Outsourcing to lower-cost places like India, China, Taiwan and Eastern Europe became routine for many US and western European companies over the last decade. But Porsche went to Finland.
Since 1997, Porsche, the German sports car manufacturer, has headed north to this Finnish town instead of east, which helps explain why it is still making money while so many automakers are tapping government aid to weather the worst industry downturn in a generation.
During the boom years, Valmet Automotive, which calls itself a service provider to the automotive industry, cranked out thousands of cars in Uusikaupunki to supplement Porsche’s German production. Now that the assembly lines are slowing in the face of reduced demand for costly luxury goods, Valmet, rather than Porsche, is bearing much of the burden of the industry’s distress.
“We are a lean organization, but at the end of the day, there is a threshold here,” Valmet president Ilpo Korhonen said. “We can’t run like this forever.”
Automakers universally outsource production of parts or sections of vehicles and some even contract for the assembly of small numbers of automobiles.
Porsche, the maker of the celebrated 911 two-seater and the Cayenne sport utility vehicle, has taken the idea even further. It has turned to Valmet to assemble one of its main product lines, the Cayman, and its convertible sibling, the Boxster.
This makes Porsche the only major virtual vehicle manufacturer — a company that designs and markets sports cars without actually building them all on its own production line.
So far, its system is molding well to the contours of an unforgiving world economy.
“This crisis will be the absolute test for the Porsche model,” said Juergen Pieper, co-head of research at Bankhaus Metzler in Frankfurt. “Right now, Porsche is anything but a fair-weather company.”
Like every automaker these days, Porsche has had to find ways to save money. In the first half of its current financial year, from August to January, sales tumbled 12.8 percent to 3.04 billion euros (US$4.11 billion), while deliveries fell 26.7 percent.
At the same time, it booked 6.84 billion euros in profits from the financial derivatives it used to secure control of Volkswagen.
VITAL FLANK
Porsche chief executive Wendelin Wiedeking has assured the 2,500 workers at the company’s Stuttgart plant that their jobs are safe, securing a vital flank in a country where workers are represented on company boards.
The bread and butter of Porsche’s production in Stuttgart is the classic 911, but with demand for that model falling, it is pulling Boxster production out of Uusikaupunki back to Germany.
Wiedeking has said repeatedly that it is “preferable to build one car too few than one too many.” That line of thinking allows Porsche to keep pricing its cars like the luxuries they are rather than constantly discounting them in order to work off excess inventory — a strategy that left Porsche near bankruptcy in the early 1990s.
At a time when other companies are offering strong incentives for sales in the US, Porsche is holding the line.
“You wonder if they would get sales back if they did incentives like the other luxury brands,” said Jessica Caldwell, manager of pricing and industry analysis at Edmunds.com, a research company. “But their incentives are very low.”
Wiedeking became Porsche’s chief executive in 1992 and brought with him the gospel of efficient production that openly copied methods he learned from Japanese automakers, above all Toyota. But by outsourcing assembly to Valmet, he did his Asian mentors one better.
QUALITY
The Valmet-Porsche relationship began as demand for the 911 rose, forcing Porsche to find another way to make the Boxster. Industry rumors abound that Valmet’s quality sometimes outstripped what Porsche had managed back in Stuttgart, which Korhonen does not deny.
Porsche’s customers and dealers never know the difference. Only a hidden code on the cars reveals that Finnish elbow grease buttresses German engineering. Valmet’s production is mixed into shipments from northern German ports that are bound for the US and Asia.
Valmet’s production for Porsche peaked in 2006 at about 30,000 vehicles, or roughly a third of Porsche’s total output that year. Last year, it was 17,500 vehicles, and it is likely to be far lower this year.
Korhonen, a cerebral engineer with an MBA, is constantly calibrating his work force. In each of the last three months, he idled about a third of Valmet’s 600 employees before ramping up again in January and February, and then shifting down with 190 layoffs last month.
“We are adjusting capacity almost daily,” Korhonen said.
Managing the flow of parts that go into a high-performance Porsche is also tricky. Many suppliers are concentrated near Stuttgart, but Valmet has to arrange deliveries to Finland, and often in smaller quantities.
Hence the “milk run,” as Korhonen calls it. Trucks are perpetually swinging through Germany, Poland, Sweden and Finland to collect the components that go into the Porsches assembled in Uusikaupunki, a town of 16,000 whose many inlets and islands have made it a popular spot for vacation homes.
But Valmet’s greatest challenge is, in the end, existential. Its contract with Porsche expires in 2012. The German company will move its outsourced assembly to Magna Steyr, an Austrian division of Magna International that has the resources to assist Porsche in development work.
Valmet workers are already clearing space in the factory to manufacture the Karma, a plug-in electric hybrid designed by Fisker Automotive, a California start-up. Soon, it will also produce a luxury golf cart for a Danish customer and expects to sell engineering services as automakers create derivatives of existing models, Korhonen said.
And when the well-to-do rediscover their love of Porsche sports cars, Valmet hopes to produce those, too.
“Eventually we will ramp back up,” Korhonen said. “We expect the market to recover.”
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would