the nation really is as culturally diverse as it claims, then the best way to celebrate its centennial would be to start by offering a sincere apology for its mistakes, for stealing land from Aborigines and for forcing them to assimilate, which amounts to a long line of destructive colonial policies on its part. It should also work to help restore traditional Aboriginal land as well as Aboriginal languages, cultures and dignity.
Chi Chun-chieh is a professor at National Dong Hwa University’s Institute of Ethnic Relations.
Translated by Kyle Jeffcoat
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
International debate on Taiwan is obsessed with “invasion countdowns,” framing the cross-strait crisis as a matter of military timetables and political opportunity. However, the seismic political tremors surrounding Central Military Commission (CMC) vice chairman Zhang Youxia (張又俠) suggested that Washington and Taipei are watching the wrong clock. Beijing is constrained not by a lack of capability, but by an acute fear of regime-threatening military failure. The reported sidelining of Zhang — a combat veteran in a largely unbloodied force and long-time loyalist of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — followed a year of purges within the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA)
RSS