Taiwan's economy and standard of living have recently become heated electioneering topics. Although the nation's per capita income has increased, it isn't reflected in the standard of living. This is the problem we must look into and resolve, and to confuse one with the other is an election ploy.
First, an M-shaped society is a global phenomenon. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (
While the gap between the rich and the poor in China and Hong Kong is wider than in Taiwan, the poverty gap has increased in the US as well.
A good example of this is soaring real estate prices in upscale neighborhoods even though more and more ordinary people cannot even afford to purchase homes. This kind of situation is also appearing in Taipei.
Second, the existence of the poverty gap has to do with resource allocation problems. It is difficult to reform the old unfair allocation system if the opposition is the majority in the legislature. What's more, most Taiwanese businesspeople are in China and do their consuming there.
Even many retired military officers, civil servants and teachers, who enjoy an 18 percent preferential interest rate, consume in China and stimulate the local economy there.
How could older people with lower incomes, low education levels and without special benefits consume enough in Taiwan to stimulate the nation's domestic economy?
Third, the fact that a great amount of domestic capital has flown to China is the most important factor contributing to Taiwan's economic problems. Policies regarding Taiwanese investment in China should be examined and amended on a yearly basis depending on the situation. Politicians cannot just make random promises about these things at liberty.
As Ma encourages Taiwanese businesspeople to go all out and invest in China without caution, the activity has become simply frantic.
Taiwan needs to attract foreign investment by liberalizing economic restrictions in a way that ensures national security.
As Hong Kong's economy and commercial markets have been increasingly Sinicized, Taiwan should make an extra effort to develop its own economy.
In the past the government used big public works and construction projects to tend to Taiwan's domestic needs, develop the economy and create more employment opportunities.
But the opposition majority in the legislature has rejected or postponed annual budgets and some economic proposals. And yet the pan-blues dare to say the government is powerless. They are very good at blaming others for their own wrongdoing.
It is clear that the pan-blue camp is not caring for Taiwan's interests, and it is the Taiwanese public that is harmed the most by the party's scorched-earth politics.
In the process of economic liberalization and globalization, the emergence of disadvantaged groups is unavoidable and the government should do its best to help them.
Taiwan's health insurance system, for example, is doing well in this respect. Proof of how good this system is, is that even Taiwanese who live in China and proclaim their loyalty to that country come back to Taiwan to see a doctor when they get ill.
In any case, there are disadvantaged groups in Taiwan that need to be better cared for by the government.
Returning the KMT's party assets to the public is a feasible way to achieve this. This money can be used for welfare for weaker groups in society.
If Ma Ying-jeou is so concerned about the state of mankind he can offer this donation to help. If he can't, he shouldn't cry crocodile tears.
Paul Lin is a political commentator in Taiwan.
Translated by Ted Yang and Anna Stiggelbout
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the
When I visited Taiwan last summer, I called on the nation to use its status as a technology superpower to build superweapons. It is obvious to me as I return a year later that Taiwan is now answering that call. By 2030, Taiwan envisions a domestic drone hub, capable of producing large quantities of drones per year. The nation continues to tighten cooperation across the private sector, scientific researchers and the elected government, on creating new and innovative production avenues for defense, while efforts to become central to the “democratic supply chain” are only increasing. Anduril is seeing all of these positive
Singaporean former Prime Minister and current senior minister Lee Hsien- Loong(李顯龍) last month stood on Chinese soil and told Beijing that Singapore cooperates because of “shared interests”, not because of common “ethnic descent,” a significant statement that has upended China’s cognitive warfare tactics of “ethnic nationalism.” Along with using its military buildup and economic growth to expand its international dominance, China has long deployed ethnic politics to promote the idea that all ethnic Chinese around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a tight bond with the Chinese motherland, by which it means the regime of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
President William Lai Ching-te’s (賴清德) May 20 second-anniversary address was not just a routine policy review; it was damage control. US President Donald Trump’s remarks — that he did not want to see anyone move toward independence and that the delivery of a major Taiwan arms package could depend on the progress of US-China relations — unsettled Taiwan’s public and created an opening for opposition parties to question whether Taiwan was being treated as a bargaining chip in Washington’s dealings with Beijing. Lai’s speech was designed to close that opening. The address covered the expected ground: sovereignty, cross-strait relations, defense spending,
RSS