A number of scandals have hit the headlines recently, such as corruption in Department of Health-run hospitals involving doctors, health officials and businesspeople and another corruption case involving Hualien police officers who allegedly received bribes from several illegal gambling venues and video game shops. There are already ongoing investigations into these cases, carried out by the Investigation Bureau under the direction of local district prosecutors’ offices.
However, the establishment of the Agency Against Corruption (AAC) has muddied the waters somewhat, creating a degree of uncertainty as to who is responsible for investigating what, and the danger that the different agencies will end up treading on each other’s toes.
Even if the agency is restricted to investigating cases that arise after it was established, the problem is that different corruption cases are often interrelated. Consequently, different agencies working independently of each other would still find themselves working on the same cases, making it difficult to make optimal use of investigative resources.
The Ministry of Justice has indicated that it wants to delineate responsibility according to the sphere of investigation, with the agency handling internal corruption involving public servants and the bureau responsible for investigating bribery in the public sphere.
This seems a sensible approach, but creates problems of its own. For example, although the agency is to have a staff of more than 200, Item 2, Article 2 of the Organic Act For Anti-Corruption Administration (廉政署組織法) states that only members of the AAC who have judicial police powers can investigate corruption. The current incarnation of the agency is only 80-strong.
Such a small team will not only be unable to deal with the enormous workload involved in investigating all public servants, it will also be severely stretched in dealing with corruption in Department of Health hospitals and the police around the country.
Corruption is never carried out in isolation and often involves collusion, so it is by no means clear how the two spheres can be investigated in perfect isolation.
In the absence of legislation clearly stipulating how this might be done, we could well find that the two agencies, in trying to outshine each other, minding their own business and getting on with their own duties, will still end up treading on each others’ toes, creating a headache for all concerned.
Consequently, the professional powers of the agency staff need to be clarified as soon as possible, to differentiate the roles of the two agencies and make sure they work in concert rather than at cross purposes.
Wu Ching-chin is an assistant professor in the Department of Financial and Economic Law at Aletheia University.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
The recent passing of Taiwanese actress Barbie Hsu (徐熙媛), known to many as “Big S,” due to influenza-induced pneumonia at just 48 years old is a devastating reminder that the flu is not just a seasonal nuisance — it is a serious and potentially fatal illness. Hsu, a beloved actress and cultural icon who shaped the memories of many growing up in Taiwan, should not have died from a preventable disease. Yet her death is part of a larger trend that Taiwan has ignored for too long — our collective underestimation of the flu and our low uptake of the
US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with
Taiwan’s undersea cables connecting it to the world were allegedly severed several times by a Chinese ship registered under a flag of convenience. As the vessel sailed, it used several different automatic identification systems (AIS) to create fake routes. That type of “shadow fleet” and “gray zone” tactics could create a security crisis in Taiwan and warrants response measures. The concept of a shadow fleet originates from the research of Elisabeth Braw, senior fellow at the Washington-based Atlantic Council. The phenomenon was initiated by authoritarian countries such as Iran, North Korea and Russia, which have been hit by international economic