The latest export orders and industrial production figures released on Thursday show that Taiwan is gradually building momentum in export-oriented growth. Economists said a much narrower decline in export orders last month from a year ago, together with solid improvement in industrial production, suggested that domestic manufacturers are increasing production as the economy appears to bottom out.
Other data released on Wednesday show that domestic trade also posted signs of recovery in all three categories — retail, wholesale and food/restaurant services — implying that the impact of the recession has begun to ease.
The latest data are not all promising, however. The recovery in export orders, industrial production and wholesale trade last month was hurt by a weakening rebound in retail sales and food/restaurant services.
In other words, while export-reliant manufacturers — especially in consumer electronics, information technology and machinery production — may be beginning to celebrate the green shoots of recovery, domestic-oriented firms are still finding themselves struggling with weak consumer demand.
The latest data present a picture of uneven development across the nation’s economic fundamentals and cast doubt on the sustainability of any recovery. Furthermore, consumer demand, which is necessary for sustainable recovery, is likely to remain subdued now that the latest unemployment figures, released on Wednesday, show the rate continuing to climb — to a record 5.94 percent last month.
With graduates entering the labor market, the jobless rate is certain to rise further in the next few months. Although government officials have said the labor market has started to stabilize because local companies are cutting fewer jobs, the fact is that the same companies remain reluctant to increase staff.
The situation has led the government to create short-term public sector jobs for the unemployed. It has also coordinated with private businesses to provide internships for college graduates.
But these are short-term solutions for stabilizing the labor market — and there are downsides to temporary offers. Companies need to see more concrete evidence of recovery and real growth in sales before they will want to hire new people. If there is no such evidence, then they will squeeze more work from existing employees as part of cost-cutting efforts.
Another downside is the persistence of long-term unemployment if job creation remains weak — even in the event that the economy begins to recover this year. Certain age groups are more likely to suffer, especially older age brackets.
Then there is worsening youth unemployment. Data suggest that one out of every six unemployed is a first-time job seeker, and that it took about eight months for fresh graduates to secure a job last month — higher than the average of six-and-a-half months in the first half of the year.
Even graduates who are fortunate to secure temporary jobs or internships this year will face uncertainties once their contracts expire. If they cannot find a job for an extended period of time or need to obtain new skills to survive in a more difficult job market, many will believe that the extra time they have devoted to their education will have been for nothing.
It will take some years for the job market to stabilize. In the meantime, long-term unemployment poses a real challenge to the nation’s economic competitiveness — and policymakers.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS