US Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte has criticized moves toward holding a referendum on applying for UN membership under the name Taiwan. This is an important warning regarding the relations between Taiwan and the US, and we should pay close attention to what follows.
Negroponte's statements bring to mind former secretary of state Colin Powell's interview with Hong Kong's Phoenix Television in October 2004. Powell said at the time: "There is only one China. Taiwan is not independent. It does not enjoy sovereignty as a nation."
Recently, with statements like Negroponte's that a referendum is "a step towards the declaration ... of independence of Taiwan," or by Dennis Wilder, the senior director of East Asian Affairs on the US' National Security Council, that: "Taiwan, or the Republic of China, is not at this point a state," Washington has virtually become a mouthpiece for the Chinese government. It is increasingly obvious that China uses the US government to put pressure on Taiwan.
The problem is that the US is willing to oppress Taiwanese democracy rather than muster up the will or the courage to take a stand against China's arbitrary and unreasonable demands. And when the US chooses the side of China, relations between Taiwan and the US cannot avoid structural change.
For a long time, Taiwan was different from other Asian countries in that it had no strong national anti-US feeling or movement.
It is therefore worth examining how the US government's position brushes aside the manifestation of the will of the Taiwanese public and harms relations between Taiwan and the US.
With the US and China standing together in preventing Taiwan from breaking out of its diplomatic isolation, feelings of dislike and distrust are growing among Taiwanese. Some polls in Taiwan illustrate this development. The favorable impression the Taiwanese have of the US is steadily weakening, and anti-US sentiment is brewing.
In the interview with Phoenix Television, Negroponte said that "Taiwan has no better friend than the United States." But Washington often disregards the fact that for a long time, Taiwan has been the US' most reliable friend. It seems to take Taiwan's support and cooperation for granted, while disregarding what Taiwan stands for and what it wants. US opposition to Taiwan holding a referendum on UN membership reflects this arrogant attitude.
The biggest blind spot the US has regarding Taiwan is that it doesn't know how to deal with its democracy and its people.
It still believes that by putting pressure on Taiwan's leaders it can change policy. This is exactly the mistake that the US most often warns the leaders in Beijing against.
When Washington criticizes Taipei and says that pushing for a referendum is a mistake, it not only criticizes President Chen Shui-bian (
Rhetoric that seeks to separate Chen from the public only serves to show how little the US, one of the world's foremost democracies, understands democracy.
Arrogance and lack of understanding on the part of the US only makes Taiwanese feel angry and frustrated.
When anti-US sentiment emerges in Taiwan, it could gradually evolve into anti-Americanism, and this in turn could influence Taiwan's strategic choices.
This might be the most important factor in structural changes in the relationship between Taiwan and the US.
Lo Chih-cheng is an assistant professor of political science at Soochow University and the secretary-general of the Taiwan Society.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS