The government on Saturday finally summoned the courage to complete the most provocative act thus far in its efforts to rid the nation of the legacy of its authoritarian past when it held a ceremony to rename Chiang Kai-shek (
And while the park's new name -- National Taiwan Democracy Memorial Hall -- is far from ideal, the renaming was something that needed to be done, as for far too long the people of Taipei who do not deify the dead dictator have been forced to put up with Chiang's grimacing presence, staring down at them whenever they chose to visit one of the city's more pleasant and peaceful scenic spots.
This time, however, the pan-blue camp has reacted with more restraint than after previous efforts by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government to remove prominent reminders of the former president.
Instead of trying to forcefully prevent the renaming from taking place and mobilizing their supporters to protest the move, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (
In a ridiculous move, the city fined the management of the newly renamed memorial for "damaging" a heritage site nominee and decided to rename Ketagalan Boulevard "Anti-Corruption Democracy Square" in a puerile attempt to hit back at President Chen Shui-bian (
Other pan-blue figures have accused the government of acting "illegally," saying that while they are not necessarily opposed to the move, the administration should have gone about it through the proper legal channels.
These arguments would hold water if facts didn't contradict them. Any resident of the capital is fully aware that the city is in the process of installing new bus shelters and signs, so accommodating the new name of the park would require little extra cost and effort on the city government's part.
As for the legality of the change, the reason the government has resorted to such a convoluted legal process in renaming the hall is because it knows that any bill would stand a snowball in hell's chance of making it through the legislature.
For evidence of this, one need only look at how far the bills eradicating the redundant references to China from the names of the post office and the state-owned electricity and oil companies went. The unreasonable blocking of these moves by a stubborn pan-blue caucus provides the answer.
The next challenge facing the administration will be how to dispose of the gigantic bronze statue of Chiang that resides inside the main hall, as any move to remove it is sure to spark protests. This must surely happen soon, as it is inconceivable that an edifice to a man who was the very antithesis of democracy should be permanently housed in a hall now dedicated to democratic transition.
The president has suggested keeping the huge doors locked and that seems to be the best solution for the time being, but sooner or later the statue has to go.
If the government chooses -- as one suspects it will -- to do so before the legislative and presidential votes, then the manner in which the opposition parties react could have a decisive bearing on the outcome of those elections and, more importantly, the nation's immediate future.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS