The World Economic Forum (WEF) released its Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 on Sept. 7. Taiwan’s high global competitiveness ranking remained unchanged at No. 13, outperforming both South Korea at No. 24 and China at No. 26.
According to Government Information Office (GIO) Minister Philip Yang (楊永明), the high ranking shows that the government’s policy direction is correct. This official attitude makes it abundantly clear that the administration is neither capable nor willing to review itself. The fact is that Taiwan has always been given a good ranking by the WEF and in 2005, under the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government, it ranked No. 8.
A responsible government’s first reaction to the announcement of the ranking would be to compare the ranking with reality, to see if they match. What the public needs is the fruits of a “real economy,” not just an superficially impressive ranking. Unfortunately, there seems to be a gap between Taiwan’s real economy and the high WEF ranking, and that gap is ridiculously large.
Taiwan’s stock market, a window onto the nation’s economy, has always been the weakest among all Asian countries; the unemployment rate remains the highest of the Four Asian Tigers; real salaries are not only stagnant, they have returned to the level of 13 years ago; and average GDP growth over the past three years has been the lowest among East Asian countries. In addition, it was frightening to witness the extent of this decline when the financial crisis hit Taiwan.
Why is this so? The answer can be found in another international index. According to the assessment of the Business Environment Risk Intelligence (BERI), Taiwan’s overall investment environment is the world’s third best. However, the investment rate — domestic investment as a proportion of GDP — has hovered at about 20 percent and the average over the past three years is just 20.6 percent. In contrast, South Korea, which is ranked 17th in the world, has a rate of 29 percent. Insufficient domestic investment leads to a lack of economic dynamism and the loss of jobs.
What the government should do now is review its own performance. It stands to reason that with the third-best investment environment in the world, the investment rate in Taiwan should be at least 29 percent or more. Why, then, do local businesses choose not to invest and foreign investors not to rush to invest in Taiwan? What is the fundamental cause of the gap between Taiwan and South Korea in the area of investment?
The crux of the matter is that Taiwan’s “China fever” has overheated, resulting in Taiwanese businesspeople channeling too much investment into China. Since the signing of the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA), in particular, Taiwanese investment in China had increased by 102 percent to US$12.23 billion at the end of last year.
A market estimate implies that real investment is twice the amount officially approved by the Investment Commission of the Ministry of Economic Affairs, US$24.46 billion, or the equivalent of 5.79 percent of last year’s GDP of US$430.5 billion.
Obviously, the gap between these indexes and the real economy is a result of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) pro-China policies. In other words, his administration is going in completely the wrong direction. As long as the government’s pro-China policies do not change, the real economy will continue to decline, regardless of how many top rankings we receive.
Huang Tien-lin is a former national policy adviser to the president.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Last week, Nvidia chief executive officer Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) unveiled the location of Nvidia’s new Taipei headquarters and announced plans to build the world’s first large-scale artificial intelligence (AI) supercomputer in Taiwan. In Taipei, Huang’s announcement was welcomed as a milestone for Taiwan’s tech industry. However, beneath the excitement lies a significant question: Can Taiwan’s electricity infrastructure, especially its renewable energy supply, keep up with growing demand from AI chipmaking? Despite its leadership in digital hardware, Taiwan lags behind in renewable energy adoption. Moreover, the electricity grid is already experiencing supply shortages. As Taiwan’s role in AI manufacturing expands, it is critical that